Title: Sarge NetInstall & partition the harddisk
Hello
I have a Toshiba Porttege R100 without CD and FLOPPY, therefore I'm trying the net installation.
In the past you people was help in order to made the DHCP boot, thanks.
Now I'm using the file:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/d
Tim Taubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i'm sure i can select it at the installtion process, can't i? ... i
> crashed my whole system with this damn ati stuff.. dpkg is not working
> anymore.. ext2 gave up :) i have to re-install the system.. by the
> way.. is ext3 at any better than ext2?
Yes,
On September 7, 2004 09:21 am, Michael Olson wrote:
> Tim Taubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > i'm sure i can select it at the installtion process, can't i? ... i
> > crashed my whole system with this damn ati stuff.. dpkg is not working
> > anymore.. ext2 gave up :) i have to re-install the sys
Hi,
I have recently bought a new laptop (Intel Pentium M processor) and
tried to test the SpeedStep-function. Therefore, I downloaded the
kernel-source 2.6.7 and compiled it with the "Enhanced SpeedStep"
support. Unfortunately, the following error was reported, as I tried to
load the speedstep-cent
Hi,
I have recently bought a new laptop (Intel Pentium M processor) and
tried to test the SpeedStep-function. Therefore, I downloaded the
kernel-source 2.6.7 and compiled it with the "Enhanced SpeedStep"
support. Unfortunately, the following error was reported, as I tried to
load the speedstep-cent
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:34:13PM +0200, astryx wrote:
> Hi,
> I have recently bought a new laptop (Intel Pentium M processor) and
> tried to test the SpeedStep-function. Therefore, I downloaded the
> kernel-source 2.6.7 and compiled it with the "Enhanced SpeedStep"
> support. Unfortunately, the f
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:46:02PM +0200, Bruno Ducrot wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:34:13PM +0200, astryx wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have recently bought a new laptop (Intel Pentium M processor) and
> > tried to test the SpeedStep-function. Therefore, I downloaded the
> > kernel-source 2.6.7 and c
Adobe Photoshop 7.0 - 60
Macromedia Studio MX 2004 - 180
Macromedia Studio MX 2004 - 180
Microsoft Office XP Professional - 100
Borland Delphi 7 Professional - 70
Ahead Nero v6.3 Powerpack - 40
Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional - 50
Macromedia Studio MX 2004 - 180
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterp
On Di, 07 Sep 2004, astryx wrote:
> Hi,
> I have recently bought a new laptop (Intel Pentium M processor) and
> tried to test the SpeedStep-function. Therefore, I downloaded the
> kernel-source 2.6.7 and compiled it with the "Enhanced SpeedStep"
> support. Unfortunately, the following error was re
Hi There,
Looks like you've got a Pentium 4-M system, not a centrino. This is the
same as my machine (Dell Inspiron 8500).
So, build the speedstep-ich module:
Intel Speedstep on ICH-M chipsets (ioport interface)
rather than the 'enhanced speedstep' module. This module should load
cleanly into
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 16:51, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> Looks like you've got a Pentium 4-M system, not a centrino. This is the
Argh - Looks like I jumped the gun :)
My machine says:
model name : Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU 2.20GHz
> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 04:51:41PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> Looks like you've got a Pentium 4-M system, not a centrino. This is the
> same as my machine (Dell Inspiron 8500).
>
cpu family is 6, not 15 as for Pentium 4.
--
Bruno Ducrot
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apat
Thus spake Martin Weinberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> In short, (nearly, see below) everything worked out of the box.
Lucky you. I've installed two machines from the RC1 disc one a desktop
(AMD Athlon) one a Toshiba A30 notebook (my wife's machine).
What puzzles me is the differenes between the two
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:41:04AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thus spake Martin Weinberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > In short, (nearly, see below) everything worked out of the box.
>
> Lucky you. I've installed two machines from the RC1 disc one a desktop
> (AMD Athlon) one a Toshiba A30
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 19:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On the notebook: tasksel didn't offer me the options of 'desktop' or
> any of the languages (distinct contrast to the desktop system), so no
> KDE, no gcc, no make etc etc.
>
This is probab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 09:11, Gustavo Halperin wrote:
> Now came the problem, I afraid that the net-install not support
> repartition of the hard disk, I'm right ??
No, your hard disc should be recognized and you should be able to repartition.
Y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry for the double post but I forgot something.
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 09:11, Gustavo Halperin wrote:
> Now came the problem, I afraid that the net-install not support
> repartition of the hard disk, I'm right ??
No, your hard disc should be
I'm interested in buying a laptop that will run 64-bit Debian. Is
anyone out there doing this? What are the problems you've
encountered?
I'm also interested in running VMWare 4 on this same laptop. Can it
be done, or do you need to run 32-bit Debian instead?
--
Cheers,
Miles K. Forrest
--
Hello,
am Dienstag, 7. September 2004 21:39 schrieb Miles K. Forrest:
> I'm interested in buying a laptop that will run 64-bit Debian. Is
> anyone out there doing this? What are the problems you've
> encountered?
I had a SID installed on my Acer Aspire1513LMi. It ran rather good. But my 32
bit
On 7 Sep 2004, Derek Broughton wrote:
> On September 7, 2004 09:21 am, Michael Olson wrote:
>> Tim Taubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> i'm sure i can select it at the installtion process, can't i? ... i
>>> crashed my whole system with this damn ati stuff.. dpkg is not working
>>> anymore.. ext
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:19:56PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote :
> Also, any journaled filesystem is slower at many things than a
> non-journalled filesystem, since the presence of the journal adds choke
> points and additional work. In some ways, ext2 *is* better than any of
> the others. :)
Title: Sarge NetInstall & partition the harddisk
Hello
I have a Toshiba Porttege R100 without CD and FLOPPY, therefore I'm trying the net installation.
