Hello Bret!
Bret Busby schrieb:
> I have an HP/Compaq NX5000 laptop, that I dual boot into Windows XP
> Pro and Debian 4.0.
>
> The network access is okay with Windows XP, but works only
> intermittently with Debian.
>
> "Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4401-B0 100Base-TX (rev
> 02
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:01:50 +0200
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 00:03:07 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
...
> > The PCI listing in the KDE Info Center, shows the Ethernet card as
> > "Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4401-B0 100Base-TX (rev 02) "
> >
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 09:01:50PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
> dmesg | grep b44
>
> right after boot. Does that turn up anything?
should see something, since it works intermittently. Though I'd rather use
% dmesg | egrep 'eth|b44|ndis'
so we see what ethx you have there, if b44 module tel
wondering whether something is wrong with the network card driver in
> Debian 4.0.
Do you use the 2.6.18 kernel? (If you are not sure, look at the output
that you get when you run "uname -a" in a terminal.)
> I do not know how to find what is the network card driver (the name of
Hello.
I have an HP/Compaq NX5000 laptop, that I dual boot into Windows XP Pro and
Debian 4.0.
The network access is okay with Windows XP, but works only intermittently with
Debian.
I am wondering whether something is wrong with the network card driver in
Debian 4.0.
I do not know how
Hi *,
On 1/31/07, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi *,
I have bought a Toshiba Satellite M115 Laptop, and I'm getting lots of
problems with the Ethernet Network card [ RTL8101E (Fast Ethernet
with PCI-Express interface)].
I have downloaded the
Hi *,
I have bought a Toshiba Satellite M115 Laptop, and I'm getting lots of
problems with the Ethernet Network card [ RTL8101E (Fast Ethernet
with PCI-Express interface)].
I have downloaded the driver from realtek.com.tw and I have followed
the steps which appear in README file:
Th
language, keymap, etc. the
> > installer scans my laptop for a network card but doesn't find one.
> >
> > I am then prompted to choose the card's driver from a list. I select
> > 3c574_cs .. the installer performs another silent round of scanning and
> > r
cga2000([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I am trying to do an etch netinst on a Dell Inspiron with a 3Com PC
> NIC/modem combo PC card.
>
> After choosing a couple of things such as language, keymap, etc. the
> installer scans my laptop for a network card but d
Try pcnet_cs
m°
I am trying to do an etch netinst on a Dell Inspiron with a 3Com PC
NIC/modem combo PC card.
After choosing a couple of things such as language, keymap, etc. the
installer scans my laptop for a network card but doesn't find one.
I am then prompted to choose the card's driver from
> On Thu August 25 2005 06:52 am, RAZEK wrote:
> Thanks for the tip. I did go buy this card and built the madwifi
> package and it seems to work quite well. Looking back I think the
> 3com card was also working, I just didn't know how to configure
> debian to get it up and running. I have an open u
On Monday 29 August 2005 21:19, Alan Ianson wrote:
>
> Thanks for the tip. I did go buy this card and built the madwifi package
> and it seems to work quite well. Looking back I think the 3com card was
> also working, I just didn't know how to configure debian to get it up and
> running. I have an
On Thu August 25 2005 06:52 am, RAZEK wrote:
> El mié, 24-08-2005 a las 09:27 -0700, Alan Ianson escribió:
> > Hello List,
> >
> > I would like to get wireless access working on my laptop, an hp pavilion
> > ze4400. When I bought the laptop it was running windows with a 3com
> > 3crshpw196 that was
El mié, 24-08-2005 a las 09:27 -0700, Alan Ianson escribió:
> Hello List,
>
> I would like to get wireless access working on my laptop, an hp pavilion
> ze4400. When I bought the laptop it was running windows with a 3com
> 3crshpw196 that was working, but now I have debian Sarge (stable) install
Jaromir Moskvan:
>
> the Netgear WG511 is definitely supported
Unfortunately this isn't true anymore. Netgear decided to switch away
from the well-supported prism54 chipset to something else without
changing the model name or even the PCI-ID (which makes the Linux kernel
think it is prism54 altho
Also sprach Alan Ianson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:27:31
-0700):
> Hello List,
Hello
> I would like to get wireless access working on my laptop, an hp
> pavilion ze4400. When I bought the laptop it was running windows with
> a 3com 3crshpw196 that was working, but now I have debi
Hi,
the Netgear WG511 is definitely supported and works well on my laptop. But
there are a lot cards supported.
