Laszlo Ladanyi wrote:
> I don't think this is exactly correct. The
> include port 0xa00-0xaff
> line only means that the pcmcia driver can use that address for IO port
> purposes. The comment above that line means that no other card but the IBM
> tokenring card is known to request anything in t
I don't think this is exactly correct. The
include port 0xa00-0xaff
line only means that the pcmcia driver can use that address for IO port
purposes. The comment above that line means that no other card but the IBM
tokenring card is known to request anything in that memory range.
On the other
LinuxKnight wrote:
> The networking works fine, but I can't get the modem to work. I know it
> does work, because a while ago, I had both network and modem working in
> RedHat 6.1. Then I upgraded to 6.2 shortly after it came out, and the
> modem stopped working- network still worked.
> If a
I made a very similar request a few weeks ago, except I wanted a
10/100Mb + 56k card. The result was quite a few recommendations for
the Linksys EtherFast PCMCIA card. I've had the card for a couple of
weeks and it's worked flawlessly under Debian and WinNT. Under potato
I just plugged it in an
Laszlo Ladanyi wrote:
> I don't think this is exactly correct. The
> include port 0xa00-0xaff
> line only means that the pcmcia driver can use that address for IO port
> purposes. The comment above that line means that no other card but the IBM
> tokenring card is known to request anything in
I don't think this is exactly correct. The
include port 0xa00-0xaff
line only means that the pcmcia driver can use that address for IO port
purposes. The comment above that line means that no other card but the IBM
tokenring card is known to request anything in that memory range.
On the othe
LinuxKnight wrote:
> The networking works fine, but I can't get the modem to work. I know it
> does work, because a while ago, I had both network and modem working in
> RedHat 6.1. Then I upgraded to 6.2 shortly after it came out, and the
> modem stopped working- network still worked.
> If
>
>I made a very similar request a few weeks ago, except I wanted a
>10/100Mb + 56k card. The result was quite a few recommendations for
>the Linksys EtherFast PCMCIA card. I've had the card for a couple of
>weeks and it's worked flawlessly under Debian and WinNT. Under potato
>I just plugged it
> I sort of assumed on a laptop list that you would expect it to be an lcd.
Oops... missed hat one. Too many debian newsgroups in one folder :-/
> and yes, I think suddenly, as in I noticed it once it was there.
OK.
> Until I bring up the X-window manager - i.e. at the just booted stage, the
>
> I sort of assumed on a laptop list that you would expect it to be an lcd.
Oops... missed hat one. Too many debian newsgroups in one folder :-/
> and yes, I think suddenly, as in I noticed it once it was there.
OK.
> Until I bring up the X-window manager - i.e. at the just booted stage, the
>
Nils Kassube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joerg Braukhoff wrote:
>
> > I met some Lucent people a few weeks ago, when they were running a
> > presentation about UMTS at the company I work for right now and
> > asked them why there is no real support and the company's future
> > plans for linux, b
> Any recommendations for a combined 56k modem/
>10 Mbit/s Ethernet PC Card with decent driver support for Linux?
Try the Linksys 56K+10/100 card, I'm using it right now and I am a big fan. Try
www.fiendishgeek.com/reviews/linksys.html for a review.
An ancient chinese proverb say
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Nils Kassube wrote:
> Joerg Braukhoff wrote:
>
> > I met some Lucent people a few weeks ago, when they were running a
> > presentation
> > about UMTS at the company I work for right now and asked them why there is
> > no
> > real support and the company's future plans for li
Joerg Braukhoff wrote:
> I met some Lucent people a few weeks ago, when they were running a
> presentation
> about UMTS at the company I work for right now and asked them why there is no
> real support and the company's future plans for linux, but nobody could give
> me an answer.
No answer is
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 09:51:40AM +0200, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > and the lucent doesn't support the end user. now you will ask: then how
> > came the ltmodem.o module out? as you know this module is designed for
> > redhat 6.2 so redhat asked for support lucent for it's modem and
Nils Kassube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joerg Braukhoff wrote:
>
> > I met some Lucent people a few weeks ago, when they were running a
> > presentation about UMTS at the company I work for right now and
> > asked them why there is no real support and the company's future
> > plans for linux,
> Any recommendations for a combined 56k modem/
>10 Mbit/s Ethernet PC Card with decent driver support for Linux?
Try the Linksys 56K+10/100 card, I'm using it right now and I am a big fan. Try
www.fiendishgeek.com/reviews/linksys.html for a review.
An ancient chinese proverb sa
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Nils Kassube wrote:
> Joerg Braukhoff wrote:
>
> > I met some Lucent people a few weeks ago, when they were running a presentation
> > about UMTS at the company I work for right now and asked them why there is no
> > real support and the company's future plans for linux, but
Joerg Braukhoff wrote:
> I met some Lucent people a few weeks ago, when they were running a presentation
> about UMTS at the company I work for right now and asked them why there is no
> real support and the company's future plans for linux, but nobody could give
> me an answer.
No answer is an
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 09:51:40AM +0200, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > and the lucent doesn't support the end user. now you will ask: then how
> > came the ltmodem.o module out? as you know this module is designed for
> > redhat 6.2 so redhat asked for support lucent for it's modem and
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 09:51:40AM +0200, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > and the lucent doesn't support the end user. now you will ask: then how
> > came the ltmodem.o module out? as you know this module is designed for
> > redhat 6.2 so redhat asked for support lucent for it's modem an
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 09:51:40AM +0200, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > and the lucent doesn't support the end user. now you will ask: then how
> > came the ltmodem.o module out? as you know this module is designed for
> > redhat 6.2 so redhat asked for support lucent for it's modem an
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Patrick K Notz wrote:
> As an alternative, you might consider using the kernel 2.4.0-test8
> kernel. The pcmcia-cs packages have been merged into the mainline
> kernel source which means you can compile all of the pcmcia code
> directly into your kernel. Since my machine is
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Patrick K Notz wrote:
> As an alternative, you might consider using the kernel 2.4.0-test8
> kernel. The pcmcia-cs packages have been merged into the mainline
> kernel source which means you can compile all of the pcmcia code
> directly into your kernel. Since my machine i
Hello,
> and the lucent doesn't support the end user. now you will ask: then how
> came the ltmodem.o module out? as you know this module is designed for
> redhat 6.2 so redhat asked for support lucent for it's modem and also
> redhat payed for it (as far as i read the mail from the developer on
Dear Sir,
I have a toshiba laptop. (Satellite 4020 cdt). I have
to buy a ethernet card for this for the dsl line
connection. Coould you please tell me if there is a
particular configuration i must look for (only for
laptops), and as to where i can buy and one. Can i
install it myself ?
Thanking Y
Sorry Kero,
I sort of assumed on a laptop list that you would expect it to be an lcd.
and yes, I think suddenly, as in I noticed it once it was there.
Until I bring up the X-window manager - i.e. at the just booted stage, the
screen is black with whitish words on it.
I was unable to find anything w
Hello,
> and the lucent doesn't support the end user. now you will ask: then how
> came the ltmodem.o module out? as you know this module is designed for
> redhat 6.2 so redhat asked for support lucent for it's modem and also
> redhat payed for it (as far as i read the mail from the developer on
28 matches
Mail list logo
