上海开发区注册公司优惠

开发区是上海金山区政府下属的经济实体，区政府对 注册、落户在开发区的企业有一系列优惠政策。详情 见http://www.fngjng.com

Re: Balsa: Indirect linking to OpenSSL via LGPL and OpenLDAP libs

On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:47, Andrew Lau wrote: > Hi everyone, > I was wondering whether it would be legal for me compile and > link Balsa (GPL) to the libesmtp5 (LGPL) [1] and libldap2 (OpenLDAP PL > [2]) libs. Doing so results in a binary that is indirectly linked to > OpenSSL for which Balsa

Bug#173601: ITP: jpgraph -- OO Graph Library for PHP

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-18 Severity: wishlist * Package name: jpgraph Version : 1.10 Upstream Author : Johan Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.aditus.nu/jpgraph/ * License : Dual QPL 1.0 (non-free?) and Commercial Description

Final licence for the Bewan ADSL modem drivers.

Hello, ... Well, Bewan finally release version 0.4.2 of their drivers with the following licence : Program code and documentation are (C) Copyright 2002 BeWAN systems All rights reserved. This package is free software; you

Re: Balsa: Indirect linking to OpenSSL via LGPL and OpenLDAP libs

Could someone please answer my legal query, or provide me with some persuasive arguments for including an OpenSSL exclusion clause in addition to the GPL that I can send to Balsa upstream. I can't really work on fixing this neglected package until someone tells me what I can and can't do with Balsa

Re: Two large groups of non-free fonts in main.

Scripsit "Zephaniah E. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Severity: serious > Package: xfonts-75dpi Standard BTS/mailing list warning follows: *NEVER* *EVER* crosspost directly between [EMAIL PROTECTED] and mailing lists! Doing this means that mailing list subscribers who just do a "wide reply"

Re: Bug#172181: lzw code missing (no patent?)

severity 172181 wishlist thanks Hi Drew, [ Cc:'ing debian-legal... ] Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > There may not be reason to exclude the lzw and related code as the LZW > patent is "running out". > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200211/msg00160.html Yes. It seems to be ru

Two large groups of non-free fonts in main.

Severity: serious Package: xfonts-75dpi Note, while this is filed against xfonts-75dpi, it affects several of the font packages generated from the xfree86 source package, feel free to reassign to another package. The two large groups in question are the Utopia (UT*) and the Lucida (lu*) fonts. T