The best is, if you get a card with a prism54 chipset. You can check the site
"http://prism54.org/supported_cards.php"; for supported cards.
But try first your card again. It should
Hello List,
I would like to get wireless access working on my laptop, an hp pavilion
ze4400. When I bought the laptop it was running windows with a 3com
3crshpw196 that was working, but now I have debian Sarge (stable) installed
and I'm not sure but I don't think this card is supported. LSPCI d
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 09:14:57AM -0500, Dan Elliott wrote:
> Andrew McMillan wrote:
>> On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 21:22 -0500, Dan Elliott wrote:
>>> Assuming I have surmised the correct Rev, dlink says my card uses the
>>> Prism chip set. According to Andrew's post the card should work with
>>> th
Andrew McMillan wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 21:22 -0500, Dan Elliott wrote:
According to the pictures found at
http://support.dlink.com/products/revision.asp my wireless card should
be one of DWL-650 Rev A1-J3.
Assuming I have surmised the correct Rev, dlink says my card uses the
Prism chi
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 21:22 -0500, Dan Elliott wrote:
>
> According to the pictures found at
> http://support.dlink.com/products/revision.asp my wireless card should
> be one of DWL-650 Rev A1-J3.
>
> Assuming I have surmised the correct Rev, dlink says my card uses the
> Prism chip set. Acco
Samuel Díaz García wrote:
Take a look here:
http://acx100.sourceforge.net/
I think it can help you.
Andrew McMillan writes:
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 15:44 -0500, Dan Elliott wrote:
Hello,
I am relatively new to Debian. I have Debian Woody installed on an
IBM Thinkpad. I have a D-Link DWL-650
This was sent directly to me. I thought the information was very helpful.
Original Message
Subject:Re: new debian user trouble with dwl-650 wireless network card
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:18:04 -0700
From: Rod Waldren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dan Elliott &
Take a look here:
http://acx100.sourceforge.net/
I think it can help you.
Andrew McMillan writes:
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 15:44 -0500, Dan Elliott wrote:
Hello,
I am relatively new to Debian. I have Debian Woody installed on an IBM
Thinkpad. I have a D-Link DWL-650 wireless ethernet card.
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 15:44 -0500, Dan Elliott wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am relatively new to Debian. I have Debian Woody installed on an IBM
> Thinkpad. I have a D-Link DWL-650 wireless ethernet card. I have found
> information via Google which seems to indicate Woody should support this
> devi
Hello,
I am relatively new to Debian. I have Debian Woody installed on an IBM
Thinkpad. I have a D-Link DWL-650 wireless ethernet card. I have found
information via Google which seems to indicate Woody should support this
device.
Given that I am new, I am looking for advice on where to be
Will Ness wrote:
> The network card is of pcmcia make. I managed to get it to identify
> and use the correct driver, and my pcmcia daemon is running.
Try to make it work manually according to PCMCIA-HOWTO, then you will find
whether it works or not.
> As for the X-windows, 'sta
On Thursday 26 May 2005 03:28, Will Ness wrote:
> Anyways I managed to
> get the network card and X-windows working. I then later (today) did a
> dist-upgrade. Now none of the above works. I would like to get all
> three working again.
...
> It claims that 'interfaces'
Hello All!!
I have some vexing problems that I have tried to solve on my own, and
I am at last beyond my capabilities
Ok heres the sitrep:
My system is setup on a Compaq Presario 1230. You may rember me
posting issues on this machine months earlier. Anyways I managed to
get the network card
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 08:32 +, Loz wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm reposting this as I've still got the problem, and dispite all my
> attempts, I cannot find a solution. Can anyone help me?
