On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:39:13PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:25:26PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > > > I've been contacted by Ann Barcomb (see her message below; below that is > > > her > > > second message to me) about the Perl module license issue. I've put her > > > on > > > the Cc and would appreciate it if you could keep her on the list of > > > recepients. > > > > > > So, what information do we feed back to the Perl community in order for > > > them > > > to "fix" their licenses.
> > Well, there's arguments on both sides, but doesn't yet seem to be a > > consensus > > on whether this is a real problem or not. Clarifying it probably can't > > hurt, though. > It's also my impression there's no consensus, but what is the deciding enity > in > Debian on this matter: ftp-masters, the technical committee, ...? The ftp-masters have veto power over packages entering the archive, be it for technical or legal reasons. You might be able to appeal to the technical committee, but I doubt they would consider the matter without some kind of consensus on debian-legal that the ftp-masters are wrong. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgp3QQ7k59zxC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
