On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Michael wrote:
>
> > That looks like someone is attempting to eavesdrop on you.
>
> I would be interested in how that could work and how to defend against
> it. Would you mind to try to explain it, for short ... ?
I'm not an expert, but let me put it this way: what would be th
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Sebastian Salvino wrote:
>
> if you are using a router, reconfigure it to override the name servers
> assigned by your isp and use opendns, goggle public dns out any other of
> your choice.
>
> if you not using any router, setup your laptop to use the above fixed name
> servers
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Frank Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 12.05.2010 19:18, schrieb Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn:
>
> > Can you access that router from your wife's box (Ubuntu 8.10 with
> > network manager) and have a look at the dhcp logs? Something (client
> > maybe) may
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Frank Zimmermann wrote:
> The router is a Speedport W 303V
Can you access that router from your wife's box (Ubuntu 8.10 with network
manager) and have a look at the dhcp logs? Something (client maybe) may
be eating up all available ip-addresses. Or there's a buggy dhcp-serv
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, twfb wrote:
> Greetings list,
>
> My thinkpad x60 1706-BS8 overheats while compiling/rendering if
> /proc/acpi/ibm/fan is set to "auto".
>
> I have been running Lenny for quite some time and it used to be fine.
> The problems started sometime this autumn, perhaps around the ker
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, Bernard wrote:
> At last, I know why WPA connexion trials never succeeded on my laptop.
> Indeed, I have been able to figure what was the firmware STA version of
> my prism2 card, it shows with 'dmesg':
>
> wifi0 STA id 0x1f v1.4.9
>
> while the author of the Hostap software sa
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Alvin Smith wrote:
> On Thursday 27 January 2005 09:44 am, Juraj Ziegler wrote:
> >
> > A wild guess would be your pcmcia card going into a power-saving mode.
>
> If so, then how, or where, do I tell it to either wake up,
# cardctl resume
> or not to do that?
# cardctl
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Miky J wrote:
> I just want to tell the system to ignore eth1 as a
> hotplug.
Add to /etc/default/hotplug:
HOTPLUG_RC_net=no
(see function run_rcs in /etc/init.d/hotplug)
Cheers,
Cristian
--
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Miky J wrote:
> I just want to tell the system to ignore eth1 as a
> hotplug.
Add to /etc/default/hotplug:
HOTPLUG_RC_net=no
(see function run_rcs in /etc/init.d/hotplug)
Cheers,
Cristian
--
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Derek Broughton wrote:
> From: "Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> >
> > > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now,
> > > I've been runn
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn said on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:42:53PM +0200:
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> >
> > > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> > > been running the
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Derek Broughton wrote:
> From: "Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> >
> > > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now,
> > > I've been runn
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn said on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:42:53PM +0200:
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> >
> > > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> > > been running the
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change what
> modules I load, with this new kernel package have come a whole bunch of
> new modules that are being loaded. I've run modconf
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change what
> modules I load, with this new kernel package have come a whole bunch of
> new modules that are being loaded. I've run modconf
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> this mail is sent using the Belkin card
;-)
> i did a manual ifconfig eth1 ipadress
> and voila! it works
> it appears that my eth1 interface is not getting assigned an ip number for
> some reason...once i fihure oyt why i think I'm home free.
At a closer lo
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> snip---
> > Warning: Driver for device eth1 has been compiled with version 13
> > of Wireless Extension, while this program is using version 16.
> > Some things may be broken...
> >
> snip ---
>
> Yes i get that message.
Altho, that _should not_ give you
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> this mail is sent using the Belkin card
;-)
> i did a manual ifconfig eth1 ipadress
> and voila! it works
> it appears that my eth1 interface is not getting assigned an ip number for
> some reason...once i fihure oyt why i think I'm home free.
At a closer lo
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> No changes if i remove the wep part in interfaces..
Bummer :(
> on the other hand wep isnt starting automatically, i have to do it by
> hand, if i do iwconfig eth1 essid something
Do you have something similart to this high ut in your /etc/pcmcia/config?
