Hello again,
To get the new ati driver working I installed XFree86 4.2.0 from the binary
distribution from xfree86.org following the mini-HOWTO on mobilix.org. Now I
can run the new ati driver but no modules are being loaded on X startup. The
output of X is therefore pretty short.
So, my questi
Hello again,
To get the new ati driver working I installed XFree86 4.2.0 from the binary
distribution from xfree86.org following the mini-HOWTO on mobilix.org. Now I can run
the new ati driver but no modules are being loaded on X startup. The output of X is
therefore pretty short.
So, my quest
OK, following all your helpful comments I now have a fulling working kernel
2.4.18 + pcmcia-cs built from sources.
And the DRM kernel modules compiled and installed without any problems.
But then, when trying to restart the X server I get the following error:
/usr/bin/startxfce: Starting X serve
OK, following all your helpful comments I now have a fulling working kernel 2.4.18 +
pcmcia-cs built from sources.
And the DRM kernel modules compiled and installed without any problems.
But then, when trying to restart the X server I get the following error:
/usr/bin/startxfce: Starting X serv
try
make-kpkg modules_images
from within /usr/src/linux with the pcmcia source in
/usr/src/modules/pcmcia...
that should build a kernel-modules-xx.deb which you can then install.
also read the documentation of make-kpkg which also makes handling different
kernels a lot easier.
greets Ben
Thanks.
I found the .config for my stock kernel also in the kernel-headers-2.4.18 dir.
OK, now I have a working kernel. But pcmcia-cs is still lacking. Thus, I
installed pcmcia-source. This gives me a tarball pcmcia-cs.tar.gz in /usr/src.
I unpacked it, but when trying to "make all", it complains
try
make-kpkg modules_images
from within /usr/src/linux with the pcmcia source in
/usr/src/modules/pcmcia...
that should build a kernel-modules-xx.deb which you can then install.
also read the documentation of make-kpkg which also makes handling different
kernels a lot easier.
greets Be
Thanks.
I found the .config for my stock kernel also in the kernel-headers-2.4.18 dir.
OK, now I have a working kernel. But pcmcia-cs is still lacking. Thus, I installed
pcmcia-source. This gives me a tarball pcmcia-cs.tar.gz in /usr/src. I unpacked it,
but when trying to "make all", it complain
The .config for the stock kernels are in /boot/config-xx and in that case
you'll need the sources from the stock kernel. that means the
kernel-imgage-2.4.18-bf2.4.deb or something similar, i don't know the exact
name of the package.
but I'm not an expert here and maybe my guess is totally w
On Sun, 06 Oct 2002 18:22:32 +0200, Philipp Haller writes:
>my stock 2.4.18-bf2.4. Can I get the .config for the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel from
>somewhere? Because this would be a good starting point for the new configurati
>on.
they're in /boot/config-something.
regards
az
--
+ Alexander Zangerl +
Benjamin Fritzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looks to me like yu don't have the linux sources on your machine.
> get the linux sources an make a .config file according to your kernel.
I unpacked sources and configured a new kernel. I built several kernels with
varying .config files. The probl
The .config for the stock kernels are in /boot/config-xx and in that case
you'll need the sources from the stock kernel. that means the
kernel-imgage-2.4.18-bf2.4.deb or something similar, i don't know the exact
name of the package.
but I'm not an expert here and maybe my guess is totally
On Sun, 06 Oct 2002 18:22:32 +0200, Philipp Haller writes:
>my stock 2.4.18-bf2.4. Can I get the .config for the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel from
>somewhere? Because this would be a good starting point for the new configurati
>on.
they're in /boot/config-something.
regards
az
--
+ Alexander Zangerl +
Benjamin Fritzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looks to me like yu don't have the linux sources on your machine.
> get the linux sources an make a .config file according to your kernel.
I unpacked sources and configured a new kernel. I built several kernels with varying
.config files. The prob
Hi,
on a related note, does gatos modules and dri.sf.net modules complete each other
or are they in conflict with each other? I'm a bit confused about these things.
I believe I have the same chip.
lspci says:
ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64)
Cheers.
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14
looks to me like yu don't have the linux sources on your machine.
get the linux sources an make a .config file according to your kernel.
if that doesn't help or you already have the sources check if they are
/usr/src/linux.
if that doesn't help then i don't know.
greets benny
On Sunday 06 Oct
Hi,
on a related note, does gatos modules and dri.sf.net modules complete each other
or are they in conflict with each other? I'm a bit confused about these things.
