On Tue, 14 May 2002, Frank Scott wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:35:02AM -0400, Kozikowski, Mark wrote:
> > I've got a few libjavaplugin files in j2r1-4, which one is the one I
> > should link? I tried with libjavaplugin_ini.so, but it said it wasn't able
> > to find another library, I think l
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Frank Scott wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:35:02AM -0400, Kozikowski, Mark wrote:
> > I've got a few libjavaplugin files in j2r1-4, which one is the one I
> > should link? I tried with libjavaplugin_ini.so, but it said it wasn't able
> > to find another library, I think
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:35:02AM -0400, Kozikowski, Mark wrote:
> I've got a few libjavaplugin files in j2r1-4, which one is the one I
> should link? I tried with libjavaplugin_ini.so, but it said it wasn't able
> to find another library, I think libjvm or something; do you know which
> one it is
Mike Phillips wrote:
>
> Or simply download the jre.xpi for netscape 6.0 and the do a
> file->open on the file from mozilla, this will install the jre fine.
>
only from root, ime.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mozilla 0.9.9 and Java
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Frank Scott wrote:
> I have finally managed to get Java plugin working on Woody using the Sun
> j2re1.3 or j2re1.4.0 packages.
>
I've done that.
> I downloaded the self-extracting binary from the Sun site and after
>
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:35:02AM -0400, Kozikowski, Mark wrote:
> I've got a few libjavaplugin files in j2r1-4, which one is the one I
> should link? I tried with libjavaplugin_ini.so, but it said it wasn't able
> to find another library, I think libjvm or something; do you know which
> one it i
Mike Phillips wrote:
>
> Or simply download the jre.xpi for netscape 6.0 and the do a
> file->open on the file from mozilla, this will install the jre fine.
>
only from root, ime.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:17:10PM +0100 or sometime in the same epoch, Frank
Scott scribbled:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:21:55PM -0700, Cassandra Lynette Ludwig wrote:
> > I don't know if anyone else is having this same issue, but I am having a
> > problem with Mozilla 0.9.9 in that it does no
Subject: Re: Mozilla 0.9.9 and Java
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Frank Scott wrote:
> I have finally managed to get Java plugin working on Woody using the Sun
> j2re1.3 or j2re1.4.0 packages.
>
I've done that.
> I downloaded the self-extracting binary from the Sun site and after
>
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Frank Scott wrote:
> I have finally managed to get Java plugin working on Woody using the Sun
> j2re1.3 or j2re1.4.0 packages.
>
I've done that.
> I downloaded the self-extracting binary from the Sun site and after
> installing it, set a link to the approriate libjavapluginX
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:17:10PM +0100 or sometime in the same epoch, Frank Scott
scribbled:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:21:55PM -0700, Cassandra Lynette Ludwig wrote:
> > I don't know if anyone else is having this same issue, but I am having a
> > problem with Mozilla 0.9.9 in that it does n
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Frank Scott wrote:
> I have finally managed to get Java plugin working on Woody using the Sun
> j2re1.3 or j2re1.4.0 packages.
>
I've done that.
> I downloaded the self-extracting binary from the Sun site and after
> installing it, set a link to the approriate libjavaplugin
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:21:55PM -0700, Cassandra Lynette Ludwig wrote:
> I don't know if anyone else is having this same issue, but I am having a
> problem with Mozilla 0.9.9 in that it does not seem to accept the Java
> plugin.
>
>
> If anyone has solved this issue, could they let me know h
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:21:55PM -0700, Cassandra Lynette Ludwig wrote:
> I don't know if anyone else is having this same issue, but I am having a
> problem with Mozilla 0.9.9 in that it does not seem to accept the Java
> plugin.
>
>
> If anyone has solved this issue, could they let me know
Here's a copy of a reply to Cassandra, I guess I forgot to CC the
list...
- Forwarded message from Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 23:22:16 -0500
From: Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Cassandra Lynette Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sub
t;
Subject: Re: Mozilla 0.9.9 and Java
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Organization: Amateur Radio!
A year or so back I discovered the X development packages had to be
installed for Mozilla to run the JRE. This was in Potato and I'm not
sure if Woody has the same problem. The reason, I discovered, is t
> I don't know if anyone else is having this same issue, but I am having a
> problem with Mozilla 0.9.9 in that it does not seem to accept the Java
> plugin.
All the Mozillas have had a problem that I've seen. I finally managed to
install the plugin by running Mozilla from root. After downloadin
> I don't know if anyone else is having this same issue, but I am having a
> problem with Mozilla 0.9.9 in that it does not seem to accept the Java
> plugin.
All the Mozillas have had a problem that I've seen. I finally managed to
install the plugin by running Mozilla from root. After downloadi
На 11 май 2002 г. (събота), в 2.21 Cassandra Lynette Ludwig писа:
> I don't know if anyone else is having this same issue, but I am having a
> problem with Mozilla 0.9.9 in that it does not seem to accept the Java
> plugin.
>
> This is a touch annoying as everything I have read documentation-wi
На 11 май 2002 г. (събота), в 2.21 Cassandra Lynette Ludwig писа:
> I don't know if anyone else is having this same issue, but I am having a
> problem with Mozilla 0.9.9 in that it does not seem to accept the Java
> plugin.
>
> This is a touch annoying as everything I have read documentation-w
20 matches
Mail list logo
