Sean 'Shaleh' Perry schrieb:
>
> On 15-Sep-99 Werner Heuser wrote:
> > Sean 'Shaleh' Perry schrieb:
> >>
> >> Why framebuffer?
> > - usually for every new graphic card there has to be a Linux
> > X server developed. Framebuffer is kind of 'generic' graphic card
> > support, at least if the car
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry schrieb:
>
> On 15-Sep-99 Werner Heuser wrote:
> > Sean 'Shaleh' Perry schrieb:
> >>
> >> Why framebuffer?
> > - usually for every new graphic card there has to be a Linux
> > X server developed. Framebuffer is kind of 'generic' graphic card
> > support, at least if the car
On 15-Sep-99 Werner Heuser wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry schrieb:
>>
>> Why framebuffer?
> - usually for every new graphic card there has to be a Linux
> X server developed. Framebuffer is kind of 'generic' graphic card
> support, at least if the card manufacturers follow
> the VESA VBE sta
On 15-Sep-99 Werner Heuser wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry schrieb:
>>
>> Why framebuffer?
> - usually for every new graphic card there has to be a Linux
> X server developed. Framebuffer is kind of 'generic' graphic card
> support, at least if the card manufacturers follow
> the VESA VBE sta
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry schrieb:
>
> Why framebuffer?
- usually for every new graphic card there has to be a Linux
X server developed. Framebuffer is kind of 'generic' graphic card
support, at least if the card manufacturers follow
the VESA VBE standard.
- framebuffer devices could use the hard
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry schrieb:
>
> Why framebuffer?
- usually for every new graphic card there has to be a Linux
X server developed. Framebuffer is kind of 'generic' graphic card
support, at least if the card manufacturers follow
the VESA VBE standard.
- framebuffer devices could use the hard
On 14-Sep-99 NatePuri wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:02:52AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> I am packaging divine, should appear in the next week - I have to get libnet
>> happy and packaged first.
>
> What is divine?
>
http://www.fefe.de/divine/
>> the hardware detection is much la
On 14-Sep-99 NatePuri wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:02:52AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> I am packaging divine, should appear in the next week - I have to get libnet
>> happy and packaged first.
>
> What is divine?
>
http://www.fefe.de/divine/
>> the hardware detection is much la
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:02:52AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> I am packaging divine, should appear in the next week - I have to get libnet
> happy and packaged first.
What is divine?
> the hardware detection is much larger than laptops and is being looked into
> slowly
I'm very interest
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:02:52AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> I am packaging divine, should appear in the next week - I have to get libnet
> happy and packaged first.
What is divine?
> the hardware detection is much larger than laptops and is being looked into
> slowly
I'm very interest
Why framebuffer?
pentium ops are actually minimal compared to the -O2 output from egcc, plus the
code is larger
does irda need an "official" debian maintainer -- I can find one.
the xserver in potato works with all supported Neomagic chips, a separate
neomagic server is no longer needed
I am pa
Why framebuffer?
pentium ops are actually minimal compared to the -O2 output from egcc, plus the
code is larger
does irda need an "official" debian maintainer -- I can find one.
the xserver in potato works with all supported Neomagic chips, a separate
neomagic server is no longer needed
I am pa
12 matches
Mail list logo
