My Name is Crystal I am trying to find out
information reqarding an idea for a product for marketing and don't know where
to get help and information. I am writting from Edmonton, Alberta. If you could
give an Idea of whom I should talk to first please correspond back.
Anthony Towns wrote:
> And frankly, no, you _can't_ export code and say "Do whatever you want
> with it" in that sense: you can't export gcc to a T7 country and tell
> them, "go ahead, use it to build a nuclear arsenal".
Excuse me? Why can't I do that? There are no export restrictions on
softwa
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These two situations seem quite analogous to me. Does placing either
> condition (monetary compensation, or warranting that they're not
> planning to destroy the Earth) on access to particular mirror sites
> violate the licenses of software contained i
â· ìì¹ìì ì ë³´ìë¤ë©´ ì ì¤í ì¬ê³¼ ë리며, ìì ê±°ë¶ë¥¼ í´ì£¼ìë©´ ë¤ìë¶í°ë ë©ì¼ì´ ë°ì¡ëì§ ìì ê²ì
ëë¤.â· ë©ì¼í´ë¼ì´ì¸í¸ì íí° ê¸°ë¥ì ì´ì©íì¬ [ê´ê³ ] 문구를 íí°ë§íë©´ 모ë ê´ê³ ë©ì¼ì ìëì¼ë¡ ì°¨ë¨íì
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:14:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 03:05:23PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> > This bus is open for 11 months already (since 03 Apr 2001), and
> > doc-rfc maintainer told the world that he is not going to do
> > anything about the issue (a
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
Kai Henningsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 03:05:23PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> Each time I scan Release-critical Bugreport, this issue stops my eye.
>
> This bus is open for 11 months already (since 03 Apr 2001), and doc-rfc
> maintainer told the world that he is not going to do anything about the
> issue (
Scripsit Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Scripsit Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > You seem to be saying that the contract is worthless since it is
> > > difficult to enforce.
> > No, I'm saying that the contract is unneccesary, because it
Steve Langasek wrote:
> These two situations seem quite analogous to me.
Seems like quite a stretch to me.
> Does placing either condition (monetary compensation, or warranting
> that they're not planning to destroy the Earth) on access to
> particular mirror sites violate the licenses of softwar
9 matches
Mail list logo