ubuntu, or with
> make-kpkg, and comes at the price of a small slowdown in the building of
> packages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier
> Cc: Ben Hutchings
Acked-by: maximilian attems
> ---
> scripts/package/builddeb | 50
> ++
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:46:54AM +0200, Anisse Astier wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier
> Cc: Ben Hutchings
Acked-by: maximilian attems
> ---
> scripts/package/builddeb | 12 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scrip
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:46:53AM +0200, Anisse Astier wrote:
> These little fixes should bring debian packaging closer to the way it's done
> in debian.
>
> Changes in:
> v2:
> - only build debug packages when CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y
> - build debug package last.
> - more verbose debug package d
> Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier
> Reviewed-by: Ben Hutchings
Acked-by: maximilian attems
> ---
> scripts/package/builddeb | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb
> index 0dbada8..06cd0c7
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:36:16PM +0200, Sébastien Dailly wrote:
>
>
> I'm available if you need more information. Do not hesitate to ask me !
This is *not* the way it works.
If an error occurs the bug submitter is meant to post the error.
Also it might be nice to post which version works or w
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:09:38PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On 23/07/13 18:48, Michael Prokop wrote:
> >[Cc-ing everyone who was involved in discussing #652459]
>
> (Also copying Adam Conrad and Steve Langasek.)
>
> >* Roger Leigh [Sun May 12, 2013 at 06:53:11PM +0100]:
> >
> >>And one final p
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:00:49PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 02:18:46PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > is there any good reason for the recommends of apparmor in the latest
> > linux packages?
>
> This is in response to a discussion that happened
hello,
upload sometime after 22UT today.
--
maks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 04:15:14PM +0300, riku.voi...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Riku Voipio
>
> By passing BUILD_SOURCE=y variable, make deb-pkg builds a debian source
> package. It will generate a minimal debian/rules file that calls back
> to make deb-pkg. Generated source package will build th
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 04:45:38PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 2015-04-16 15:42, riku.voi...@linaro.org wrote:
> > From: Riku Voipio
> >
> > create_package() function tries to resolve used architecture
> > for everry package. Split the setting the architecture to a
> > new function, set_debar
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:01:10PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On 22 April 2015 at 18:50, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > great this is a much requested feature for wider adoption of make
> > deb-pkg. In general acked-by me, just minor comment below.
> >
> >
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 01:06:07PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [ copied from debian-user again ]
>
> ---
> Got another system with the symptoms and managed to get a snapshot.
>
> It is really extremely weird. The kernel output is
>
> List of all partitions:
> No filesystem could mo
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 01:36:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 13:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > > At the moment only spl is available in the archive, using dkms, and
> > > for zfs it's similar in the way of packaging though not uploaded yet.
> > > What we have (cod
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 04:00:18PM +0800, Joseph Lee wrote:
>
> I am working on GSOC project "bootable clang built debian" and need to
> build Linux with clang. I used patches from LLVMLinux and add a new Kconfig
> file, modified debian/rules and debian/rules.real. May I report this as a
> bug(I a
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 04:00:18PM +0800, Joseph Lee wrote:
>
> I am working on GSOC project "bootable clang built debian" and need to
> build Linux with clang. I used patches from LLVMLinux and add a new Kconfig
> file, modified debian/rules and debian/rules.real. May I report this as a
> bug(I a
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:44:13PM +0800, Joseph Lee wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for reply.
>
> >why do you create a full new copy of a config, this is certainly not
> needed.
> An option in standard config file must be disable to pass compilation. I am
> not very familiar with how these options a
Hello everyone,
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:46:47PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We've been talking about this for at least 6 years, and it's well past
> time to do it.
thanks a lot Ben for pushing this.
> (I think most developers are already using git-svn, but that doesn't
> properly handle ta
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 06:10:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> No, I want that history and a break in history will just make my life
> harder. If you only want some of the branches you can get those.
Ok, so let's go for history.
> > > Known bugs:
> [...]
