Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM - solved

2004-02-25 Thread Martin Wegmann
On Wednesday 25 February 2004 00:06, Miroslav Maiksnar wrote: > Dne út 24. února 2004 14:32 Martin Wegmann napsal(a): > > [...] > > > > /sbin/lilo > > Fatal: open /vmlinuz: No such file or directory > > > > but /vmlinuz definitely exists as ls -l under / reveals > > > > lrwxrwxrwx1 root roo

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM - solved

2004-02-25 Thread Martin Wegmann
On Wednesday 25 February 2004 00:06, Miroslav Maiksnar wrote: > Dne út 24. února 2004 14:32 Martin Wegmann napsal(a): > > [...] > > > > /sbin/lilo > > Fatal: open /vmlinuz: No such file or directory > > > > but /vmlinuz definitely exists as ls -l under / reveals > > > > lrwxrwxrwx1 root roo

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-24 Thread Miroslav Maiksnar
Dne út 24. února 2004 14:32 Martin Wegmann napsal(a): > [...] > > /sbin/lilo > Fatal: open /vmlinuz: No such file or directory > > but /vmlinuz definitely exists as ls -l under / reveals > > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 24 Feb 23 19:18 vmlinuz -> > boot/vmlinuz-2.6.2-1-686 > lrwxrwxrwx

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-24 Thread Miroslav Maiksnar
Dne út 24. února 2004 14:32 Martin Wegmann napsal(a): > [...] > > /sbin/lilo > Fatal: open /vmlinuz: No such file or directory > > but /vmlinuz definitely exists as ls -l under / reveals > > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 24 Feb 23 19:18 vmlinuz -> > boot/vmlinuz-2.6.2-1-686 > lrwxrwxrwx

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-24 Thread Martin Wegmann
On Monday 23 February 2004 22:50, Miroslav Maiksnar wrote: > Dne po 23. února 2004 15:57 Martin Wegmann napsal(a): [snip] > lba32 > boot=/dev/hda > root=/dev/hda5# Replace with your root partition > default=Linux > > image=/vmlinuz > label=Linux > read-only > initrd=/ini

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-24 Thread Martin Wegmann
On Monday 23 February 2004 22:50, Miroslav Maiksnar wrote: > Dne po 23. února 2004 15:57 Martin Wegmann napsal(a): [snip] > lba32 > boot=/dev/hda > root=/dev/hda5# Replace with your root partition > default=Linux > > image=/vmlinuz > label=Linux > read-only > initrd=/ini

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Miroslav Maiksnar
Dne po 23. února 2004 15:57 Martin Wegmann napsal(a): > >As a reminder, in order to configure LILO, you need > >to add an 'initrd=/initrd.img' to the image=/vmlinuz > >stanza of your /etc/lilo.conf > > > > I added this line to /etc/lilo.conf (marked with ->) > > > > image=/boot/vmlinuz-

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Miroslav Maiksnar
Dne po 23. února 2004 15:57 Martin Wegmann napsal(a): > >As a reminder, in order to configure LILO, you need > >to add an 'initrd=/initrd.img' to the image=/vmlinuz > >stanza of your /etc/lilo.conf > > > > I added this line to /etc/lilo.conf (marked with ->) > > > > image=/boot/vmlinuz-

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Martin Wegmann
>As a reminder, in order to configure LILO, you need >to add an 'initrd=/initrd.img' to the image=/vmlinuz >stanza of your /etc/lilo.conf > > I added this line to /etc/lilo.conf (marked with ->) > > image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-xfs > label=Linux > initrd=/boot/initrd.gz >

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Martin Wegmann
On Monday 23 February 2004 15:08, Lukas Ruf wrote: [snip] > > > however, you need to take care of not upgrading X. I took me some > > > time to get back to 4.2 after 4.3 crashed the screen output > > > totally. > > > > when I mark kernel-image-2.6.2-1-686 for installation just hotplug > > has to b

