Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 06:15:09PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 05:57:49PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > > Um, it wasn't me that Branden was flaming a
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 06:15:09PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 05:57:49PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > Um, it wasn't me that Branden was flaming at.
> >
> > Yes it was. With my followup to your mail.
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 05:57:49PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Um, it wasn't me that Branden was flaming at.
>
> Yes it was. With my followup to your mail.
Anthony said "It's you that's violating list policy." It wasn't me,
it was Henni
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 05:57:49PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Um, it wasn't me that Branden was flaming at.
Yes it was. With my followup to your mail.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Mob rule isn't any prettier just
Debian GNU/Linux | because you ca
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 04:54:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Well, what I'd prefer is that people all followed of the following:
>
> Yes, because clearly you're in the right, and it's the people who don't
> want to be Cc'ed that're making the special request.
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 04:54:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Well, what I'd prefer is that people all followed of the following:
Yes, because clearly you're in the right, and it's the people who don't
want to be Cc'ed that're making the special request.
Unfortunately, that's _not_ the
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I SUBSCRIBE TO THIS LIST; DO NOT CC ME ON REPLIES, YOU FILTHY SWINES.
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 04:13:56PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Please respect my damn mail headers.
> >
> > And "dam
I SUBSCRIBE TO THIS LIST; DO NOT CC ME ON REPLIES, YOU FILTHY SWINES.
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 04:13:56PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please respect my damn mail headers.
>
> And "damn headers" they are. This business of hiding little reque
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:01:14AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:39:32PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> >
> > > > I don't need to defend whatever past decisions
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:01:14AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:39:32PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> > > I don't need to defend whatever past decisions may have been made;
> > > they quite possibly were simpl
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
> Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > - Someone still has a copy. Then the person that made the changes
> > should be able to retrieve it and send the maintainer a copy.
> If I make a change, and then distribute to John Doe, and then
Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:39:32PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > I don't need to defend whatever past decisions may have been made;
> > they quite possibly were simply incorrect.
> Unless, of course, they involved the GNU Emacs Manual, righ
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:27:46PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > It also does not require that I send the changes to the maintainer.
> > That's the sticking point.
> The GPL requires you to make the source code available to every user.
> That's quite bit stickier, in my opinion. For most com
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 02:39:32PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> I don't need to defend whatever past decisions may have been made;
> they quite possibly were simply incorrect.
Unless, of course, they involved the GNU Emacs Manual, right? :-P
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debia
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:27:46PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> The GPL requires you to make the source code available to every user.
> That's quite bit stickier, in my opinion. For most companies that means
> they can't make money on their software. That's the main disadvantage of
> using the
Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The GPL does not require that you keep the source code forever. When
> > I give a copy to my friend, I have finished all my responsibilities.
> > I have no requirement to keep a copy, or know how to get in touch with
> > my friend next year.
>
> The
Thomas -
> The GPL does not require that you keep the source code forever. When
> I give a copy to my friend, I have finished all my responsibilities.
> I have no requirement to keep a copy, or know how to get in touch with
> my friend next year.
The Vim license also doesn't require you keep th
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 10:10:40PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > > - Nobody has a copy of this modified version. Then it doesn't exist
> > > and the license doesn't apply.
> >
> > Wrong, the paragraph says that if you distribute a modified version,
> > then you must provide the changes to th
Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, the license doesn't say forever.
It has no time limit, does it?
> The easiest way to avoid this is to send me the changes before
> destroying them. Then you no longer need to keep a copy. And yes, if
> you distribute a modified version of Vim, t
Thomas -
> Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If this is so, then there are these possibilities:
> >
> > - Nobody has a copy of this modified version. Then it doesn't exist
> > and the license doesn't apply.
>
> Wrong, the paragraph says that if you distribute a modified versi
Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If this is so, then there are these possibilities:
>
> - Nobody has a copy of this modified version. Then it doesn't exist
> and the license doesn't apply.
Wrong, the paragraph says that if you distribute a modified version,
then you must provide t
Thomas Bushnell wrote:
> Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It is allowed to distribute a modified version of Vim, with
> > executables and/or source code, when the following conditions are
> > met. If you distribute a modified version of Vim, you are
> > encouraged to make it ava
Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is allowed to distribute a modified version of Vim, with
> executables and/or source code, when the following conditions are
> met. If you distribute a modified version of Vim, you are
> encouraged to make it available to the maintainer, including t
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 01:26:38PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Henning Makholm wrote:
> I don't see this as a relevant problem. The person that distributed the
> modified version can ask the people he gave the source code to send me a
> copy. So he can still delete his own copy (although that'
Richard -
> That only talks about unmodified executables. So nothing seems
> to give permission for distributing executables of modified
> versions of Vim. It is important to give that permission
> explicitly.
It was given implicitly, but I can clear that up to avoid confusion.
> It seems
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > You are not allowed to distribute a modified version of Vim when you
> > are not willing to make the source code available to the maintainer
> > or do not want to let him decide what to do with your changes.
>
> This is non
26 matches
Mail list logo
