Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, other people purporting to act on behalf of the FSF do.
>
> Did they really claim to be speaking for the FSF, or were they just
> expressing support for the FSF? Anyone can do the latter, but we did
> not ask anyone to speak for t
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 13:12, Richard Stallman wrote:
> There is no difficulty at all here. This collection would be an
> aggregate, and here's what the GFDL says about that:
Thank you for the correction.
Hi RMS,
On Mittwoch 28 Mai 2003 00:40, Richard Stallman wrote:
>>> A political essay is (typically) written by certain
>>> persons to persuade the public of a certain position.
>>> If it is modified, it does not do its job. So it makes
>>> sense, socially, to say that these cannot be modified.
>
At least one situation comes to mind where it might happen: If I wanted
to publish a collection of HOWTOs, e.g., from the LDP. If every one of
them included front and back cover texts, that'd be a mountain.
There is no difficulty at all here. This collection would be an
aggregate, a
Scripsit Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I had the impression that the GPL already provides for forcing the
> original copyright notice and author name to stay in the modified work,
> but could not pinpoint the exact place of it.
I'd point to clause 1 (which is referred to from clause 2): "keep
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> Derivative works must not remove the original author's copyright
> notices, name or comments from source code and documentation. Doing
> so will violate the license.
>
> I had the impression that the GPL already provides for forcing the
> original c
Hello, ...
I came on a program that is distributed under the GPL with the addition
of the following exception :
Derivative works must not remove the original author's copyright
notices, name or comments from source code and documentation. Doing
so will violate the license.
I had the impres
7 matches
Mail list logo
