Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What happens if OSI ever decides to yank their approval from a license,
> what happens then?
Do OSI have any process to fix their goofs? (APSL...)
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> And yes, I know I should probably be answered "Read the archives",
> but I don't have the time, and I think I'm not the only one :(
>
> Has anyone written such a summary ?
Not to my knowledge. The closest thing so far is Anthony Town's
draft statement:
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:51:31PM -0400, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
>
>> > Would it be reasonable to ask them to "snapshot" the OSI license list
>> > with every release? This would ensure that the permission to link isn't
>> > retroactively revoked by a
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:51:31PM -0400, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> > Would it be reasonable to ask them to "snapshot" the OSI license list
> > with every release? This would ensure that the permission to link isn't
> > retroactively revoked by a third party, while saving MySQL AB the work
> > of
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian T. Sniffen)
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Would it be reasonable to ask them to "snapshot" the OSI license list
> > with every release?
> The contributors would each need to assent to each change of the list, or
> assign copyright to MySQL, or
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:25:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:39:23AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
>> > Attached and below you'll find the recent plans of MySQL regarding
>> > their licenses. I would think that this
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:25:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:39:23AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Attached and below you'll find the recent plans of MySQL regarding
> > their licenses. I would think that this is sufficient for the
> > Debian project. If not
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:39:23AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Attached and below you'll find the recent plans of MySQL regarding
> their licenses. I would think that this is sufficient for the
> Debian project. If not please scream loud now! :-)
[...]
> > Here is our initial plan to fix the
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:06:39AM -0600, Barak Pearlmutter wrote:
> Debian should give RMS a chance to think for a while,
He's had over a year. We raised most of these concerns with the GNU FDL
1.1.
His response was the GNU FDL 1.2.
Perhaps he is counting on our continued lack of action to let
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] The FSF is willing to characterize a document with
> invariant sections as "free" because this allows the FSF to use such
> sections to promote software freedom.
I'm not sure that is accurate. I *think* the FSF position is that free
documentation c
> ... Since RMS
> seems unwilling to change anything, I'd say that _all_ GFDL'd works
> have to go into non-free.
RMS did not say that. He listened to Debian's concerns, and
acknowledged that there were GDFL-related issues he had not previously
been aware of. He characterized them as *primarily*
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Documents with invariant sections will go in "non-free", but this
> shouldn't prevent Debian and the FSF from continuing to work
> together.
There are more problems with the GFDL than just the invariant
sections. Invariant sections are just the worst probl
On 2 June 2003 RMS wrote:
> I've looked at the problems people have reported. Many of them are
> misunderstandings (what they believe is not allowed actually is
> allowed), many of these cases have adequate workarounds, and the rest
> are real inconveniences that shouldn't be exaggerated. [...]
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 21:47, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Even if I were inclined to answer every question that is posed to me
> here and respond to every point, I don't have time. (I am getting 400
> messages a day, and only half of them are junk.)
I wish I was that lucky, my snr is closer to 2
Hello
Attached and below you'll find the recent plans of MySQL regarding
their licenses. I would think that this is sufficient for the
Debian project. If not please scream loud now! :-)
bye,
-christian- / mysql maintainer
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 17:42:42 -0600
> From: Zak Greant <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 05:47:28PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> You still haven't answered two questions put to you publicly,
>
> You are trying to demand the kind of discussion which I've decided not
> to participate in--one that resembles a cross-examination. But this
> is not a court,
16 matches
Mail list logo
