Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 06:15:09PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 05:57:49PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > > Um, it wasn't me that Branden was flaming at. > > > > > > Yes it was. With my followup to your mail. > > > > Anthony said "It's you that's violating list policy." It wasn't me, > > it was Henning Makholm. > > "I SUBSCRIBE TO THIS LIST; DO NOT CC ME ON REPLIES, YOU FILTHY SWINES."
Oh, but that's fine, if abrasive. In fact, you seem to be using Mail-Copies-To and X-No-CC, and gnus does seem to support one or both of those. So that'll make it easy with your emails. Maybe Anthony Towns will add those; that will make it easier. Indeed, perhaps lists.debian.org should automatically add them. I'll file a bug. In any case, in-band transmission is surely going to be more reliable. Headers are mostly directed at email software, in band at users, so if you want the user's attention, a (polite) reminder would do the trick. > That's okay. I'll turn the heat way the fuck up on all future flames of > you that I write, so that I can be sure you know you're being flamed. How about the idea that flaming is entirely counterproductive?