> > On the other hand, none of the
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 07:48:07PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 12:15 -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >
> > Greg KH announced that 4.9 would become the next LTS release:
> >
> > https://plus.google.com/+gregkroahhartman/posts/DjCWwSo7kqY
>
> Then that should be the versio
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> > stretch that gets longterm maintenance by Greg Kroah-Hartman. That
> > lasts 2 years from release, after which someone else (maybe me
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 03:30:37PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:42:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > Well, those efforts have not a good track record, afais Ben is maintaining
> > their lts Linus.
>
> I don't really un
Dear Alois Schlögl,
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 02:36:05PM +0200, Alois Schloegl wrote:
>
> We are looking into distributed, parallel filesystems like beegfs and
> orangefs. I'd prefer orangefs (mainly because of its license terms).
>
> We'd like to use Debian/stable for this set up, unfortunately,
s
> > architecture,
> > rather than for the architecture of the kernel being built.
> >
> > Tested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio
>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Hutchings
Acked-by: maximilian attems
> > ---
> > v2: commit
Dear Ozgur,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 10:29:56AM +0300, Ozgur wrote:
>
> thanks for reply and I'm using the stable version (Debian stretch). I updated
> last night and I don't seen any new kernel patch yet.
>
Please use a user list for your support, this mailing list is for development
purpose.
Dear Ben,
Anything we'd want to migrate from the old list?
thanks,
maks
- Forwarded message from alioth lists migration team
-
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 16:21:19 +0100
From: alioth lists migration team
To: kernel-svn-chan...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Notice of mailing list closure
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 01:40:09PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>
> On 4 April 2018 11:04:33 BST, maximilian attems wrote:
> >Dear Ben,
> >
> >Anything we'd want to migrate from the old list?
> [...]
>
> All VCS changes on Salsa are mailed out via tra
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:52:57PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> During the linux packaging BoF at DebConf, Ben asked for usefull
> upstream source handling. No compeling ones were mentioned.
>
> Some years ago (yes, years), I proposed some schema based on submodules,
> but never got around to ac
exceptional answer in spanish below.
--
Olá,
la lista es in inglés, adémas tu mail no contiene información útil
per resolvar la causa. si tu eres fisico debe hablar inglés?
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:30:41AM -0200, Manoel Pedro de Araújo wrote:
> Olá amigos estou com um problema em meu Bluetoot
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:38:39PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:38:25 +0100, Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 03:52:31PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> >> > Well, not wanting to relaunch th
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 08:01:38PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:32:29PM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > On dim, 2005-11-13 at 12:46 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > I think it is possible at least for initramfs-tools to run without sysfs
> > > on the building system.
> >
>
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 10:34:27PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:23:14PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 08:01:38PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:32:29PM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > > &g
reassign 323860 linux-image-2.6-686-smp
reassign 338973 linux-image-2.6-686-smp
merge 338973 323860
stop
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 06:11:13AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2
> Version: 2.6.14-2
> Severity: important
>
>
> The same bug as reported against earlier debian k
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:29:27AM +0100, Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
>
>
> Maximilian Attems wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:37:06AM +0100, Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
> >
> >
> >>with linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 my Logitech USB infrared mouse does not work
> >
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:22:59PM +0100, Joerg Morbitzer wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >please output of dmesg, it is a pain to diff syslog.
> >after boot: dmesg > dmesg-2.6.13
> Simply do "cat dmesg-2.6.14.txt | cut -d " " -f 6- "
cool, thanks for teaching me cut usage, never got to that..
> Howev
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 02:41:11PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> now that linux-headers-2.6.12-1-* is not available in sid anymore, I
> tried it with linux-headers-2.6.14-2-* (-sparc64 in this case). Besides
> the fact that the proper asm -> asm-sparc64 symlink was missing, the
> 2.6.14-2-* package
thanks paul traina for the provided fix.
solution is implemented in a different way:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ please open new bug reports for newer issues ]
aboves bug report was about enabling swsusp.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 11:39:13AM +0100, Thomas Maier wrote:
>
> I happily discovered that CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is enabled in my
> 2.6.14-2-686 kernel (version 2.6.14-3) and tried to suspend to disk.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 12:45:47PM +0100, Thomas Maier wrote:
> [not CCing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] at the request of Maximilian
> Attems, although I still don't think this bug should be closed]
please open a _new_ bug report, so the issue don't get lost.
