Re: Lightweight browsers (Re: Unidentified subject!)

2002-02-01 Thread Pasi Savolainen
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:30:44PM +0200, Pasi Savolainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Tim van Erven wrote: >>>>> Mozilla/Netscape 6.2 on new machines is neither slow nor buggy. >>>>> Just try it in my Pentium 100, 32MB RAM. >>>

Re: Lightweight browsers (Re: Unidentified subject!)

2002-02-01 Thread Pasi Savolainen
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:30:44PM +0200, Pasi Savolainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Tim van Erven wrote: >>>>> Mozilla/Netscape 6.2 on new machines is neither slow nor buggy. >>>>> Just try it in my Pentium 100, 32MB RAM. >>>

Re: AMD's PowerNow?

2002-01-29 Thread Pasi Savolainen
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Alan Shutko wrote: > Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have a real problem buying into that explanation. > > http://lists.insecure.org/linux-kernel/2001/Jul/0039.html > > > Why would Intel create Speed-step cpus and then not let you know how > > to use it?

Re: AMD's PowerNow?

2002-01-29 Thread Pasi Savolainen
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Alan Shutko wrote: > Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have a real problem buying into that explanation. > > http://lists.insecure.org/linux-kernel/2001/Jul/0039.html > > > Why would Intel create Speed-step cpus and then not let you know how > > to use it?