If
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> snip---
> > Warning: Driver for device eth1 has been compiled with version 13
> > of Wireless Extension, while this program is using version 16.
> > Some things may be broken...
> >
> snip ---
>
> Yes i get that message.
Altho, that _should not_ give you
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> Anyway my card is initializing as it should however i'm having problems
> getting settings to take. i can set the wep encryption key but i cant set
> the essid using iwconfig...
Odd. It would not have surprised me if it were the other way arround (as
wep is kn
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> No changes if i remove the wep part in interfaces..
Bummer :(
> on the other hand wep isnt starting automatically, i have to do it by
> hand, if i do iwconfig eth1 essid something
Do you have something similart to this high ut in your /etc/pcmcia/config?
If
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> Anyway my card is initializing as it should however i'm having problems
> getting settings to take. i can set the wep encryption key but i cant set
> the essid using iwconfig...
Odd. It would not have surprised me if it were the other way arround (as
wep is kn
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> >
> > > The only difference after making your changes was that ifup now
> > > generates the following
> > >
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> >
> > > The only difference after making your changes was that ifup now
> > > generates the following
> > >
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> The only difference after making your changes was that ifup now generates
> the following
>
> "Ignoring unknown interface eth1=eth1"
:( Maybe it's not eth1.
Take a look at the result from:
# dmesg
It should show something similar to this:
,
| Install
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> # The loopback interface
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> # The first network card - this entry was created during the Debian
> installation
> # (network, broadcast and gateway are optional)
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.4.
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> The only difference after making your changes was that ifup now generates
> the following
>
> "Ignoring unknown interface eth1=eth1"
:( Maybe it's not eth1.
Take a look at the result from:
# dmesg
It should show something similar to this:
,
| Install
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Thomas wrote:
> # The loopback interface
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> # The first network card - this entry was created during the Debian installation
> # (network, broadcast and gateway are optional)
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.4.1
>
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> I subsequently modprobe:ed usb-ohci, and all this bunch came back:
>
> mousedev3736 0 (unused)
> hid17892 0 (unused)
> usbmouse1784 0 (unused)
> input
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
> Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, ben wrote:
> >
>
> > For comparison, this is what I have om my acer:
> >
> > Module Size Used byNot tainted
> > mou
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> I subsequently modprobe:ed usb-ohci, and all this bunch came back:
>
> mousedev3736 0 (unused)
> hid17892 0 (unused)
> usbmouse1784 0 (unused)
> input
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
> Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, ben wrote:
> >
>
> > For comparison, this is what I have om my acer:
> >
> > Module Size Used byNot tainted
> > mou
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, ben wrote:
> things are getting messy here.
To say the least ;-)
> I have reposted this to try and clear things up a little.
Can you post the output from:
# lspci -v
too?
> I do not have usb-ohci installed. I am running an Asus laptop with Intel
> chipset and using usb
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, ben wrote:
> things are getting messy here.
To say the least ;-)
> I have reposted this to try and clear things up a little.
Can you post the output from:
# lspci -v
too?
> I do not have usb-ohci installed. I am running an Asus laptop with Intel
> chipset and using usb
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Ben wrote:
> have mousedev installed, usbmouse seems to be sticking in my modules as
> have done several kernel recompiles and although it appears to have
> vanished from modconf. if i do lsmod it appears but is unused.
These are the relevant modules (wrt. the usb mouse) lsmod
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Ben wrote:
> have mousedev installed, usbmouse seems to be sticking in my modules as
> have done several kernel recompiles and although it appears to have
> vanished from modconf. if i do lsmod it appears but is unused.
These are the relevant modules (wrt. the usb mouse) lsmod
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ...kernel 2.4.19 and oricoco_cs driver.
> >
> > Anyone able to confirm this _should_ be possible?
>
> I'm using same card. Works just fine with late
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ...kernel 2.4.19 and oricoco_cs driver.
