tags 719357 patch
tags 623377 patch
thanks
With Luk's approval, I've prepared an NMU to address these two bugs in
rpcbind. Please find the NMU diff attached.
This NMU will be uploaded to unstable shortly.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
Hey Bastian,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:56:54AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:15:31AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > + * Fix to look directly in /run instead of via the /var/run symlink.
> Where is the bug report for this?
This is mentioned in
2.4 kernels. (Obviously, d-i can install
whichever is better from an installer POV instead.)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:31:28AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 08:38:03PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:38:41PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > I still think choice is good, and also what users expect of debian. A sane
>
nlevel manager in Debian and
millions of people use it, if no one has yet reported breakage as a result
of not sourcing .sh scripts, my concern about this breaking "unrelated
packages or the whole system" is invalid. Downgrading again, with
apologies.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
0, and 2.3.5-8 is the first version to build
with gcc-3.4?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
which didn't make sense; then I realized that none of the other syscalls I
was looking at were *returning* a non-zero errno, just a return value. So
this second simple patch applied after the first should get us a completely
working initramfs-tools on alpha, AFAICT.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
ng a second SCSI controller in the
box so I could make some headway on d-i for etch.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www
sion that needs to be made together with the people who will be
doing security support for the kernel in etch.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rs and programmers easier, i
> think we all agree with that, or we would still be using boot-floppies :)
I'm all in favor of streamlining the integration of new kernel versions into
the installer, but I don't believe that the majority of the work involved
falls into the "automata
ith ourselves about the
difficulties involved.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
le to release 2.6
> > kernels for etch without a clear and automated upgrade path from sarge
> > (i.e., 2.4).
> svn already has initramfs-tools | yaird, as will 2.6.15-2 when it is uploaded.
Ok, an easy closure for the changelog then.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
r with any previous 2.6
kernels and can't tell you whether it worked with them.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:35:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:08:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.14-7
> > Severity: important
> > Sigh, can't get a break with alpha kernel support around here
M. Instead, my plan had been to, over the next month or two, review the
past discussions of this point, talk the issue over with various folks, and
propose a GR that would clarify this interpretation of the DFSG where
firmware is concerned. If the "discussion" part is
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:09:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:51:46AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:35:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:08:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
the BSP way, it has to make clear that it had to be a long
> standing and coordinated effort, since random patches of dubious quality will
> probably only make matters worse for the kernel team..
Seems like a poor fit for a BSP then, IMHO. BSPs work best when you can put
people to work immed
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:38:21AM -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:45:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > You may redistribute the hardware specific firmware binary file
> > > under the following terms:
> > > 1. Redistri
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.15-1
Severity: grave
Hah, this is special. So I tried to upgrade my kernel in order to test bug
#347186, and I can't mount my /usr partition due to missing symbols in
xfs.ko:
$ nm -u /lib/modules/2.6.15-1-alpha-generic/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko |grep cmpx
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:16:59PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> the fact that the mips/mipsel guys do their own thing in their own way is i
> >> believe etch-RC though, and need to be solved in the next 6 month.
> > That's a decisio
l vidcard access; but I guess that's the fbdev
driver, anyway.
So the real target for all of this was to get matroxfb working to the point
of running bterm successfully from the debian installer; and even with fbcon
working, in 2.6.14 running bterm or fbi gives me a whole lot of nothing
(console blanks, nothing gets displayed). I'll give this another try with
2.6.15 once I've got my /usr partition mounting again.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
has been proposed, to use the always_inline
attribute explicitly for this function, but it remains to be implemented --
I don't have space here to do test kernel builds for alpha without doing a
lot of shuffling, and nobse hasn't gotten back to me on it since the day we
had that discussion o
supported, I'm not
willing to hack up prctl's source to use __NR_osf_setsysinfo instead. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:42:06PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:06:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > So please make it work; knowing this exists and should be supported, I'm not
> > willing to hack up prctl's source to use __NR_osf_setsysinf
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:42:06PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:06:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > So please make it work; knowing this exists and should be supported, I'm not
> > willing to hack up prctl's source to use __NR_osf_setsysinf
27;s documented in
linux/prctl.h. :) So here's a tested patch which does this. Ugly as sin,
but I'm at a loss for how you'd make this pretty...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
2.6.12 or 2.6.15 is the
break point, no. :P
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.15-5
Severity: important
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:46:01PM -0500, Jay Estabrook wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:51:45AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > As of two days ago, the debian-installer svn tree has been switched to use
> > Linux 2.6.15
ing on
reboot/power failure is *worse* than this.
