Subject says it all, what must we do to get irda-utils in potato? Does it need
sponsorship while the creator waits to be a maintainer, or does it just need to
be uploaded?
Subject says it all, what must we do to get irda-utils in potato? Does it need
sponsorship while the creator waits to be a maintainer, or does it just need to
be uploaded?
On 14-Sep-99 Clint A. Brubakken wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
>> Point apt at www.debian.org/~joeyh/stable-update -- this is slinkv2.
>>
> Unfortunately that doesn't seem to work, Packages.gz file want all
> packages to be in dists/proposed-updates/ but that director
On 14-Sep-99 Clint A. Brubakken wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
>> Point apt at www.debian.org/~joeyh/stable-update -- this is slinkv2.
>>
> Unfortunately that doesn't seem to work, Packages.gz file want all
> packages to be in dists/proposed-updates/ but that director
On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Point apt at www.debian.org/~joeyh/stable-update -- this is slinkv2.
>
Unfortunately that doesn't seem to work, Packages.gz file want all
packages to be in dists/proposed-updates/ but that directory doesn't
exist. I can d/l each seperatly, but th
On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Point apt at www.debian.org/~joeyh/stable-update -- this is slinkv2.
>
Unfortunately that doesn't seem to work, Packages.gz file want all
packages to be in dists/proposed-updates/ but that directory doesn't
exist. I can d/l each seperatly, but th
On 14-Sep-99 NatePuri wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:02:52AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> I am packaging divine, should appear in the next week - I have to get libnet
>> happy and packaged first.
>
> What is divine?
>
http://www.fefe.de/divine/
>> the hardware detection is much la
On 14-Sep-99 NatePuri wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:02:52AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> I am packaging divine, should appear in the next week - I have to get libnet
>> happy and packaged first.
>
> What is divine?
>
http://www.fefe.de/divine/
>> the hardware detection is much la
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:02:52AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> I am packaging divine, should appear in the next week - I have to get libnet
> happy and packaged first.
What is divine?
> the hardware detection is much larger than laptops and is being looked into
> slowly
I'm very interest
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:02:52AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> I am packaging divine, should appear in the next week - I have to get libnet
> happy and packaged first.
What is divine?
> the hardware detection is much larger than laptops and is being looked into
> slowly
I'm very interest
Why framebuffer?
pentium ops are actually minimal compared to the -O2 output from egcc, plus the
code is larger
does irda need an "official" debian maintainer -- I can find one.
the xserver in potato works with all supported Neomagic chips, a separate
neomagic server is no longer needed
I am pa
Why framebuffer?
pentium ops are actually minimal compared to the -O2 output from egcc, plus the
code is larger
does irda need an "official" debian maintainer -- I can find one.
the xserver in potato works with all supported Neomagic chips, a separate
neomagic server is no longer needed
I am pa
At 13:41 13/09/99 -0500, Clint A. Brubakken wrote:
>I saw that X supports this but the version that comes with 2.1 doesn't.
>I need to things. First how to just upgrade X. (I don't want to go over to
>potato if I can avoid it), or how to replace it with a new version I
>compile my self.
I have a 2
At 13:41 13/09/99 -0500, Clint A. Brubakken wrote:
>I saw that X supports this but the version that comes with 2.1 doesn't.
>I need to things. First how to just upgrade X. (I don't want to go over to
>potato if I can avoid it), or how to replace it with a new version I
>compile my self.
I have a 2
> just finished version 1.0 of the Debian Laptop Proposal. Please
> let me know your thoughts about it.
it looks like a really good start. one thing that would be nice, though not
really laptop specific, would be some sort of easy sound config program like
redhat's sndconfig program.
laptops of
> just finished version 1.0 of the Debian Laptop Proposal. Please
> let me know your thoughts about it.
it looks like a really good start. one thing that would be nice, though not
really laptop specific, would be some sort of easy sound config program like
redhat's sndconfig program.
laptops of
NatePuri schrieb:
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 09:42:22PM +0200, Werner Heuser wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > just finished version 1.0 of the Debian Laptop Proposal. Please
> > let me know your thoughts about it.
>
> Where is it?
Sorry, http://www.snafu.de/~wehe/debian_linux.html
-werner-
NatePuri schrieb:
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 09:42:22PM +0200, Werner Heuser wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > just finished version 1.0 of the Debian Laptop Proposal. Please
> > let me know your thoughts about it.
>
> Where is it?
Sorry, http://www.snafu.de/~wehe/debian_linux.html
-werner-
18 matches
Mail list logo
