Re: x configuration

2002-08-02 Thread Brian May
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:37:08PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 14:31, Ditch, Derek P., MO-ARNG wrote: > > Using X version 3.x for that card is gonna be a pain. I'd suggest > > using 4.1 and get the custom Savage chip from here > > (http://www.probo.com/timr/savagemx.html)

Re: The screen is not centered on my laptop

2002-08-02 Thread Michele
At 12.52 01/08/2002 -0400, you wrote: > > Michele It sounds like it's using a framebuffer display, and not doing it gracefully. The framebuffer for some video cards is just not that mature yet, unfortunately, so if you don't need it, you can disable it and get a nice text display. If you do ne

Re: The screen is not centered on my laptop

2002-08-02 Thread Michele
At 09.52 01/08/2002 -0500, you wrote: try using vga=788 as a boot parameter Sorry im *very* new in the linux world, where do i put the boot parameter? Michele

Re: Blurry screen with X 4.2.0

2002-08-02 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Erich Schubert wrote: >> read-edid doesn't always work on LCD screens, unfortunately, since >> the mfr doesn't handle it on the LCD. My thinkpad doesn't, for >> instance. > > You're right, it doesn't work on my notebook either. > It worked fine on my old pc, though. > > It's a

Re: Blurry screen with X 4.2.0

2002-08-02 Thread Erich Schubert
> read-edid doesn't always work on LCD screens, unfortunately, since the > mfr doesn't handle it on the LCD. My thinkpad doesn't, for instance. You're right, it doesn't work on my notebook either. It worked fine on my old pc, though. It's a shame that it doesn't work on new LCDs... Greetings, E

Re: Blurry screen with X 4.2.0

2002-08-02 Thread Alan Shutko
Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > May i suggest installing the "suggested" software packages for > xserver-xfree86 (that is, run "apt-get install discover mdetect > read-edid") read-edid doesn't always work on LCD screens, unfortunately, since the mfr doesn't handle it on the LCD. My

Re: Blurry screen with X 4.2.0

2002-08-02 Thread Erich Schubert
May i suggest installing the "suggested" software packages for xserver-xfree86 (that is, run "apt-get install discover mdetect read-edid") which are for graphics board detection, mouse detection, monitor detection - then run "dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86" which hopefully will select the correct

Re: Blurry screen with X 4.2.0

2002-08-02 Thread Alan Shutko
Tiarnan O Corrain writes: > Thank you for replying, but I don't think this is what I'm looking > for. The problem seems to be to be a rendering one. Text quality is > far lower with the ATI driver than with VESA. Right, but with VESA you had a black border around the screen. That means that yo

Re: Blurry screen with X 4.2.0

2002-08-02 Thread Erich Schubert
> Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M6 LY). The border problem is gone > (ie it uses the whole of the screen), but the display is very > blurry. I tried setting up sub-pixel sampling (in XftConfig), but > couldn't notice any difference. You use the wrong resolution for your display. You should use

Re: Blurry screen with X 4.2.0

2002-08-02 Thread Tiarnan O Corrain
Mike Alborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > This sounds like the same problem that's been cropping up with other > laptop users lately. > A laptop LCD, unlike a conventional CRT (desktop) display, is basically > a > fixed resolution device. For example, my laptop's 14.1" display h

Re: Blurry screen with X 4.2.0

2002-08-02 Thread Mike Alborn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, This sounds like the same problem that's been cropping up with other laptop users lately. A laptop LCD, unlike a conventional CRT (desktop) display, is basically a fixed resolution device. For example, my laptop's 14.1" display ha

Blurry screen with X 4.2.0

2002-08-02 Thread Tiarnan O Corrain
Hi all-- I just set my laptop up with sid and unofficial X 4.2.0 debs. The computer is a HP Omnibook 6100 with a 15-inch screen. I tried the VESA driver first, and it acted as if it was on a 14-inch screen. Perfectly visible and crisp display, just an annoying black border of dark pixels. So I up

Re: Monitoring disk access

2002-08-02 Thread Walter Hofmann
On Fri, 02 Aug 2002, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 02 août 2002, vers > 14:07, Walter Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > > > - Change /etc/cron.d/exim to prevent exim from running the queue every > > 15 minutes (mind the consequences!) > > I us

