Re: The Helixcommunity RPSL is not DFSG-free

2003-02-09 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > Time to check it out again! Quoting from https://www.helixcommunity.org/content/rpsl [2.1] (d) You must make Source Code of all Your Externally Deployed Modifications publicly available under the terms of this License, including the license g

Re: The Helixcommunity RPSL is not DFSG-free

2003-02-09 Thread Juhapekka Tolvanen
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, +03:23:16 EET (UTC +0200), J.B. Nicholson-Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys: > You wrote: > > This question still remains: Can I listen and watch to RealAudio- and > > RealVideo-files with completely free software, if I install only > > RPSL-licenced software from H

Re: Perl module licensing, the next step

2003-02-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:39:13PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:25:26PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > > > I've been contacted by Ann Barcomb (see her message below; below that is > > > her > > > second message t

The Helixcommunity RPSL is not DFSG-free

2003-02-09 Thread J.B. Nicholson-Owens
You wrote: > This question still remains: Can I listen and watch to RealAudio- and > RealVideo-files with completely free software, if I install only > RPSL-licenced software from Helix DNA? There was a debian-legal thread about this already (see http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-le

Re: Perl module licensing, the next step

2003-02-09 Thread Don Armstrong
This is not legal advice. I am not a lawyer. On Sun, 09 Feb 2003, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Perhaps (taking the GPL as a hint): >> >> This module is available under the same terms and conditions as >> Perl itself, version 5.3 or (at your opt

Re: Perl module licensing, the next step

2003-02-09 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:25:26PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > > I've been contacted by Ann Barcomb (see her message below; below that is her > > second message to me) about the Perl module license issue. I've put her on > > the Cc and would appr

Re: Perl module licensing, the next step

2003-02-09 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:25:26PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > I've been contacted by Ann Barcomb (see her message below; below that is her > second message to me) about the Perl module license issue. I've put her on > the Cc and would appreciate it if you could keep her on the list of >

Perl module licensing, the next step

2003-02-09 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Hi, I've been contacted by Ann Barcomb (see her message below; below that is her second message to me) about the Perl module license issue. I've put her on the Cc and would appreciate it if you could keep her on the list of recepients. So, what information do we feed back to the Perl community i

Yet another bunch of licences

2003-02-09 Thread Juhapekka Tolvanen
These are really important projects that claim to be free in the sense of freedom. But I'd like to know, what Free Software Foundation and readers of debian-legal think about those licences. So, please, evaluate those licences carefully And I hope, that then FSF can make some statements about th