>
> I am running the Demudi AGNULA 1.2.0 distribution, which is a custom
> audio-related kernel based on a snapshot
please ask.
Thanks in advance.
Loz
-- Forwarded message --
From: Loz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:19:17 +
Subject: [a-users] wireless network card / pcmcia support
To: AGNULA user forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks to those who helped. Now I've got
a child or well trained dog.
Thanks
Loz
-- Forwarded message --
From: Loz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:19:17 +
Subject: [a-users] wireless network card / pcmcia support
To: AGNULA user forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks to those who helped. N
RRPotratz wrote:
Sverre Helge Bolstad wrote:
hi,
Im trying to install debian for the first time on a Compaq Armada
4210t, 3Gb HD, 96Mb RAM, P233, laptop without CDR-drive and with the
network card in the docking bay.
I get as far as to configure the network before installing the base
system
Sverre Helge Bolstad wrote:
hi,
Im trying to install debian for the first time on a Compaq Armada
4210t, 3Gb HD, 96Mb RAM, P233, laptop without CDR-drive and with the
network card in the docking bay.
I get as far as to configure the network before installing the base
system. Im using a floppy
hi,
Im trying to install debian for the first time on a Compaq Armada
4210t, 3Gb HD, 96Mb RAM, P233, laptop without CDR-drive and with the
network card in the docking bay.
I get as far as to configure the network before installing the base
system. Im using a floppy network install with 6
Booting with Debian installer (110MB image) is
successful, but... No support for my network card...
Google says that drivers for linux are available as
tar.gz
What about availability of the drivers for this
network card?
Is there a way to load any module to wake it up?
Should I wait for
Booting with Debian installer (110MB image) is
successful, but... No support for my network card...
Google says that drivers for linux are available as
tar.gz
What about availability of the drivers for this
network card?
Is there a way to load any module to wake it up?
Should I wait for
Problem: pcmcia NIC doesn't work
stuff I know: pcmcia_cs module is installed and
pcmcia_core (unless these are the same thing ;)) 8139too module is installed and
ive edited /etc/modules to run it on startup.
If I do ifconfig eth0 i get an error message "eth0:
error fetching interface informat
Problem: pcmcia NIC doesn't work
stuff I know: pcmcia_cs module is installed and
pcmcia_core (unless these are the same thing ;)) 8139too module is installed and
ive edited /etc/modules to run it on startup.
If I do ifconfig eth0 i get an error message "eth0:
error fetching interface informat
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 18:00:34 +0200
"Bob Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Friends,
> I am trying to get Sarge installed on my brand new Thinkpad T40.
>
> This little gem has an "Intel(r) Pro/1000 MT Mobile Connection" Gigabit
> Ethernet card on board.
>
> I am not able to get this wor
Hi,
had similar problems with a Dell PC - the onboard Intel Ethernet card wasn't
supported 'out of the box'.
You'll have to download the sources from Intel
http://appsr.intel.com/scripts-df/filter_results.asp?strOSs=39&strTypes=PLU%2CDRV%2CUTL&ProductID=871&OSFullName=Linux*&submit=Go%21
and com
Dear Friends,
I am trying to get Sarge installed on my brand new Thinkpad T40.
This little gem has an "Intel(r) Pro/1000 MT Mobile Connection" Gigabit
Ethernet card on board.
I am not able to get this working and am therefore stuck since Sarge netinst
CD works but has no network and Sarge full IS
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 18:00:34 +0200
"Bob Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Friends,
> I am trying to get Sarge installed on my brand new Thinkpad T40.
>
> This little gem has an "Intel(r) Pro/1000 MT Mobile Connection" Gigabit
> Ethernet card on board.
>
> I am not able to get this wor
Hi,
had similar problems with a Dell PC - the onboard Intel Ethernet card wasn't
supported 'out of the box'.
You'll have to download the sources from Intel
http://appsr.intel.com/scripts-df/filter_results.asp?strOSs=39&strTypes=PLU%2CDRV%2CUTL&ProductID=871&OSFullName=Linux*&submit=Go%21
and com
Dear Friends,
I am trying to get Sarge installed on my brand new Thinkpad T40.