> Am Dienstag, den 22.1
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:41:02PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Submitter reported additional information re initramfs-tools to d-s390
> mailing list [1]. Most relevant information (console messages) duplicated
> below.
ok thanks.
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 120k freed
> Loading, please wait.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 07:15:22PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:13:50AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Anyway, i will start with the powerpc situation :
> >
>
> parisc:
> - klibc will work after this patch is applied:
> http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2005-Nov
tags 341014 pending
stop
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 08:05:35PM +0100, Heikki Henriksen wrote:
>
> udev 0.76 failed to queue events correctly and didn't populate /dev at
> all using initramfs-tools. I only got a /dev/.udev/failed.
urggs indeed, will need another high urgency upload,
will do this aft
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:59:34PM -0600, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
> I cannot get 2.6.12 or 2.6.12 to boot because of the transition from
> devfs to udev, and the problem seems to lie with initrd.
>
initrd-tools is phasing out, if you use testing and udev 0.74
pick initramfs-tools 0.40 from unstabl
tags 341162 patch
thanks
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:20:18PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
>
> The mptspi module is required for at least some machines that use the mptscsih
> driver for the root device.
>
> Please bzr merge http://dannf.org/bzr/initramfs-tools
>
> (I'm new to bzr - is this the app
ed
> > > devices, which sound RCish for this case, what about those ? Also, more
> > I discussed these today with Maximilian Attems, initramfs-tools needed
> > to be updated and now that we have /dev/.udev/queue/ will be more
> > reliable.
indeed that's very cool,
w
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:04:59AM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > currently waiting for a patch from svenl to build against
> > linux-kernel-headers, status?
>
> Nope, sorry, i had no real time to investigate this more than
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:51:44AM +, Horms wrote:
> Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > H> If you know more, please add your knowledge below.
> >
> > [skip]
> >
> > 2.6.14-2 still enables the outdated ieee80211 :(
> >
> > Fixing this i
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:22:17PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:09:54AM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:51:44AM +, Horms wrote:
> > > Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Y
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 11:05:26AM +0100, giorgiove wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
hmm as it works for others that severity seems midly exagerated,
leave it to other d-kernel maintainer.
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:49:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 November 2005 11:44, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:22:17PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > Ok, so I should just go ahead and put my patch into the 2.6.14 branch?
> > > Or s
tags 341393 moreinfo
stop
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:27:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
>
> The mentioned kernel does not boot.
> It says, that IRQ routing is not possible.
> acpi=off and pci=routeirq have no effect.
what's the last error mess
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Frederik Schüler wrote:
> Author: fschueler-guest
> Date: Mon Nov 21 07:59:55 2005
> New Revision: 4856
>
> Modified:
>dists/trunk/linux-2.6/debian/bin/install-header
> Log:
> Comment out include/asm symlink deletion in the generic per-arch
> linux-headers package. This
please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev.
please add feedback to your bug report.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev.
please add feedback to your bug report.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev.
please add feedback to your bug report.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev.
please add feedback to your bug report.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
the various seen timing bugs should be fixed thanks to newer udev.
please add feedback to your bug report.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
clone 341559 -1
reassign -1 initramfs-tools
stop
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:33:10PM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 12:51:48PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > just saw your bugreport could you try latest initramfs-tools
> > from unstable too? would be
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:16:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 02:08:14PM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:41:01PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > > clone 341559 -1
> > > reassign -1 initramfs-tools
> > > st
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:50:46PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:27:35 +0100
> Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Now it worked! the initrd was created and the b
tags 337318 moreinfo
stop
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005, Martin Wilck wrote:
> ramfs. This means that vital module options cannot be passed to the
> initramfs system. For my laptop I need the line "options libata
> atapi_enabled=1"
> to be able to use my CD drive.
in which file to you add that line?
>
tags 337176 moreinfo
tags 337607 moreinfo
stop
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> The generated initrd has ld.so in /lib, but no /lib64 symlink. But the ELF
> interpreter of all amd64 binaries points to /lib64. So the kernel fails to
> load /bin/sh.