In the past you people was help in order to made the DHCP boot, thanks.
Now I'm using the file:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/d
Tim Taubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i'm sure i can select it at the installtion process, can't i? ... i
> crashed my whole system with this damn ati stuff.. dpkg is not working
> anymore.. ext2 gave up :) i have to re-install the system.. by the
> way.. is ext3 at any better than ext2?
Yes,
On September 7, 2004 09:21 am, Michael Olson wrote:
> Tim Taubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > i'm sure i can select it at the installtion process, can't i? ... i
> > crashed my whole system with this damn ati stuff.. dpkg is not working
> > anymore.. ext2 gave up :) i have to re-install the sys
Hi,
I have recently bought a new laptop (Intel Pentium M processor) and
tried to test the SpeedStep-function. Therefore, I downloaded the
kernel-source 2.6.7 and compiled it with the "Enhanced SpeedStep"
support. Unfortunately, the following error was reported, as I tried to
load the speedstep-cent
Hi,
I have recently bought a new laptop (Intel Pentium M processor) and
tried to test the SpeedStep-function. Therefore, I downloaded the
kernel-source 2.6.7 and compiled it with the "Enhanced SpeedStep"
support. Unfortunately, the following error was reported, as I tried to
load the speedstep-cent
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:34:13PM +0200, astryx wrote:
> Hi,
> I have recently bought a new laptop (Intel Pentium M processor) and
> tried to test the SpeedStep-function. Therefore, I downloaded the
> kernel-source 2.6.7 and compiled it with the "Enhanced SpeedStep"
> support. Unfortunately, the f
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:46:02PM +0200, Bruno Ducrot wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:34:13PM +0200, astryx wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have recently bought a new laptop (Intel Pentium M processor) and
> > tried to test the SpeedStep-function. Therefore, I downloaded the
> > kernel-source 2.6.7 and c
Adobe Photoshop 7.0 - 60
Macromedia Studio MX 2004 - 180
Macromedia Studio MX 2004 - 180
Microsoft Office XP Professional - 100
Borland Delphi 7 Professional - 70
Ahead Nero v6.3 Powerpack - 40
Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional - 50
Macromedia Studio MX 2004 - 180
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterp
On Di, 07 Sep 2004, astryx wrote:
> Hi,
> I have recently bought a new laptop (Intel Pentium M processor) and
> tried to test the SpeedStep-function. Therefore, I downloaded the
> kernel-source 2.6.7 and compiled it with the "Enhanced SpeedStep"
> support. Unfortunately, the following error was re
Hi There,
Looks like you've got a Pentium 4-M system, not a centrino. This is the
same as my machine (Dell Inspiron 8500).
So, build the speedstep-ich module:
Intel Speedstep on ICH-M chipsets (ioport interface)
rather than the 'enhanced speedstep' module. This module should load
cleanly into
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 16:51, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> Looks like you've got a Pentium 4-M system, not a centrino. This is the
Argh - Looks like I jumped the gun :)
My machine says:
model name : Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU 2.20GHz
> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 04:51:41PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> Looks like you've got a Pentium 4-M system, not a centrino. This is the
> same as my machine (Dell Inspiron 8500).
>
cpu family is 6, not 15 as for Pentium 4.
--
Bruno Ducrot
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apat
Thus spake Martin Weinberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> In short, (nearly, see below) everything worked out of the box.
Lucky you. I've installed two machines from the RC1 disc one a desktop
(AMD Athlon) one a Toshiba A30 notebook (my wife's machine).
What puzzles me is the differenes between the two
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:41:04AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thus spake Martin Weinberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > In short, (nearly, see below) everything worked out of the box.
>
> Lucky you. I've installed two machines from the RC1 disc one a desktop
> (AMD Athlon) one a Toshiba A30
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 19:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On the notebook: tasksel didn't offer me the options of 'desktop' or
> any of the languages (distinct contrast to the desktop system), so no
> KDE, no gcc, no make etc etc.
>
This is probab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 09:11, Gustavo Halperin wrote:
> Now came the problem, I afraid that the net-install not support
> repartition of the hard disk, I'm right ??
No, your hard disc should be recognized and you should be able to repartition.
Y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry for the double post but I forgot something.
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 09:11, Gustavo Halperin wrote:
> Now came the problem, I afraid that the net-install not support
> repartition of the hard disk, I'm right ??
No, your hard disc should be
I'm interested in buying a laptop that will run 64-bit Debian. Is
anyone out there doing this? What are the problems you've
encountered?
I'm also interested in running VMWare 4 on this same laptop. Can it
be done, or do you need to run 32-bit Debian instead?
--
Cheers,
Miles K. Forrest
Hello,
am Dienstag, 7. September 2004 21:39 schrieb Miles K. Forrest:
> I'm interested in buying a laptop that will run 64-bit Debian. Is
> anyone out there doing this? What are the problems you've
> encountered?
I had a SID installed on my Acer Aspire1513LMi. It ran rather good. But my 32
bit
On 7 Sep 2004, Derek Broughton wrote:
> On September 7, 2004 09:21 am, Michael Olson wrote:
>> Tim Taubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> i'm sure i can select it at the installtion process, can't i? ... i
>>> crashed my whole system with this damn ati stuff.. dpkg is not working
>>> anymore.. ext
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:19:56PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote :
> Also, any journaled filesystem is slower at many things than a
> non-journalled filesystem, since the presence of the journal adds choke
> points and additional work. In some ways, ext2 *is* better than any of
> the others. :)
42 matches
Mail list logo