This little gem has an "Intel(r) Pro/1000 MT Mobile Connection" Gigabit
Ethernet card on board.
I am not able to get this working and am therefore stuck since Sarge netinst
CD works but has no network and Sarge full IS
From: "tony godshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> When I was using pcmcia networking, I recall putting network config into
> /etc/pcmcia/network.opts instead of /etc/network/interfaces .
>
> Is this the debian way or does it subvert it?
>
> It did work. When my card was inserted, it configured, and wh
Hi, all.
When I was using pcmcia networking, I recall putting network config into
/etc/pcmcia/network.opts instead of /etc/network/interfaces .
Is this the debian way or does it subvert it?
It did work. When my card was inserted, it configured, and when it was
ejected, it deconfigured.
So my q
On Thu, 01 May 2003 14:16:56 +1000
Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've installed and used the pcmcia-cs package on debian.
>
> When i plug a 3com 3c589c pcmcia NIC in, then the card
> is detected and started, but to get it to appear as eth0
> in "ifconfig", i need to do /etc/init
>Hi,
>I've installed and used the pcmcia-cs package on debian.
>
>When i plug a 3com 3c589c pcmcia NIC in, then the card
>is detected and started, but to get it to appear as eth0
>in "ifconfig", i need to do /etc/init.d/networking restart.
>Is there a standard way of making this happen automaticall
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
--- Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi,
I've installed and used the pcmcia-cs package on debian.
When i plug a 3com 3c589c pcmcia NIC in, then the card
is detected and started, but to get it to appear as eth0
in "ifconfig", i need to do /etc/init.d/networki
--- Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi,
> I've installed and used the pcmcia-cs package on debian.
>
> When i plug a 3com 3c589c pcmcia NIC in, then the card
> is detected and started, but to get it to appear as eth0
> in "ifconfig", i need to do /etc/init.d/networking restart.
> Is
Hi,
I've installed and used the pcmcia-cs package on debian.
When i plug a 3com 3c589c pcmcia NIC in, then the card
is detected and started, but to get it to appear as eth0
in "ifconfig", i need to do /etc/init.d/networking restart.
Is there a standard way of making this happen automatically?
On Sun, 6 Apr 2003 22:01:26 +0200
mi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joel HATSCH [Sonntag, 6. April 2003 18:07]:
> >| I had to recompile the modules AND the kernel 'cos it was
> >complaining| about version mismatches between modules (2.4.28) and
should of course read 2.4.18 !!
> >kernel| (2.4.18-bf2
Joel HATSCH [Sonntag, 6. April 2003 18:07]:
>| I had to recompile the modules AND the kernel 'cos it was complaining
>| about version mismatches between modules (2.4.28) and kernel
>| (2.4.18-bf24). Shouldn't kernels now be able to handle modules from
>| other versions
As i understood it,
> After I finally broke off the adaptor-cable of my old network-card, I
> now have a new noname 8139-based one.
> Problem is, that the cardmgr can find and activate the card, but does
> not load the required modules or start the interface. The card works
> just fine, if I modpr
I have to apologize. I don't know why, i didn't read it carefully, bit it's
said even in the HOWTOs and Readme's that Cardbus cards are the 32 bit 3,3
Volt technology, where the 'older' (5 Volt) PCMCIA cards are 16 bit.
As i understand it now, both can be Type II or Type III formats, possibly
lo
I have to apologize. I don't know why, i didn't read it carefully, bit it's
said even in the HOWTOs and Readme's that Cardbus cards are the 32 bit 3,3
Volt technology, where the 'older' (5 Volt) PCMCIA cards are 16 bit.