>
> I'm going to try with the d
tags 340508 moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:41:02PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Submitter reported additional information re initramfs-tools to d-s390
> > mailing list [1]. Most relevant information (console messa
tags 337176 -moreinfo
retitle 337176 troubles due to 32-bit chroot on amd64
severity 337176 important
severity 337607 normal
retitle 337607 Boot scripts tries to use not included ?mdrun?
stop
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 01:24:41PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I've got good news and bad news :-
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005, Frans Pop wrote:
> Reason is that the driver mtpspi (./message/fusion/mptspi.ko) is missing
> in the initrd.
>
> Modules mptbase and mptscsih are present, but these are not loaded
> automatically by udev and are anyway not sufficient to get the partitions
> recognized.
>
please take a look at belows BUG_ON()
at a quick glance didn't find a patch for that in git-commits-list.
belows kernel has all fixes from the latest 2.6.14.3 stable.
- Forwarded message from Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Bug#341392: linux-2.6: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:1807!
Da
"Frobnication executable not found"
fi
if [ ! -e "/dev/mapper/frobb" ]; then
panic "Frobnication device not found"
fi
log_begin_msg "Starting frobnication"
/sbin/frobnicate "/dev/mapper/frobb" || panic "Frobnication failed"
log_end_msg
exit 0
.fi
.RE
.SH AUTHOR
The initramfs-tools are written by Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
.PP
This manual was written by David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
updated by Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
tags 339091 pending
thanks
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005, David =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=A4rdeman ?= wrote:
> I hope this is sufficient:
>
yes! :)
> > i've included some small updates to it to match current state.
> > as it's late please proof read too ;-)
>
> I'll try to find time to proofread it later this we
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:39:42PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:55:55PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > can we put that patch in?
>
> No, it is NOT possible to build things against this package.
baah, it is.
please tell what is breaking because
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:29:39PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:49:49PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:39:42PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > No, it is NOT possible to build things against this package.
> > baah
reassign 342057 linux-2.6
tags 342057 upstream
stop
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005, Frans Pop wrote:
> After a test in vmware installing 2.6.14-4-686 using initramfs-tools, the
> system failed to reboot.
>
> AFAICT the initrd (udev?) failed to load the BusLogic module even though
> it is included in the
tags 342387 important
stop
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:54:40PM +0100, yoann wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Severity: critical
baah works for others downgrading.
> I had an oops on my box :
looks like one of those reiserfs races,
with some chances they are fixed
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> Downgrading a bug in a Debian package with the response 'use a package
> from somewhere outside Debian' doesn't feel right somehow.
>
> I understand that the kernel team is quite busy, and you can't fix every
> bug. If this is an ongoing issue, as I
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:51:15PM +0100, Matthias Erich Popp wrote:
> Why ist Kernel 2.4.27 the last Debian Kernel
> 2.4.32 can I find on www.kernel.org
the debian 2.4.27 has all the security fixes of 2.4.32
upgrade to 2.6, welcome to the present :)
there has been some activity lately concern
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:43:01PM +0100, Michael Meyer wrote:
> I would like to set up a kernel with sarge. But I do
> not know if there is a kernel available which has all
> the necessary security fixes?
> The precompiled kernel images of sarge all seem to be
> last updated before
> the release o
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005, Andrew Moise wrote:
> I don't know whether this is because of initramfs-tools or udev,
> or both, but when I upgraded them together they hit a spot of trouble:
well looks like you picked a bad combination,
we have a migration from udev files to initramfs-tools
please upgra
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:35:23PM +, Paul Brossier wrote:
> hi
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:17:11PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
> > it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
> > the various
this patch is an Xu legacy patch for modular ide-generic support.
build for smaller modular .configs and initrd-tools.
initrd-tools loads _all_ ide driver and lets them fight out:
the ones which don't unload stay.
the bad side effect of a winning ide-generic is !dma on that box
http://lists.debian
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:36:58PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
>
> The qla128
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 10:26:16AM +, Ricardo Ferreira wrote:
> I have the same problem. At first I thought it might be the way yaird was
> generating the ram disk, so I tried using initramfs-tools instead. This did
> not work (the error was about the same stated in other words in the boot
> pr
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:31:23PM +, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Author: waldi
> Date: Mon Dec 12 14:31:22 2005
> New Revision: 5008
>
> Modified:
>dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/bin/install-header
>dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/changelog
>dists/trunk/linux-2.6/debian/bin/install-header
>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:24:09PM +, Ricardo Ferreira wrote:
>
> Yup, that works, at least with initramfs-tools, will try going back to yaird
> later. Any comments on using one instead of the other?
they are very different.
initramfs-tools uses udev, bb and klibc and wants max hardware supp
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 11:33:06AM -0500, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 19:18 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > please retest with latest initramfs-tools in unstable aka version 0.41.