I believe I have the same chip.
lspci says:
ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64)
Cheers.
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 1
looks to me like yu don't have the linux sources on your machine.
get the linux sources an make a .config file according to your kernel.
if that doesn't help or you already have the sources check if they are
/usr/src/linux.
if that doesn't help then i don't know.
greets benny
On Sunday 06 Oc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 Jul 2002 8:02 pm, Valéry Febvre wrote:
> > I really hope one of you guys can help me, im all out of ideas.
>
> Yes, your chipset belong to mach64 chipset familly probably.
> Goto http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and download the
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:32:13 +0100
Tom Badran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a laptop (thinkpad a22m) with a rage mobility card. Depending on where
> i look (lspci, proc etc) it is reported as either a Rage Mobility LF, or a
> Rage Mobility P/M.
>
> I have x working nicely (very smooth dv
oks clean).
Any help available is appreciated.
http://excelsior.loopysoft.com/~entropy/Matts%20Fuckup.JPG
Thanks again,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:42 AM
To: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: Rage Mobility
(it looks clean).
Any help available is appreciated.
http://excelsior.loopysoft.com/~entropy/Matts%20Fuckup.JPG
Thanks again,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Rage Mobility
Ok guys,
Ok guys, thanks for the help. If you don't hear from me, everything went
well :)
Later,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Gyurko Szabolcs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:41 AM
To: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Rage Mobility
Because LILO accept
Ok guys, thanks for the help. If you don't hear from me, everything went
well :)
Later,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Gyurko Szabolcs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Rage Mobility
Because LILO accept only 0x f
Because LILO accept only 0x format at the prompt. If you enter the hex value
for 885 it'll work.
You can use the hex form in the config file too.
Bye.
Jon Leonard wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 06:27:48PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> > "Matt Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 06:27:48PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> "Matt Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have a IBM Laptop (A21P) with an ATI Mobility M3 (rev2, agp 2x, 16MB)
> > card, and I'm having trouble with X.
>
> Start by looking at Linux on IBM ThinkPad A20p
> http://www.zhl
Because LILO accept only 0x format at the prompt. If you enter the hex value
for 885 it'll work.
You can use the hex form in the config file too.
Bye.
Jon Leonard wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 06:27:48PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> > "Matt Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 06:27:48PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> "Matt Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have a IBM Laptop (A21P) with an ATI Mobility M3 (rev2, agp 2x, 16MB)
> > card, and I'm having trouble with X.
>
> Start by looking at Linux on IBM ThinkPad A20p
> http://www.zh
Vivek Dasmohapatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm told that w. 4.0.2 you don't need the fb console any more,
Correct. I haven't used the framebuffer since 4.0.1 sometime.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
Any time things appear to be going better, you have over
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Matt Reynolds wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a IBM Laptop (A21P) with an ATI Mobility M3 (rev2, agp 2x, 16MB)
> card, and I'm having trouble with X. My mastery of X windows and vid card
> config is pretty slim, so bear with me please.
Hmm - I think I saw just about every
"Matt Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a IBM Laptop (A21P) with an ATI Mobility M3 (rev2, agp 2x, 16MB)
> card, and I'm having trouble with X.
Start by looking at Linux on IBM ThinkPad A20p
http://www.zhlive.ch/zhl_contents_linux.html>. It's the same
video chipset, though I t
Vivek Dasmohapatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm told that w. 4.0.2 you don't need the fb console any more,
Correct. I haven't used the framebuffer since 4.0.1 sometime.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
Any time things appear to be going better, you have ove
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Matt Reynolds wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a IBM Laptop (A21P) with an ATI Mobility M3 (rev2, agp 2x, 16MB)
> card, and I'm having trouble with X. My mastery of X windows and vid card
> config is pretty slim, so bear with me please.
Hmm - I think I saw just about ever
"Matt Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a IBM Laptop (A21P) with an ATI Mobility M3 (rev2, agp 2x, 16MB)
> card, and I'm having trouble with X.
Start by looking at Linux on IBM ThinkPad A20p
http://www.zhlive.ch/zhl_contents_linux.html>. It's the same
video chipset, though I
34 matches
Mail list logo
