In the kernel BoF from DebConf, people generally agreed that it would
be a good plan to organise a real-life meeting. I'm more than happy to
spend Debian funds to make that happen, if needed.
Where are people located, and what would be convenient time(s) and
location(s) for travel?
--
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:56:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> In the kernel BoF from DebConf, people generally agreed that it would
>> be a good plan to organise a real-life meeting. I'm more than happy to
&
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 05:24:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:56:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> In the kernel BoF from DebConf, people generally agreed that it would
>>>
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:42:39PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>On Fri, 07 Aug 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 17:24 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> [...]
>> > That sounds like a good thing to go on the agenda for a RL meeting, in
>> &g
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:02:30PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:55:18AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> OK, cool. Any word on that?
>
>yes free, thanks for asking back..
Excellent. :-)
>> Assuming that works for maks, then we shou
if you want to stay there then it would probably be sensible to
work out sharing rooms.
Talk to me? :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Debian Project Leader
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
eds of the kernel d-i teams can better be reconciled
I'm guessing that quite a number of people may be interested in these,
and in other topics. Is there anything else I'm missing that you would
like to discuss?
Then: when and where would be a good time to meet up?
Cheers,
--
Steve McI
Once more, with correct addresses. :-/
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:53:58PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>Apologies for the massive cross-posting, but I'm trying to arrange
>some discussions between the various teams, or at least those members
>who will be at FOSDEM
>On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:53:58PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>Hi folks,
>>
>>Apologies for the massive cross-posting, but I'm trying to arrange
>>some discussions between the various teams, or at least those members
>>who will be at FOSDEM. Topics I&#x
s from debian-edu
now. I don't expect any problems.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:30:00PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>Steve McIntyre writes:
>
><...>
>> The main focus of the meeting was how d-i builds and releases work,
>> and I think we made quite some progress on that. There are a few
>> changes that we thin
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi guys,
As mentioned a few months back, we're using several of these machines
as build daemons for the armel architecture. More details at
http://blog.einval.com/2010/09/27#marvell_buildds
We were hoping that these machines could be made to w
Fair enough, that's good for me. I'm busy-ish for the next couple of
weekends anyway (as a data point).
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
ff -u config.orion5x config.mv78xx0 | wc -l
112
Looking into an equivalent for sid right now.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"I've only once written 'SQL is my bitch' in a comment. But that code
is in use on a military site...&
set
CONFIG_CACHE_FEROCEON_L2=y
+CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
##
## file: drivers/ata/Kconfig
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.deb
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:36:53AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 15:49 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Following up on the conversation from last week...
>>
>> Attached is a diff for squeeze. This kernel boots and runs fine on
>> arne.debian.org, ju
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:20:20AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:36:53AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 15:49 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> Following up on the conversation from last week...
>>>
>>> Attache
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:20:20AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:36:53AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 15:49 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> Following up on the conversation from last week...
>>>
>>> Attache
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:34:35AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 14:55 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:20:20AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:36:53AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> >>On
e existing tarballs and zip files
of firmware. firmware-brcm80211 is now included and will be in future
builds.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Mature Sporty Personal
More Innovation More Adult
A Man in Dandism
Powered Midship Spec
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen linux-libc-dev_$ARCH
>
>or rather:
>
>fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-libc-dev_$ARCH
Awesome, thanks. :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
You raise the blade, you make the change... You
e first weekend in March and catching up on sleep
on the second.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
You lock the door
And throw away the key
There's someone in my head but it's not me
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.de
[ Coming back to this as I'm playing with my ia64 machine a little
again... ]
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:00:53AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:32:18AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:11:36AM
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:29:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>At Ben's suggestion, I've tried adding kernel command line options to
>the normal squeeze kernel (linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley
>2.6.32-46). "swiotlb=force" makes no noticeable difference, but
>&
change protected_hardlinks to be a per-filesystem
mount option. By all means protect the root filesystem etc., but for a
purely data-carrying filesystem it's a bit obstructive.
