On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:17:23AM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> From: "Emma Jane Hogbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:47:37AM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> err...yeah. I follow the acpi-devel list and had been noting all the recent
> releases, but it hadn't actually occu
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:17:23AM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> From: "Emma Jane Hogbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:47:37AM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> err...yeah. I follow the acpi-devel list and had been noting all the recent
> releases, but it hadn't actually occu
From: "Emma Jane Hogbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:47:37AM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> > If you don't get those, you don't have the ACPU patches installed. The
> > subsystem revision date, above, should be at least in 2003 - patches
available
>
> Not necessarily. The la
From: "Emma Jane Hogbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:47:37AM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> > If you don't get those, you don't have the ACPU patches installed. The
> > subsystem revision date, above, should be at least in 2003 - patches
available
>
> Not necessarily. The la
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:47:37AM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> If you don't get those, you don't have the ACPU patches installed. The
> subsystem revision date, above, should be at least in 2003 - patches available
Not necessarily. The latest patch for the 2.4.20 kernel is 20021212. I'm
not s
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:47:37AM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> If you don't get those, you don't have the ACPU patches installed. The
> subsystem revision date, above, should be at least in 2003 - patches available
Not necessarily. The latest patch for the 2.4.20 kernel is 20021212. I'm
not s
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 04:59:15PM -0400, Andre Berger wrote:
> * Jim Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2003-05-08 15:07 -0400:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 08:48:52AM -0400, Andre Berger wrote:
> > > * Jim Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2003-05-08 08:11 -0400:
> > > > On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 06:03:3
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 19:32:06 -0400
From: Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ACPI sleep/hibernation mode
On Thu, 08 May 2003 16:59:15 -0400
Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-3123
* Jim Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2003-05-08 15:07 -0400:
> On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 08:48:52AM -0400, Andre Berger wrote:
> > * Jim Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2003-05-08 08:11 -0400:
> > > On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 06:03:35PM +0200, Emil Pedersen wrote:
> > > > Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 08:48:52AM -0400, Andre Berger wrote:
> * Jim Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2003-05-08 08:11 -0400:
> > On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 06:03:35PM +0200, Emil Pedersen wrote:
> > > Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 07 May 2003 17:28:53 +0200
> > > > Emil Pedersen <[EM
* Jim Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2003-05-08 08:11 -0400:
> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 06:03:35PM +0200, Emil Pedersen wrote:
> > Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 07 May 2003 17:28:53 +0200
> > > Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > It doesn't sound too hopeful then, unles
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 06:03:35PM +0200, Emil Pedersen wrote:
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 07 May 2003 17:28:53 +0200
> > Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Actually I think that people stopped asking for that feature :P
> > > > AFAIR if you look into the small sourc
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Mattia Dongili wrote:
>It doesn't sound too hopeful then, unless I miss remember the free nv
>driver doesn't work with the geforce2go chip.
The woody one doesn't, but the one in sid does work with my
geforce2go. After closing the cover, I
From: "Emil Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > You should get "ACPI: Subsystem revision mmdd" and "ACPI: System [ACPI]
(
> > supports S0 ... S5)"
>
> Got that. But is the acpi patches really necessary for swsusp?
You're right. swsusp can be invoked directly - swsusp is required for support
o
Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> On Wed, 07 May 2003 17:28:53 +0200
> Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Actually I think that people stopped asking for that feature :P
> > > AFAIR if you look into the small sources available with the driver
> > > you should find something about suspend co
Derek Broughton wrote:
>
> From: "Emil Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Matìj Hausenblas wrote:
> > >
> > > I have some little trouble finding documentation on putting an purely ACPI
> (no
> > > APM support) laptop (Acer TravelMate 435LC) to sleep. The apm -s command
> > > doesn't work since a
On Wed, 07 May 2003 17:28:53 +0200
Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually I think that people stopped asking for that feature :P
> > AFAIR if you look into the small sources available with the driver
> > you should find something about suspend commented out (actually it's
> > quite
Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> On Wed, 07 May 2003 16:07:17 +0200
> Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am using nvidias (closed source) driver, but the problem is that I
> > can't suspend. There seems to be problem with nvidia on resumes that
> > can be solved by starting a fake x serve
On Wed, 07 May 2003 16:07:17 +0200
Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using nvidias (closed source) driver, but the problem is that I
> can't suspend. There seems to be problem with nvidia on resumes that
> can be solved by starting a fake x server, but I never get that far.
> The
Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> On Wed, 07 May 2003 15:09:50 +0200
> Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I don't know about NVidia drivers, but a chvt before suspending (and
> > > a chvt back to X upon resume) should do the trick
> >
> > That's what I thought too, but unfortunately it wasn
From: "Emil Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Matìj Hausenblas wrote:
> >
> > I have some little trouble finding documentation on putting an purely ACPI
(no
> > APM support) laptop (Acer TravelMate 435LC) to sleep. The apm -s command
> > doesn't work since apm isn't enabled.
> > I would like to ask
On Wed, 07 May 2003 15:09:50 +0200
Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know about NVidia drivers, but a chvt before suspending (and
> > a chvt back to X upon resume) should do the trick
>
> That's what I thought too, but unfortunately it wasn't (for me) the
> case. You got an at
Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> On Wed, 07 May 2003 14:35:04 +0200
> Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Matìj Hausenblas wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi List,
> > > I have some little trouble finding documentation on putting an
> > > purely ACPI (no APM support) laptop (Acer TravelMate 435LC) to
> >
On Wed, 07 May 2003 14:35:04 +0200
Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matìj Hausenblas wrote:
> >
> > Hi List,
> > I have some little trouble finding documentation on putting an
> > purely ACPI (no APM support) laptop (Acer TravelMate 435LC) to
> > sleep. The apm -s command doesn't work s
Matìj Hausenblas wrote:
>
> Hi List,
> I have some little trouble finding documentation on putting an purely ACPI (no
> APM support) laptop (Acer TravelMate 435LC) to sleep. The apm -s command
> doesn't work since apm isn't enabled.
> I would like to ask if there's an equivalent to that command bu
At 10:32 2003-04-28, =?iso-8859-2?q?Mat=ECj=20Hausenblas?= wrote:
Hi List,
I have some little trouble finding documentation on putting an purely ACPI
(no
APM support) laptop (Acer TravelMate 435LC) to sleep. The apm -s command
doesn't work since apm isn't enabled.
I would like to ask if there's
26 matches
Mail list logo