> > it needs latest udev 0.76-3 too.
> > the various seen timing
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:38:36AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 20:20 +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > ok, so the initramfs-tools bug seems to be run-init of klibc:
> > a bit hard to debug if it's not possible to get into the bb shell.
> > will
reassign 343363 kernel-package
stop
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 07:33:56PM +0100, Andrea Franzese wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
> Version: 2.6.14-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Installing (or upgrading) the package linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 the
> post-in
please attach to your response output of:
dmesg > dmesg.txt
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 274167 important
stop
as the bug submitter is speaking about unstable,
he should inbetween use 2.6.14 which has a much better reiserfs,
which still needs some SuSe patch massaging.
anyway if you are bound to 2.6.8 reiserfs is not a recommended
rockstable fs.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
severity 336153 important
stop
2.6.8 is known to have an fucked md and doesn't stand heavy fileload
unless you are lucky.
the archive features now 2.6.14 please try it out,
beware that the new initramfs generating tools are still in dev
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
tags #292290 important
stop
newer xfs would have needed serious core changes in 2.6.8.
the debian kernel team had been penalized by the unforseen
long sarge core freeze.
it's very unfortunate as xfs in debian's kernel had
special attention. ext2, ext3 is recommended for 2.6.8 usage.
if you are bo
hmm i'm not shure it deserves the "critical" stamp.
anyway could you lvm2 maintainer look into that #320312.
thanks :)
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 320312 normal
tags 320312 morinfo
stop
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:46:58PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:32:58PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > hmm i'm not shure it deserves the "critical" stamp.
>
> No it does not. The sys
reassign kernel-package
stop
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:48:55PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686
> Version: 2.6.14+2.6.15-rc5-0experimental.1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> After installing linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 and rebooting,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:31:33PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:50:48PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > - hppa
> >
>
> I need to re-rename the kernel images for hppa. Somehow they got
> reverted from "parisc" and "parisc64" back to the unclear "32" and "64".
>
>
please try the attached patch,
should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
patch -p1 /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev <
ide-generic.udev.patch
for this trial please remove any ide-generic or ide-disk
out of /etc/mkinitramfs/modules, then update-initramfs -
unmerge 337497
severity 337497 important
tags 337497 moreinfo
stopped
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:41:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Notice that there is no ide-generic module on powerpc, and never has been, so
> i fail to understand what i should test ?
>
indeed your bug report was falsly m
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 23 December 2005 14:34, maximilian attems wrote:
> > please try the attached patch,
> > should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
>
> Although my initial report was for Sparc (which I will test tomorr
the bug your reported at the beginning of your bug report
regarding initramfs-tools was a timing bug by udev,
which is fixed since long.
please retest against latest 2.6.14 in unstable
usinig initramfs-tools?
thanks for your feedback.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
maybe not really the last, but 2.6.14-7 is scheduled for tomorrow.
contains 2.6.14.5 with networking, scsi and nfs security fix.
please rush in if you have any additions.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
> I also see this bug, using initramfs-tools 0.44 and
> linux-image-2.6.14-2-386 (2.6.14-6).
could you try the attached hook file,
please place it under /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/
and recreate the initramfs: update-initramfs -u
hope i
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Laurent Neiger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since I upgraded from linux-image-2.6.12 to linux-image-2.6.14 my
> ali5451 soundcard is no more able of playing any sound...
> I've tried all the successives revisions of 2.6.14 but it really seems
> it's since the change 2.6.12/2.6.14 th
cher Laurent!
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Laurent Neiger wrote:
> first of all many thanks for your so quick answer.
:)
> Unfortunately, upgrading to 2.6.15 didn't solve my problem.
> Messages in /var/log/dmesg (or boot or syslog) are just the same, there
> is an error while loading the ali5451 modul
1 - 100 of 4160 matches
Mail list logo