What do you think?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Google-bait: h
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 03:31:03AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 15:30 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> Alternatively, I'm pondering: if the main thrust of the hardlink
>> protection is to prevent attacks against system files, then it might
&g
uld post a wishlist bug to,
>I'd love to have the yaboot bootloader creation script be as smart as
>the one for grub about "Hey! There's only one OS here."
>
>With the above-described workarounds, all went well with the post-
>installation reb
Worked OK at the last BSP we did, tbh...
>So dear FTP masters, CD team, Press team: Would one out of Sep 22/29/30
>work out for all of you?
>
>Dear Kernel team: Which changes are still pending for 6.0.6? When could
>we get them into the archive? For 22nd we'd close p-u-NEW on the
reassign 699416 firmware-iwlwifi
thanks
Reassigning to firmware-iwlwifi, not a CD-specific issue...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
< liw> everything I know about UK hotels I learned from "Fawlty Towers"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
As discussed with Ben, this is blatantly a kernel bug. Strace output
attached. The mount() syscall never returns. Debugging further now.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Every time you use Tcl, God kills a kitten." -- Malcolm Ray
23
a basic installation done, then test different kernels.
Also found that the kernel in wheezy d-i B4
(linux-image-3.2.0-4-mckinley_3.2.32-1_ia64.deb) causes the machine to
lock up while loading the initramfs \o/
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Arm
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:32:18AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:11:36AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
>>> But information about what kernels work with IDE disks would certainly
>>> be welcome.
>>
>> 2
for a point release, but it will slow down the
CD release until I can test.
>May 19/20:
Works for me.
>May 26/27:
No chance, I'll be in Hong Kong on a work trip!
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Google-bait: http://www.debia
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 09:25:17PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:22:12PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>> >May 12/13: York BSP. Probably not the best time for CDs, given that
>>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
>On Wed, 25, Apr, 2012 at 09:32:51PM +0100, Steve McIntyre spoke thus..
>> That will help, but then the issue is more a problem with downloading
>> the images. I've got a full mirror at home, which helps immensely wit
le of debian-cd bugs that needed fixing. All done now, though -
please go ahead!
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Every time you use Tcl, God kills a kitten." -- Malcolm Ray
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 11:20:25PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Steve McIntyre (2024-12-15):
>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 05:14:55PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> >And yes: we should definitely ensure that the first image in each set
>> >has linux-image-$foo and
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 06:58:18PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 05:14:55PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 04:38:57AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>>
>>>Any thoughts about my proposal to lift that expectation?
>>
&
Control: forcemerge 1088605 1084789
(#1088605 is very clearly caused by the many sets of udebs, I think)
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 04:38:57AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Cc += ftp team (for input), kernel team (for information)
ACK, thanks - should have thought of that!
>Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 05:14:55PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 04:38:57AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>
>>Any thoughts about my proposal to lift that expectation?
>
>That looks eminently possible as a workaround at the very
>least. Working on i
a lot of UEFI implementations support this yet. Tianocore does,
> and I've heard modern Dell, Lenovo and HP systems do too.
Nod. It's something I've spoken to various vendors about. The lack of
https and redirects is limiting, but we can hope they will improve.
--
Steve McIn
cd@ to make sure it's getting (cherry-)picked up,
>merged, or whatever, so that it's used for RC 1. Thanks!
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/debian-cd/-/commit/513684f3f7ec53bdbd7f177ec53f60c8a31656a5
That's cool - we're still using master for Trixie at th
ithout the other would only mean wasting people's time, I
> fear.
> - Plus the huge extra cost for the initrd (size-wise) is clearly not
> worth it at this time.
ACK.
>Also, I suggest turning the firmware-intel-sound topic into a dedicated
>bug report, instead of keeping it entangled with firmware-sof-signed in
>this overlong thread plus merge requets / commit comments on Salsa…
*Definitely*
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Dance like no one's watching. Encrypt like everyone is.
- @torproject
101 - 143 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
