Okay, this is drifting way off-topic, but I'll give it one last shot...
Andre Berger wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Andre Berger wrote:
> >
> > But that's the problem- it tries to get the new mail anyway sometimes when
> > I switch
> > folders! I'd just use somethin
Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andre Berger wrote:
>
> But that's the problem- it tries to get the new mail anyway sometimes when I
> switch
> folders! I'd just use something else, but I like Netscape; hopefully Mozilla
> will solve
> my problems. :-)
I don't really understand
Okay, this is drifting way off-topic, but I'll give it one last shot...
Andre Berger wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Andre Berger wrote:
> >
> > But that's the problem- it tries to get the new mail anyway sometimes when I switch
> > folders! I'd just use something el
Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andre Berger wrote:
>
> But that's the problem- it tries to get the new mail anyway sometimes when I switch
> folders! I'd just use something else, but I like Netscape; hopefully Mozilla will
>solve
> my problems. :-)
I don't really understand wh
Andre Berger wrote:
> The recent fetchmail gets unseen msgs only, unless you specify -a
> (all msgs, seen or not).
Cool.
> Note that I said (or meant) in my original posting I have turned off
> automatic retrieval in Netscape. If you combine Netscape and Xbiff or
> anything else that tells you n
Andre Berger wrote:
> The recent fetchmail gets unseen msgs only, unless you specify -a
> (all msgs, seen or not).
Cool.
> Note that I said (or meant) in my original posting I have turned off
> automatic retrieval in Netscape. If you combine Netscape and Xbiff or
> anything else that tells you
Adam, the thing I described works flawlessly here. Personally I don't
use Netscape (I use GNUs) but my family does. I wanted a possibility
to check all (every user's) mail at once and automatically when our
common machine goes online, and it works.
The recent fetchmail gets unseen msgs only, unle
Adam, the thing I described works flawlessly here. Personally I don't
use Netscape (I use GNUs) but my family does. I wanted a possibility
to check all (every user's) mail at once and automatically when our
common machine goes online, and it works.
The recent fetchmail gets unseen msgs only, unl
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 05:23:28PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > I think folks used to assume anything running UNIX was full-time
> > networked. Just ain't so anymore.
>
> It's partly that, but it's also because the application isn't really the
> right place to fix things like this. It's simple
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 05:23:28PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > I think folks used to assume anything running UNIX was full-time
> > networked. Just ain't so anymore.
>
> It's partly that, but it's also because the application isn't really the
> right place to fix things like this. It's simpl
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 11:47:47AM -0400, Cory Snavely wrote:
> I think folks used to assume anything running UNIX was full-time
> networked. Just ain't so anymore.
It's partly that, but it's also because the application isn't really the
right place to fix things like this. It's simpler to have
Andre Berger wrote:
> Cory Snavely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is the *exact* same problem I have. One possible solution I've been
> > kicking around is to set up a low-end server at home with imapd and
> > Apache with mod_roaming (for the address books, etc.)
> >
> > That's a lot of wo
Wow, yeah, that would work. Good job!
I wanted to avoid building the whole thing myself, you see.
In the Windows 98 build you actually do a File->Offline->something or
other that lets you read (and browse) in an offline mode. It uses the
IMAP cache and the browser cache to do this. Probably it's
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 11:47:47AM -0400, Cory Snavely wrote:
> I think folks used to assume anything running UNIX was full-time
> networked. Just ain't so anymore.
It's partly that, but it's also because the application isn't really the
right place to fix things like this. It's simpler to have
Andre Berger wrote:
> Cory Snavely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is the *exact* same problem I have. One possible solution I've been
> > kicking around is to set up a low-end server at home with imapd and
> > Apache with mod_roaming (for the address books, etc.)
> >
> > That's a lot of w
Wow, yeah, that would work. Good job!
I wanted to avoid building the whole thing myself, you see.
In the Windows 98 build you actually do a File->Offline->something or
other that lets you read (and browse) in an offline mode. It uses the
IMAP cache and the browser cache to do this. Probably it's
Cory Snavely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is the *exact* same problem I have. One possible solution I've been
> kicking around is to set up a low-end server at home with imapd and
> Apache with mod_roaming (for the address books, etc.)
>
> That's a lot of work. To confess, though, I thought
Cory Snavely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is the *exact* same problem I have. One possible solution I've been
> kicking around is to set up a low-end server at home with imapd and
> Apache with mod_roaming (for the address books, etc.)
>
> That's a lot of work. To confess, though, I though
Christopher Hicks wrote:
> One improvement I would very much like to make over the setup I had before
> is this: it would be *very* convenient to store my email on a partition
> accessible to both Linux and Win98 (which I have to have for work - sigh)
I dual boot Windows 95 and GNU/Linux 2.2.14 (
Christopher Hicks wrote:
> One improvement I would very much like to make over the setup I had before
> is this: it would be *very* convenient to store my email on a partition
> accessible to both Linux and Win98 (which I have to have for work - sigh)
I dual boot Windows 95 and GNU/Linux 2.2.14
This is the *exact* same problem I have. One possible solution I've been
kicking around is to set up a low-end server at home with imapd and
Apache with mod_roaming (for the address books, etc.)
That's a lot of work. To confess, though, I thought it might be fun 8)
and good practice.
My biggest c
This is the *exact* same problem I have. One possible solution I've been
kicking around is to set up a low-end server at home with imapd and
Apache with mod_roaming (for the address books, etc.)
That's a lot of work. To confess, though, I thought it might be fun 8)
and good practice.
My biggest
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Christopher Hicks wrote:
> One improvement I would very much like to make over the setup I had before
> is this: it would be *very* convenient to store my email on a partition
> accessible to both Linux and Win98 (which I have to have for work - sigh)
> such that I can access
"Christopher Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[email clients on both Windows 98 and Linux]
> Mahogany looks promising, but I've heard it is still excessively buggy. Does
> anyone have any other suggestions?
Any of the Emacs based mail programs ought to work. Or exmh (and
presumably tkrat).
-
Hi All,
Having just got my laptop back from repair (g) I am ready to
reinstall operating systems and recover everything from my backups etc etc.
I'll also take the opportunity to upgrade from slink to potato.
One improvement I would very much like to make over the setup I had before
is th
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Christopher Hicks wrote:
> One improvement I would very much like to make over the setup I had before
> is this: it would be *very* convenient to store my email on a partition
> accessible to both Linux and Win98 (which I have to have for work - sigh)
> such that I can acces
"Christopher Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[email clients on both Windows 98 and Linux]
> Mahogany looks promising, but I've heard it is still excessively buggy. Does
> anyone have any other suggestions?
Any of the Emacs based mail programs ought to work. Or exmh (and
presumably tkrat).
Hi All,
Having just got my laptop back from repair (g) I am ready to
reinstall operating systems and recover everything from my backups etc etc.
I'll also take the opportunity to upgrade from slink to potato.
One improvement I would very much like to make over the setup I had before
is t
28 matches
Mail list logo