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Lukas Ruf
Martin, > Martin Wegmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-23 14:41]: > > On Monday 23 February 2004 09:45, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > > Miroslav Maiksnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-22 18:48]: > > > > > > Hi, AFAIK, there are no problems when upgrading kernel, even > > > from 2.4 to 2.6. There may be possi

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Martin Wegmann
On Monday 23 February 2004 09:45, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > Miroslav Maiksnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-22 18:48]: > > > > Hi, AFAIK, there are no problems when upgrading kernel, even from > > 2.4 to 2.6. There may be possible problem with 2.6 kernel on your > > IBM, but there is always possibility t

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Martin Wegmann
>As a reminder, in order to configure LILO, you need >to add an 'initrd=/initrd.img' to the image=/vmlinuz >stanza of your /etc/lilo.conf > > I added this line to /etc/lilo.conf (marked with ->) > > image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-xfs > label=Linux > initrd=/boot/initrd.gz >

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Martin Wegmann
On Monday 23 February 2004 15:08, Lukas Ruf wrote: [snip] > > > however, you need to take care of not upgrading X. I took me some > > > time to get back to 4.2 after 4.3 crashed the screen output > > > totally. > > > > when I mark kernel-image-2.6.2-1-686 for installation just hotplug > > has to b

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Lukas Ruf
Martin, > Martin Wegmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-23 14:41]: > > On Monday 23 February 2004 09:45, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > > Miroslav Maiksnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-22 18:48]: > > > > > > Hi, AFAIK, there are no problems when upgrading kernel, even > > > from 2.4 to 2.6. There may be possi

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Martin Wegmann
On Monday 23 February 2004 09:45, Lukas Ruf wrote: > > Miroslav Maiksnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-22 18:48]: > > > > Hi, AFAIK, there are no problems when upgrading kernel, even from > > 2.4 to 2.6. There may be possible problem with 2.6 kernel on your > > IBM, but there is always possibility t

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Lukas Ruf
> Miroslav Maiksnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-22 18:48]: > > Hi, AFAIK, there are no problems when upgrading kernel, even from > 2.4 to 2.6. There may be possible problem with 2.6 kernel on your > IBM, but there is always possibility to boot old kernel if new does > not work. In lilo prompt type

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-23 Thread Lukas Ruf
> Miroslav Maiksnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-22 18:48]: > > Hi, AFAIK, there are no problems when upgrading kernel, even from > 2.4 to 2.6. There may be possible problem with 2.6 kernel on your > IBM, but there is always possibility to boot old kernel if new does > not work. In lilo prompt type

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-22 Thread Miroslav Maiksnar
Hi, AFAIK, there are no problems when upgrading kernel, even from 2.4 to 2.6. There may be possible problem with 2.6 kernel on your IBM, but there is always possibility to boot old kernel if new does not work. In lilo prompt type linuxold (if you don't have enabled boot menu, it is reacheable by ho

Re: kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-22 Thread Miroslav Maiksnar
Hi, AFAIK, there are no problems when upgrading kernel, even from 2.4 to 2.6. There may be possible problem with 2.6 kernel on your IBM, but there is always possibility to boot old kernel if new does not work. In lilo prompt type linuxold (if you don't have enabled boot menu, it is reacheable by ho

kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-22 Thread Martin Wegmann
Hello, I am really tempted to upgrade my kernel but in the same moment I am afraid of loosing my data ( the usual problem ;-) ). I searched the web for kernel upgrades to 2.6.2 on a already running debian (especially on an IBM T40). The majority of pages I found were description of problems

kernel-image 2.6.2 T 40 IBM

2004-02-22 Thread Martin Wegmann
Hello, I am really tempted to upgrade my kernel but in the same moment I am afraid of loosing my data ( the usual problem ;-) ). I searched the web for kernel upgrades to 2.6.2 on a already running debian (especially on an IBM T40). The majority of pages I found were description of problems