> >
> > Anyone able to confirm this _should_ be possible?
>
> I'm using same card. Works just fine with late
...kernel 2.4.19 and oricoco_cs driver.
Anyone able to confirm this _should_ be possible?
Cheers,
Cristian
...kernel 2.4.19 and oricoco_cs driver.
Anyone able to confirm this _should_ be possible?
Cheers,
Cristian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Derek Broughton wrote:
> From: "Frédéric Bothamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Except that since it is under /usr, it might not be available at fsck
> > time (that is, before /usr is mounted in /etc/rcS.d/S30checkfs.sh).
>
> Doh! Of course you're right. I wonder if it could be c
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Derek Broughton wrote:
> From: "Frédéric Bothamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Except that since it is under /usr, it might not be available at fsck
> > time (that is, before /usr is mounted in /etc/rcS.d/S30checkfs.sh).
>
> Doh! Of course you're right. I wonder if it could be c
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Craig H. Anderson wrote:
> Craig H. Anderson writes:
>
> > I am having trouble getting an IBM EtherJet network card
> > to auto start at boot. I am running the kernel-image package
> > for 2.4.20-3-686.
> >
> > The file /etc/default/pcmcia was modified
> > PCIC=i82365
> > c
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Craig H. Anderson wrote:
> Craig H. Anderson writes:
>
> > I am having trouble getting an IBM EtherJet network card
> > to auto start at boot. I am running the kernel-image package
> > for 2.4.20-3-686.
> >
> > The file /etc/default/pcmcia was modified
> > PCIC=i82365
> > c
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Giuseppe Ciotta wrote:
> Ivar Alm writes:
>
> > At 17:54 2003-01-27, Giuseppe Ciotta wrote:
> >> hi! i have an acer 630 laptop, using it, sometimes (today happened 4
> >> times) the mouse cursor do weird movements on the screen and the keyboard
> >> is unusable, the only solut
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Giuseppe Ciotta wrote:
> Ivar Alm writes:
>
> > At 17:54 2003-01-27, Giuseppe Ciotta wrote:
> >> hi! i have an acer 630 laptop, using it, sometimes (today happened 4
> >> times) the mouse cursor do weird movements on the screen and the keyboard
> >> is unusable, the only solut
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Matthieu Lagouge wrote:
> * First, the soundcard is not what i think! How couldl i be sure?
> lspci give me the following information about it:
> 00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. AC97 Audio
> Controller (rev 30)
> so what??
# cd /usr/share/misc
# mv
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Matthieu Lagouge wrote:
> * First, the soundcard is not what i think! How couldl i be sure?
> lspci give me the following information about it:
> 00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. AC97 Audio
> Controller (rev 30)
> so what??
# cd /usr/share/misc
# mv
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, MaxieZeus wrote:
> 2) when starting a windowmanger from xdm, how can I autostart
> programs? basically how can I make xdm use .xinitrc?
I use ~/.xsession but no xdm.
> 3) how can I set the mixer non graphically? I was using OSS on SuSE
cam and rexima.
Cheers,
Cristian
-
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, MaxieZeus wrote:
> 2) when starting a windowmanger from xdm, how can I autostart
> programs? basically how can I make xdm use .xinitrc?
I use ~/.xsession but no xdm.
> 3) how can I set the mixer non graphically? I was using OSS on SuSE
cam and rexima.
Cheers,
Cristian
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Pat Mahoney wrote:
> My friend has a compaq presario 1700 with a bultin ehternet card on the pci
> bus. It may or may not be combined with a modem on the same card. We
> cannot get the network card to work (potato install, kernel 2.2.17).
>
> Looking around at the kharker l
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Pat Mahoney wrote:
> My friend has a compaq presario 1700 with a bultin ehternet card on the pci
> bus. It may or may not be combined with a modem on the same card. We
> cannot get the network card to work (potato install, kernel 2.2.17).
>
> Looking around at the kharker
53 matches
Mail list logo
