It works. Thanks to all.
Your (Mattia's) suggestion with the Intel PIIXn chipset was correct. But
now I think the name and the description of this driver isn't very good.
There are only things telling about PIO modes and nothing about DMA or
supported chipsets (like ICH3M in my case).
Thanks anyw
It works. Thanks to all.
Your (Mattia's) suggestion with the Intel PIIXn chipset was correct. But
now I think the name and the description of this driver isn't very good.
There are only things telling about PIO modes and nothing about DMA or
supported chipsets (like ICH3M in my case).
Thanks anyw
On 07 Jul 2003 10:32:39 +0200
Tautau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I know it's an Intel i845 chipset. But there's no Intel
> chipset in menuconfig except PIIXn and that's not the one i need.
> Surprisingly it worked with kernel 2.4.20 with slight problems but at
> leas it wast possible.
>
As far as I know it's an Intel i845 chipset. But there's no Intel
chipset in menuconfig except PIIXn and that's not the one i need.
Surprisingly it worked with kernel 2.4.20 with slight problems but at
leas it wast possible.
I don't know if this helps anyone to help me but here's lspci output:
00
Hi Marcel,
> "Marcel" == Marcel Gschwandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcel> A "hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda" reports: /dev/hda: setting
Marcel> using_dma to 1 (on) HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not
Marcel> permitted using_dma = 0 (off) Has anybody a hint why this
Marcel> can happen
On 07 Jul 2003 10:32:39 +0200
Tautau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I know it's an Intel i845 chipset. But there's no Intel
> chipset in menuconfig except PIIXn and that's not the one i need.
> Surprisingly it worked with kernel 2.4.20 with slight problems but at
> leas it wast possible.
>
As far as I know it's an Intel i845 chipset. But there's no Intel
chipset in menuconfig except PIIXn and that's not the one i need.
Surprisingly it worked with kernel 2.4.20 with slight problems but at
leas it wast possible.
I don't know if this helps anyone to help me but here's lspci output:
00
Hi Marcel,
> "Marcel" == Marcel Gschwandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcel> A "hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda" reports: /dev/hda: setting
Marcel> using_dma to 1 (on) HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not
Marcel> permitted using_dma = 0 (off) Has anybody a hint why this
Marcel> can happen
as far as I know the '*' doesn't indicate the current state of the Drive
it only indicates the standard setting of the Firmware. But some how
this isn't used in my case. And I suppose that if it would be already
enabled a "hdparm /dev/hda" wouldn't report this:
/dev/hda:
multcount= 16 (on)
I
as far as I know the '*' doesn't indicate the current state of the Drive
it only indicates the standard setting of the Firmware. But some how
this isn't used in my case. And I suppose that if it would be already
enabled a "hdparm /dev/hda" wouldn't report this:
/dev/hda:
multcount= 16 (on)
I
I think (but don't quote me) that there is a problem with DMA in 2.4.21
works fine in 2.4.20, maybe try that
Ben.
Marcel Gschwandl wrote:
Hi again,
I was root. As non root I would get
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Permission denied
and not
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
thanks an
I think (but don't quote me) that there is a problem with DMA in 2.4.21
works fine in 2.4.20, maybe try that
Ben.
Marcel Gschwandl wrote:
Hi again,
I was root. As non root I would get
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Permission denied
and not
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
thanks anyway
This shouldn't be a problem because my laptop is an IBM A31p which means
P4-M 2.0GHz and an Intel i845 chipset.
And I know this configuration works because to of my friends have the
same notebook and it works just fine there. But we were not able to
figure out what's the difference between their m
the HD should be able to handle DMA because I was able to enable it with
hdparm and an kernel 2.4.20.
output of "hdparm -I /dev/hda":
/dev/hda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: IC25T060ATCS05-0
Serial Number: CSL805DEG81H2A
Firmware Revision:
Quoting Marcel Gschwandl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi again,
>
> I was root. As non root I would get
> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Permission denied
> and not
> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
>
have you tried querying the drive with hdparm -I?
This should give you some indication of if can h
This shouldn't be a problem because my laptop is an IBM A31p which means
P4-M 2.0GHz and an Intel i845 chipset.
And I know this configuration works because to of my friends have the
same notebook and it works just fine there. But we were not able to
figure out what's the difference between their m
the HD should be able to handle DMA because I was able to enable it with
hdparm and an kernel 2.4.20.
output of "hdparm -I /dev/hda":
/dev/hda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: IC25T060ATCS05-0
Serial Number: CSL805DEG81H2A
Firmware Revision:
Quoting Marcel Gschwandl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi again,
>
> I was root. As non root I would get
> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Permission denied
> and not
> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
>
have you tried querying the drive with hdparm -I?
This should give you some indication of if can h
Hi again,
I was root. As non root I would get
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Permission denied
and not
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
thanks anyway
Marcel
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 16:34, Klaus Rechert wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> try as root
>
> Klaus
>
>
> On 06 Jul 2003 16:19:06 +0200
> Ma
Hi,
try as root
Klaus
On 06 Jul 2003 16:19:06 +0200
Marcel Gschwandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I already asked about this issue once but didn't get any answers so I
> try it again.
>
> I have an IBM Thinkpad A31p with Debian sarge + some sid packages on it.
> Recent
Hi again,
I was root. As non root I would get
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Permission denied
and not
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
thanks anyway
Marcel
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 16:34, Klaus Rechert wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> try as root
>
> Klaus
>
>
> On 06 Jul 2003 16:19:06 +0200
> Ma
Hi,
try as root
Klaus
On 06 Jul 2003 16:19:06 +0200
Marcel Gschwandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I already asked about this issue once but didn't get any answers so I
> try it again.
>
> I have an IBM Thinkpad A31p with Debian sarge + some sid packages on it.
> Recent
22 matches
Mail list logo
