>>>>> "Ryan" == Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ryan> I don't seem to be getting mail from the BTS on this bug.
You weren't listed in your mail-followup-to header, but I CCed you
anyway. Hmmm, I guess I should have CCed you at the start, sorry about
that (the BTS doesn't automatically send mail to the submitter).
Ryan> Anyway, it seemed to me that the Creative Commons licenses
Ryan> would be more appropriate since they were specifically
Ryan> designed to cover media:
Ryan> This one is just a MIT-ish license:
Ryan> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/
Ryan> This one is a LGPL-like license without going into details
Ryan> of linking. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/
As far as I can tell, with a quick glance at the summary, both of
these licenses should be OK as far as Debian is concerned.
I assume that the "Share Alike" clause wouldn't affect music created
with these files, as that seems to be the desired outcome.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
