On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 07:46:13PM -0600, Bob McElrath wrote:
> Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 06:49:59PM -0600, Bob McElrath wrote:
> > > Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:37:40PM -0600, Bob McElrath wrote:
> > > > GPL
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 06:49:59PM -0600, Bob McElrath wrote:
> > Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:37:40PM -0600, Bob McElrath wrote:
> > > GPL section 6, when talking about distributing the program, says
> > > "You
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 06:49:59PM -0600, Bob McElrath wrote:
> Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:37:40PM -0600, Bob McElrath wrote:
> > GPL section 6, when talking about distributing the program, says
> > "You may not impose any further restrictions on the re
Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:37:40PM -0600, Bob McElrath wrote:
> > Could you clarify this for me? How is a usage restriction in violation
> > of the GPL? How does this preclude me from including code from other
> > GPL projects? Can you point me to the
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:37:40PM -0600, Bob McElrath wrote:
> Could you clarify this for me? How is a usage restriction in violation
> of the GPL? How does this preclude me from including code from other
> GPL projects? Can you point me to the appropriate part of the GPL that
> mentions this?
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bob McElrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > Is the author aware that the extra clauses also make his license
> > > incompatible with the GPL? This means he can't use GPL code from
> > > other programs in FilterProxy.
> >
> > Could you clarify this fo
Bob McElrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Is the author aware that the extra clauses also make his license
> > incompatible with the GPL? This means he can't use GPL code from
> > other programs in FilterProxy.
>
> Could you clarify this for me? How is a usage restriction in violation
> of the GPL?
Regarding the discussion on debian-devel about FilterProxy, you said:
> You should add more than just this line. The entire text of LICENSE
> should go into the copyright file.
>
> Is the author aware that the extra clauses also make his license
> incompatible with the GPL? This means he can't u
[follow-ups to debian-legal]
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 07:01:58PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 07:45:21PM +0200, Yotam Rubin wrote:
> > I'm afraid the license is not DFSG compliant:
> > "6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor
> The license states that it can be use
On Friday 9 March 2001, at 20 h 52,
the keyboard of Brian Ristuccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On an additional note, would Stephane Bortzmeyer accept a patch that causes
> dupload to mail a copy of the upload to a list of email addresses before it
> is uploaded? It could be used, for example,
10 matches
Mail list logo
