Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2019-04-19 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:56:22PM -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote: > Context, it's always important. The offerS have been given by several > people, over several years, across several methods. I know Dave, I have > a reasonable idea of how Dave would have make his first, second, third, > fourth, fift

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-15 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 08:10:19PM -0500, Marvin Renich wrote: > Third, the list masters are professional and expert email > administrators, and they volunteer their time to run the Debian mailing > lists. Characterizing them as idiots is not only extremely rude, but as > far from the truth as you

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-04 Thread Helen McCall
On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:47:26 -0500 Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 14:23 -0700, Lou wrote: > > On 12/4/2018 12:14 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > > > 2. One disadvantages of "zero spam" in a BB/mail-list with world > > > > wide  > > > > members is the high prospect of false positives.

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-04 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 14:23 -0700, Lou wrote: > On 12/4/2018 12:14 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > > 2. One disadvantages of "zero spam" in a BB/mail-list with world > > > wide  > > > members is the high prospect of false positives.  The possibility > > > of  > > > penalizing a contributor based on th

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-04 Thread Lou
On 12/4/2018 12:14 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: 2. One disadvantages of "zero spam" in a BB/mail-list with world wide members is the high prospect of false positives.  The possibility of penalizing a contributor based on their ISP or neighborhood would be counter productive. Can you cite an example

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-04 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 11:28 -0700, Lou wrote: > Two observations: > > 1. By my count, post "about spam" have generated more clutter than > the spam I have observed. Ack. But maybe this time the outcome will be productive. > Spam here are noticeably less than on other BB, email list, forums I >

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-04 Thread Lou
Two observations: 1. By my count, post "about spam" have generated more clutter than the spam I have observed. Spam here are noticeably less than on other BB, email list, forums I monitor/moderate. 2. One disadvantages of "zero spam" in a BB/mail-list with world wide members is the high pros

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-04 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 11:30 -0500, Marvin Renich wrote: > * Jim Popovitch [181203 23:57]: > > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 22:33 -0500, Marvin Renich wrote: > > > Are you saying that because others have, in the past, resorted to > > > violence that it becomes justifiable?   > > > > No, I'm saying lesson

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-04 Thread Marvin Renich
* Jim Popovitch [181203 23:57]: > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 22:33 -0500, Marvin Renich wrote: > > Are you saying that because others have, in the past, resorted to > > violence that it becomes justifiable?   > > No, I'm saying lessons learned from History are to always be respected > and not ignored.

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-04 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 07:53 -0500, Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 23:56:22 -0500 Jim Popovitch > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 22:33 -0500, Marvin Renich wrote: > > > Are you saying that because others have, in the past, resorted to > > > violence that it becomes justifiable?   > > >

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-04 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 23:56:22 -0500 Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 22:33 -0500, Marvin Renich wrote: > > Are you saying that because others have, in the past, resorted to > > violence that it becomes justifiable?   > > No, I'm saying lessons learned from History are to always be res

Thank you (was: Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd))

2018-12-04 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Dear Alex, dear Dave, dear everyone. Alexander Wirt - 04.12.18, 07:47: > On Mon, 03 Dec 2018, Marvin Renich wrote: > > * Jim Popovitch [181203 15:21]: > > > How long should Dave wait out the problem before insulting folks? > > > 1 > > > month, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 25 ye

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-03 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018, Marvin Renich wrote: > * Jim Popovitch [181203 15:21]: > > How long should Dave wait out the problem before insulting folks? 1 > > month, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 25 years? > > The correct answer is "much longer than 25 years". He should at least wait

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-03 Thread Imre Vida
Guys, could you please just stop. The verbal attack was not justified - and can not be justified, even if there are/were some perceived problems. Human history is dominated by unfair aggression, but again: it does not and can not justify any aggression. Much appreciation to Debian and Debian-l

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-03 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 22:33 -0500, Marvin Renich wrote: > Are you saying that because others have, in the past, resorted to > violence that it becomes justifiable?   No, I'm saying lessons learned from History are to always be respected and not ignored. > Over an offer to help that was sent to th

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-03 Thread Marvin Renich
* Jim Popovitch [181203 15:21]: > How long should Dave wait out the problem before insulting folks? 1 > month, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 25 years? The correct answer is "much longer than 25 years". > At > what point should constructive feedback yield to insults, and at what

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-02 Thread eamanu15
Dave, I think first of all, that you must take care the language used here. If you have the knowledge to avoid the spams, maybe you have to work on the solution, talking with DD instead "offer your services". El dom., 2 de dic. de 2018 a la(s) 22:10, Marvin Renich (m...@renich.org) escribió: > *

Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)

2018-12-02 Thread Marvin Renich
* Dave Horsfall [181202 17:58]: > Have you idiots ever thought of implementing some simple anti-spam measures? > I have offered my services (free) many times, but thus far have been > ignored, so I can only assume that you lot are spam-supporters. > > Am I right? As it happens, I am in the middl

Re: Spam 101 on debian-user (was: WTS : Macbook Pro)

2018-08-28 Thread Reco
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:53:48PM +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Are "for sale" ads allowed on this list? No. And replying to spam is generally frowned upon. Please do this list a favor, locate "List-Archive" in the original e-mail and click on that url. Locate "Report as spam" button, and click

Re: -- SPAM -- Re: What is the matter with the "http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/"?

2009-07-21 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2009-07-21 02:59, James Brown wrote: Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 06:20:04PM +0400, James Brown wrote: It will be very interesting if anybody skilled in programming will create an open sourse analogue programm like the skype. There are plenty, like ekiga and such.

Re: Spam on the list

2005-05-23 Thread Anders Ellenshøj Andersen
Please people! Could you remove all spam related content from subject and mail body, when you are discussig spam and are answering the spam email. It messes peoples baysian spam filtering that non spam contains spam phrases. Kind Regards Anders E. Andersen On Monday 23 May 2005 15:29, Willie M

RE: Spam

2005-05-16 Thread NoReplies
You sent an email to a mailbox that is not monitored. Please visit http://centexhomes.com or contact your local division. -Original Message- From: "debian-laptop@lists.debian.org" Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:16 PM To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:Spam

RE:[spam 04.96] Re: Is that your document?

2004-05-28 Thread av . mailadministrator
UWAGA: Wiadomosc wyslana [Thu, 27 May 2004 17:25:22 +0100] nie dotarla do odbiorcy(ow): [EMAIL PROTECTED] poniewaz zawierala niedozwolony zalacznik. Polityka antywirusowa POLKOMTEL S.A. nie dopuszcza stosowania tego typu zalacznikow. Wiadomosc zostala wyslana automatycznie prz

RE:[spam 04.96] Re: Is that your document?

2004-05-28 Thread av . mailadministrator
UWAGA: Wiadomosc wyslana [Thu, 27 May 2004 17:25:22 +0100] nie dotarla do odbiorcy(ow): [EMAIL PROTECTED] poniewaz zawierala niedozwolony zalacznik. Polityka antywirusowa POLKOMTEL S.A. nie dopuszcza stosowania tego typu zalacznikow. Wiadomosc zostala wyslana automatycznie prze