Re: Packages with non-original copyrighted sounds

2003-06-07 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 14:32, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote: > Are public domain files (true public domain, copyright declined by the > author) also restricted by default? Public domain means there is no copyright protection of the work. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message p

Re: Packages with non-original copyrighted sounds

2003-06-07 Thread Roberto Gordo Saez
Found another one: package powermanga-data is shipped with a sound that comes from Windows 95 sounds (file bonus4.wav). The file contains the strings "Microsoft Corporation" and "Windows 95 Utopia Sound Scheme". Should bugs be filled against mentioned packages? -- Roberto Gordo - Free Software E

Re: Packages with non-original copyrighted sounds

2003-06-07 Thread Roberto Gordo Saez
Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller wrote: > It is also urgently needed for the creation of free music that is > not necessarily used by free programs. Due to the lack of free > samples, composers are currently forced into the creation of > non-free music. That's a similar problem to the font's one, i guess.

Re: Open Software License

2003-06-07 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:16:48PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > This is a new one to me. It's the license of elfutils, which is included > in rpm 4.2. This isn't GPL compatible, so in case it is actually being linked with rpm itself, that would be a problem. I'm not commenting on the freeness of the

Re: MySQL licensing and OpenSSL linking issues

2003-06-07 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:54:46PM -, MJ Ray wrote: > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What happens if OSI ever decides to yank their approval from a license, > > what happens then? > > Do OSI have any process to fix their goofs? (APSL...) Maybe they do not feel it is possibl

Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)

2003-06-07 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:09:02PM -, MJ Ray wrote: > Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] The FSF is willing to characterize a document with > > invariant sections as "free" because this allows the FSF to use such > > sections to promote software freedom. > > I'm not sure that i

Re: MySQL licensing and OpenSSL linking issues

2003-06-07 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:25:45PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Other than that issue, I think this would nicely address Debian's needs. > > > I'm pleased to see MySQL AB taking this step to clarify the license of > > > the client libraries. > > > It seems at that point that it would be easi

Re: MySQL licensing and OpenSSL linking issues

2003-06-07 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:33:29PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > Of course, as was pointed out several times in the recent OSD/DFSG > convergence flamewar, the OSD (or DFSG) is not really well suited as a > basis for having a day in court, but that is another issue. It is for that reason that I