Patent Information

2002-03-01 Thread Crystal & Jay
My Name is Crystal I am trying to find out information reqarding an idea for a product for marketing and don't know where to get help and information. I am writting from Edmonton, Alberta. If you could give an Idea of whom I should talk to first please correspond back.

Re: WARNING: Crypto software to be included into main Debian distribution

2002-03-01 Thread Walter Landry
Anthony Towns wrote: > And frankly, no, you _can't_ export code and say "Do whatever you want > with it" in that sense: you can't export gcc to a T7 country and tell > them, "go ahead, use it to build a nuclear arsenal". Excuse me? Why can't I do that? There are no export restrictions on softwa

Re: WARNING: Crypto software to be included into main Debian distribution

2002-03-01 Thread Walter Landry
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These two situations seem quite analogous to me. Does placing either > condition (monetary compensation, or warranting that they're not > planning to destroy the Earth) on access to particular mirror sites > violate the licenses of software contained i

[±¤°í] Á¾·®Á¦ ºÀÅõ Àý¾àÇü ¾ÐÃྲ·¹±âÅë ¼Ò°³

2002-03-01 Thread magicpw
  ▷ ì›ì¹˜ì•Šì€ 정보였다면 정중히 사과 드리며, 수신 거부를 해주시면 다음부터는 메일이 발송되지 않을 것입니다.▷ ë©”일클라이언트의 필터 기능을 이용하여 [광고] 문구를 필터링하면 모든 광고 메일을 자동으로 차단하ì‹

Re: Bug#92810: doc-rfc license

2002-03-01 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:14:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 03:05:23PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: > > This bus is open for 11 months already (since 03 Apr 2001), and > > doc-rfc maintainer told the world that he is not going to do > > anything about the issue (a

Bug#92810: Info received (was Bug#92810: doc-rfc license)

2002-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Kai Henningsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If

Re: Bug#92810: doc-rfc license

2002-03-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 03:05:23PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: > Each time I scan Release-critical Bugreport, this issue stops my eye. > > This bus is open for 11 months already (since 03 Apr 2001), and doc-rfc > maintainer told the world that he is not going to do anything about the > issue (

Re: WARNING: Crypto software to be included into main Debian distribution

2002-03-01 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Scripsit Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > You seem to be saying that the contract is worthless since it is > > > difficult to enforce. > > No, I'm saying that the contract is unneccesary, because it

Re: WARNING: Crypto software to be included into main Debian distribution

2002-03-01 Thread Joey Hess
Steve Langasek wrote: > These two situations seem quite analogous to me. Seems like quite a stretch to me. > Does placing either condition (monetary compensation, or warranting > that they're not planning to destroy the Earth) on access to > particular mirror sites violate the licenses of softwar