Raul writes:
> Only if you use (non-trivial) literal quotes from those works.
I don't use any. That's my point. No one expects me to credit everyone
from whom my knowledge can be said to be "derived".
The primary purpose of references in an academic publication is to permit
others to check th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on a perl application right now, and much of my knowledge of
> perl is derived from _Programming Perl_ and the _Perl Cookbook_. Does that
> mean that I must credit Christiansen, Wall, Scwartz, and Torkington on a
> splash screen?
Only if
Juan Cespedes writes:
> Here's a copy of the license. Any comments will be greatly
> appreciated; the author is willing to change it if it doesn't meet our
> needs. (BTW: I think it's FDSG free):
I don't. The author may have meant it to be free, but it is so poorly
drafted that it can only be in
Milan Zamazal writes:
> The problem here ... which is worth to discuss is: There is some
> knowledge, from which you derive other knowledge and present it as your
> achievement. Is it OK to require you have also reference the original
> knowledge in your presentation?
I'm working on a perl applic
Juan Cespedes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
III. Modified forms of the Software may be created and distributed
as long as the authors are informed of this action if possible,
Requiring notification for modification makes it non-free IMHO. But
I'm not sure where this falls under the DFSG.
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 16:44:52 +0100, Juan Cespedes wrote:
> Here's a copy of the license. Any comments will be greatly
> appreciated; the author is willing to change it if it doesn't meet our
> needs.
The nasm author(s) have said they'd release it under GPL; that would clear
all problems
Here's a copy of the license. Any comments will be greatly
appreciated; the author is willing to change it if it doesn't meet our
needs. (BTW: I think it's FDSG free):
Terms and Conditions for the use of the Netwide Assembler
=
Can
On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
> The package tao, currently in Incoming, has this paragraph in its license:
>
> You may copy, modify, distribute, or sublicense the LICENCED PRODUCT
> without charge as part of a product or software program developed by
> you, so long as you pre
The package tao, currently in Incoming, has this paragraph in its license:
You may copy, modify, distribute, or sublicense the LICENCED PRODUCT
without charge as part of a product or software program developed by
you, so long as you preserve the functionality of interoperating with
the Obj
> "JH" == john <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JH> Milan Zamazal writes:
>> This is a question. You can look on publication which was
>> received through the program [SWI-Prolog] as a derived work of
>> some kind. It can be looked in similar way as e.g. output of ray
>> trac
> "RM" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RM> What's "research"?
RM> For example, how is it different from searching?
:-)
I said I'm not talking about particular license (so not about particular
wording as well), but about things pointed out by some particular
license.
Mila
11 matches
Mail list logo