As i understand it now, both can be Type II or Type III formats, possibly
lo
Thomas Friedrichsmeier [Donnerstag, 3. April 2003 11:03]:
>| Apr 2 19:03:30 flyer cardmgr[2086]: starting, version is 3.1.33
>| Apr 2 19:03:31 flyer cardmgr[2086]: watching 2 sockets
>| Apr 2 19:03:31 flyer cardmgr[2086]: Card Services release does not match
>| Apr 2 19:03:31 flyer cardmgr[2086
Thomas Friedrichsmeier [Donnerstag, 3. April 2003 11:03]:
>| Apr 2 19:03:30 flyer cardmgr[2086]: starting, version is 3.1.33
>| Apr 2 19:03:31 flyer cardmgr[2086]: watching 2 sockets
>| Apr 2 19:03:31 flyer cardmgr[2086]: Card Services release does not match
>| Apr 2 19:03:31 flyer cardmgr[2086
On Thursday 03 April 2003 02:24, Ben Lau wrote:
> Please post your /var/log/daemon.log.
Well, it used to be:
Apr 2 19:03:30 flyer cardmgr[2086]: starting, version is 3.1.33
Apr 2 19:03:31 flyer cardmgr[2086]: watching 2 sockets
Apr 2 19:03:31 flyer cardmgr[2086]: Card Services release does
Hi!
> Assuming it's a cardbus card...
It claims to be one.
> >| Apr 2 14:42:52 flyer kernel: PCI: Enabling device 02:00.0 ( ->
> >| 0003)
>
> Seems not to be cardbus device! Is that all about ? Next, there should be
> cardmgr: entries like socket : ID string in the syslog; then cardmgr
> ex
On Thursday 03 April 2003 02:24, Ben Lau wrote:
> Please post your /var/log/daemon.log.
Well, it used to be:
Apr 2 19:03:30 flyer cardmgr[2086]: starting, version is 3.1.33
Apr 2 19:03:31 flyer cardmgr[2086]: watching 2 sockets
Apr 2 19:03:31 flyer cardmgr[2086]: Card Services release does
Hi!
> Assuming it's a cardbus card...
It claims to be one.
> >| Apr 2 14:42:52 flyer kernel: PCI: Enabling device 02:00.0 ( ->
> >| 0003)
>
> Seems not to be cardbus device! Is that all about ? Next, there should be
> cardmgr: entries like socket : ID string in the syslog; then cardmgr
> ex
Please post your /var/log/daemon.log.
Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
>>>I tried adding the following lines to /etc/pcmcia/config:
>>>device "8139too"
>>> class "network" module "net/8139too"
>>
>>
>>
>>Try removing "net/"
>>
>>
>>>card "NoName 10/100"
>>> manfid 0x
Hello,
Thomas Friedrichsmeier [Mittwoch, 2. April 2003 14:53]:
>| After I finally broke off the adaptor-cable of my old network-card, I now
>| have a new noname 8139-based one.
Assuming it's a cardbus card...
>| Problem is, that the cardmgr can find and activate the card, but does n
Please post your /var/log/daemon.log.
Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
>>>I tried adding the following lines to /etc/pcmcia/config:
>>>device "8139too"
>>> class "network" module "net/8139too"
>>
>>
>>
>>Try removing "net/"
>>
>>
>>>card "NoName 10/100"
>>> manfid 0x
Hello,
Thomas Friedrichsmeier [Mittwoch, 2. April 2003 14:53]:
>| After I finally broke off the adaptor-cable of my old network-card, I now
>| have a new noname 8139-based one.
Assuming it's a cardbus card...
>| Problem is, that the cardmgr can find and activate the card, but does n
> > I tried adding the following lines to /etc/pcmcia/config:
> > device "8139too"
> > class "network" module "net/8139too"
>
>
> Try removing "net/"
>
> >
> > card "NoName 10/100"
> > manfid 0x10ec, 0x8139
> > bind "8139too"
>
> You may want to add this to /e
> > I tried adding the following lines to /etc/pcmcia/config:
> > device "8139too"
> > class "network" module "net/8139too"
>
>
> Try removing "net/"
>
> >
> > card "NoName 10/100"
> > manfid 0x10ec, 0x8139
> > bind "8139too"
>
> You may want to add this to /e
Am Mit, 2003-04-02 um 14.53 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> Hi!