Re: SVGA XServer vs framebuffer + X_FBDEV

2002-08-02 Thread Alexei Khlebnikov
> > I want to run linux on not-very-fast machine (Pentium-1 class, not-so-much > > memory). > > What configuration requires more resourses (mostly RAM, also CPU), > > X_SVGA (or similar) server or framebuffer + X_FBDEV server ? > > What configuration is lighter, faster? > > I am interested mostly i

Re: Monitoring disk access

2002-08-02 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du vendredi 02 août 2002, vers 09:39, Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > I am trying to spot the application which are regularly using the disk, > waking it up from sleep and eating unnecessary my battery. Is there > some program which could log (on a tmp

Re: SVGA XServer vs framebuffer + X_FBDEV

2002-08-02 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 15:51, Alexei Khlebnikov wrote: > I want to run linux on not-very-fast machine (Pentium-1 class, not-so-much > memory). > What configuration requires more resourses (mostly RAM, also CPU), > X_SVGA (or similar) server or framebuffer + X_FBDEV server ? > What configuration is ligh

SVGA XServer vs framebuffer + X_FBDEV

2002-08-02 Thread Alexei Khlebnikov
I want to run linux on not-very-fast machine (Pentium-1 class, not-so-much memory). What configuration requires more resourses (mostly RAM, also CPU), X_SVGA (or similar) server or framebuffer + X_FBDEV server ? What configuration is lighter, faster? I am interested mostly in 3.3.6 version, info a

Re: x configuration

2002-08-02 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 14:31, Ditch, Derek P., MO-ARNG wrote: > Using X version 3.x for that card is gonna be a pain. I'd suggest > using 4.1 and get the custom Savage chip from here > (http://www.probo.com/timr/savagemx.html). They have a version for 3.x and > 4.x If you use the 4.x version

RE: x configuration

2002-08-02 Thread Ditch, Derek P., MO-ARNG
Damon, Using X version 3.x for that card is gonna be a pain. I'd suggest using 4.1 and get the custom Savage chip from here (http://www.probo.com/timr/savagemx.html). They have a version for 3.x and 4.x If you use the 4.x version from xfree86 then you'll get problems with system locking

Re: Monitoring disk access

2002-08-02 Thread Alexei Khlebnikov
> > Moreover, the Battery Powered Linux HOWTO is quite old, is there some > > other documents about all this. For example, how to instruct Linux to > > keep the data in cache longer ? There is Linux-Laptop HOWTO. It recommends using "noflushd" instead of "updated".

Re: Monitoring disk access

2002-08-02 Thread kiss the sun and walk on air
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 09:39:21AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > I am trying to spot the application which are regularly using the disk, > waking it up from sleep and eating unnecessary my battery. Is there > some program which could log (on a tmpfs of course ! ;-) ) any disk > access with timesta

Re: Monitoring disk access

2002-08-02 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 02 août 2002, vers 14:07, Walter Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > - Change /etc/cron.d/exim to prevent exim from running the queue every > 15 minutes (mind the consequences!) I use postfix, is there a similar trick for it ? Thanks for y

Re: Monitoring disk access

2002-08-02 Thread Walter Hofmann
On Fri, 02 Aug 2002, Vincent Bernat wrote: > I am trying to spot the application which are regularly using the disk, > waking it up from sleep and eating unnecessary my battery. Is there > some program which could log (on a tmpfs of course ! ;-) ) any disk > access with timestamp, file (well if it

Re: x configuration

2002-08-02 Thread fbothamy
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 07:59:02PM -0700, damon fasching wrote: > Hi, > > I've just installed debian on a Presario 721CL. The [...] > I chose advance package selection and then grabbed > only xfree-86common, xdm and fvwm (above and beyond > whatever is preselected). I also selected some of th

Re: Monitoring disk access

2002-08-02 Thread negon
Hi it could be that you are using a journalling filesystem like ext3 or reiserfs, 'cause those are writting to disk every 5 sec or so... I haven't found out how to make it write to disk a little less often, but if anybody know how, I would like to hear about it!! -->negon Citat Vincent Bernat <

Monitoring disk access

2002-08-02 Thread Vincent Bernat
Hello ! I am trying to spot the application which are regularly using the disk, waking it up from sleep and eating unnecessary my battery. Is there some program which could log (on a tmpfs of course ! ;-) ) any disk access with timestamp, file (well if it doesn't work at filesystem level, that doe