On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:20:20AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:36:53AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 15:49 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>> Following up on the conversation from last week... >>> >>> Attached is a diff for squeeze. This kernel boots and runs fine on >>> arne.debian.org, just tested. The diff between the new config.mv78xx0 >>> and config.orion5x is tiny (mostly comments), but they're not >>> compatible as a single flavour: >> >>Right. But I look at these two configurations and cannot understand the >>reasoning behind the driver selection. >> >>They have PCI, but a lot of PCI drivers disabled. I assume this is >>because there are no PCI slots? If that is the case then there are a >>whole lot more PCI drivers that cannot be used and should be disabled, >>which will cut the compile time down significantly. > >Ah, no. They have PCI slots and could probably support most PCI >things, I just didn't consider that so far, basing on config.orion5x. >Is it preferred to add everything that might work for these boards, or >acceptable to go for a more minimal config to help reduce build time?
Ping? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon Rabone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120201145531.gc7...@einval.com