>
> After I finally broke off the adaptor-cable of my old network-card, I now
> have
> a new noname 8139-based one.
> Problem is, that the cardmgr can find and activate the card, but does not
> load
>
Hi!
After I finally broke off the adaptor-cable of my old network-card, I now have
a new noname 8139-based one.
Problem is, that the cardmgr can find and activate the card, but does not load
the required modules or start the interface. The card works just fine, if I
modprobe the 8139too-module
Am Mit, 2003-04-02 um 14.53 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> Hi!
>
> After I finally broke off the adaptor-cable of my old network-card, I now have
> a new noname 8139-based one.
> Problem is, that the cardmgr can find and activate the card, but does not load
> the require
Hi!
After I finally broke off the adaptor-cable of my old network-card, I now have
a new noname 8139-based one.
Problem is, that the cardmgr can find and activate the card, but does not load
the required modules or start the interface. The card works just fine, if I
modprobe the 8139too-module
Hi everyone, this is my first time in.
I´ve got a laptop with a mini PCI combo drive which
includes a Lucent winmoden and a Accton EN2242 network card which i can not
configure.
The version of my kernel is 2.4.20 and i have the
tulip driver loaded.
Sometimes the machine recognizes the card
Hi everyone, this is my first time in.
I´ve got a laptop with a mini PCI combo drive which
includes a Lucent winmoden and a Accton EN2242 network card which i can not
configure.
The version of my kernel is 2.4.20 and i have the
tulip driver loaded.
Sometimes the machine recognizes the card
Hello David !
D.Emerson:
> Well maybe next message I'll change the subject to "network config"...
:-)
> Card Recognized! problems with debian packaging... isn't that why I decided
> on debian rather than Mandrake? It was because I was expecting the
> packaging to work better... hmph.
I did exper
Hello David !
D.Emerson:
> Well maybe next message I'll change the subject to "network config"...
:-)
> Card Recognized! problems with debian packaging... isn't that why I decided
> on debian rather than Mandrake? It was because I was expecting the
> packaging to work better... hmph.
I did exper
Hi Micha,
Well maybe next message I'll change the subject to "network config"...
Card Recognized! problems with debian packaging... isn't that why I decided on
debian rather than Mandrake? It was because I was expecting the packaging to
work better... hmph.
Of course the network stuff isn't co
Hi Micha,
Well maybe next message I'll change the subject to "network config"...
Card Recognized! problems with debian packaging... isn't that why I decided on debian
rather than Mandrake? It was because I was expecting the packaging to work better...
hmph.
Of course the network stuff isn't co
ardmgr
> gives the message "could not open 'config': No such file or directory
> But I also don't know what file to edit that modifies bootup sequences.
> But since it can't open up config, I don't think it's even trying to
> identify the card. On my v
ardmgr
> gives the message "could not open 'config': No such file or directory
> But I also don't know what file to edit that modifies bootup sequences.
> But since it can't open up config, I don't think it's even trying to
> identify the card. On my v
/pcmcia/config MUST be sourced, because during bootup, cardmgr
gives the message "could not open 'config': No such file or directory
But I also don't know what file to edit that modifies bootup sequences.
But since it can't open up config, I don't think it's even
/pcmcia/config MUST be sourced, because during bootup, cardmgr gives the
message "could not open 'config': No such file or directory
But I also don't know what file to edit that modifies bootup sequences.
But since it can't open up config, I don't think it's even
i82365 is a modular pcmcia-cs socket driver from this package ?
> and modprobe is successful.
In /etc/modutils/ether, try to define alias eth0 3c589_cs
(don't forget update-modules afterw.)
> # cardctl ident
> Socket 0:
> no product info available
> Socket 1:
> no pro
i82365 is a modular pcmcia-cs socket driver from this package ?
> and modprobe is successful.
In /etc/modutils/ether, try to define alias eth0 3c589_cs
(don't forget update-modules afterw.)
> # cardctl ident
> Socket 0:
> no product info available
> Socket 1:
> no pro
2 2
pcmcia_core45824 0 [3c589_cs ds i82365]
and modprobe is successful.
# cardctl ident
Socket 0:
no product info available
Socket 1:
no product info available
(Socket 0 holds the network card, Socket 1 is currently empty.)
I have no /var/lib/pcmcia directory, thus couldn't
update...
I tried to install the pcmcia-modules-2.2.20 package, and it told me I had a
different kernel-image than it wanted. I figured out that I'm running
kernel-image 2.2.20 (#1) and the module was expecting 2.2.20 (#6) ... a world
of difference, I guess.
So I downloaded a newer kernel imag
2 2
pcmcia_core45824 0 [3c589_cs ds i82365]
and modprobe is successful.
# cardctl ident
Socket 0:
no product info available
Socket 1:
no product info available
(Socket 0 holds the network card, Socket 1 is currently empty.)
I have no /var/lib/pcmcia directory, thus couldn't
update...
I tried to install the pcmcia-modules-2.2.20 package, and it told me I had a different
kernel-image than it wanted. I figured out that I'm running kernel-image 2.2.20 (#1)
and the module was expecting 2.2.20 (#6) ... a world of difference, I guess.
So I downloaded a newer kernel image
At 10:59 AM 2/9/03, Marc Mongeon wrote:
>I'll try to address what I think is the fundamental problem: your PCMCIA
>modules are not installed.
>
>The package you want to install is "pcmcia-modules-2.2.xx" [...]
Still not workin' ... apt-get install pcmcia-modules-2.2.20 gave me exactly the
same e
At 10:59 AM 2/9/03, Marc Mongeon wrote:
>I'll try to address what I think is the fundamental problem: your PCMCIA
>modules are not installed.
>
>The package you want to install is "pcmcia-modules-2.2.xx" [...]
Still not workin' ... apt-get install pcmcia-modules-2.2.20 gave me exactly the same
e
You can keep the package names from being truncated by doing this:
sirius:~$ columns=120;dpkg -l package*|less
Kevin
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 12:59:27 -0600
Marc Mongeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll try to address what I think is the fundamental problem: your
> PCMCIA modules are not installed.
You can keep the package names from being truncated by doing this:
sirius:~$ columns=120;dpkg -l package*|less
Kevin
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 12:59:27 -0600
Marc Mongeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll try to address what I think is the fundamental problem: your
> PCMCIA modules are not installed.
I'll try to address what I think is the fundamental problem: your PCMCIA
modules are not installed.
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:29:52PM -0800, David Emerson wrote:
> I'll start with what appears (to my ignr'nt eyes) to be the problem:
>
> /lib/modules/2.2.20/pcmcia/ does not exist.
>
> /etc/p
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Karl Eklund wrote:
I'm not sure about this case, but in my experience, the hostap prismII
driver is much better than both the kernel, or the linux-wlan-ng
drivers. I've used all three for extended periods of time, and the only
feature complete and well-wor
Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 00:36, Weinzierl Stefan wrote:
> > Karl Eklund schrieb:
> > > Sometimes (maybe once every day) the transfer speed goes down to about
> > > 12 kB/s (the connection is much faster) and it's slow to do several
> > > things at the sam
I'll try to address what I think is the fundamental problem: your PCMCIA
modules are not installed.
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:29:52PM -0800, David Emerson wrote:
> I'll start with what appears (to my ignr'nt eyes) to be the problem:
>
> /lib/modules/2.2.20/pcmcia/ does not exist.
>
> /etc/p
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Karl Eklund wrote:
I'm not sure about this case, but in my experience, the hostap prismII
driver is much better than both the kernel, or the linux-wlan-ng
drivers. I've used all three for extended periods of time, and the only
feature complete and well-wor
Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 00:36, Weinzierl Stefan wrote:
> > Karl Eklund schrieb:
> > > Sometimes (maybe once every day) the transfer speed goes down to about
> > > 12 kB/s (the connection is much faster) and it's slow to do several
> > > things at the sam
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