> - Refuse to start on startup if no compatible version is found.
What does this mean, exactly? Should that be "upgrade" instead of
"startup"? And how does that help us improve users' experience when
upgrading?
--
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:37:21AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Anyway, I don't see that this is a very good solution. Disabling all of the
> > available boot options for the system doesn't prevent in
er kernel is booted into.
- Doesn't fuck the system if you lose power part-way through the
dist-upgrade after udev has been unpacked and no newer kernel has been
installed.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:54:01PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 03:45:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Then what does this have to do with the problem people are trying to solve?
> > The problem is that there is *no* kernel available in sarge that meet
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:45:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:21:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - Doesn't fuck the system if you lose power part-way through the
> >dist-upgrade after udev has been unpacked and no newer kernel has b
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:57:27PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:30:51PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > No, they need to reboot after installing udev/lvm, not before.
> > Then you've once again left the user without any assurance that their sy
riosity? This doesn't seem like a temporary
problem; I think this is an issue that will be just as applicable for etch+1
as it is for etch, and I think we should be honest about that.
I also think it's within the realm of reason for us to decide that source
for things like firmware, f
froman Alpha expert at HP:
---
From: Jay Estabrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: testing wanted: debian-installer, now with 2.6.15
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:53:43 -0500
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 03:41:24AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
= 4
read(3, 0x120018000, 1024) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address)
With coreutils cat, it does at least output the contents ("6") before
exiting with the error; with busybox cat, there is no output, breaking
language autodetection in the installer.
This worked fine wit
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:11:34AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:20:02PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This means you're not guaranteed to get /usr/sbin/sshd, which many admins
> > use exclusively for system administration where remote kvm is n
testing,
and its 2.4 metapackages depend on other packages that no longer exist in
unstable. This source package appears to not serve any purpose at all
today.
If you can confirm, please reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org to request
removal.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever lo
etc/kernel-img.conf, and it overwrites the initrd image
without asking, but what *broke*?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 09:19:29AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:49:42PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Um. How does this "break unrelated software"?
> Yes. The kernel image depends on both. So yaird is unrelate
to be fixed... anyway, nic-extra-modules just
repackages the module from the kernel image, so let's reassign it there.
Does this driver work for you if you boot with the "linux26" option? Does
it work with the etch installer?
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me
amfs-tools on upgrade from a 2.6.8
kernel.
In each case there are workarounds, but we really want to be able to break
this dependency loop.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the wo
tools, help coordinate with
> xen's upstream, debian glibc and d-i, etc! Especially if you and other people
> who would do both can still do it! :)
As an erstwhile contributor to the kernel team who's also interested in Xen
packaging, you have my answer above...
--
Steve
obviously not shipping a 2.6.12 kernel for etch, so I
wouldn't bother uploading that part...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
uld you please confirm that this is the case with the current 2.6.15
kernel in unstable? I don't want to recommend a change to the upstream
kernel driver maps based only on unconfirmed, historical problems with the
de2104x driver.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long e
fellows has written in his blog would be petty and immature, and would
not exactly be the kind of encouragement one would hope to see from the
kernel team seeking the input of others interested in Xen packaging.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian D
nd that you keep quiet altogether until the
committee asks for your input.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debia
efit of older kernel
versions; can you assure us that this aspect of the driver design is
unchanged from 2.6.8 through 2.6.15?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
he actual bug we've been asked to rule on, I'll reassign
it back to yaird and you can take as long as you want to resolve it via your
private war, since that seems to matter more to you than actually persuading
the TC.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2006-03-09 19:46
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:0b.0/driver ->
../../../bus/pci/drivers/CMD64x_IDE
$
However, /sys/block/hda/device still points to the right place, and it's my
understanding that /sys/block is what yaird walks, so this still is no
explanation for ho
yaird to only load ide-generic on this system, since
cmd64x, while loaded, is not associated with the root device (according to
sysfs or otherwise).
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the worl
> > > > area.
> > > How does it find the device and then the driver starting from block ?
> > $ readlink /sys/block/hda/device
> > ../../devices/ide0/0.0
> This is the ide-generic node, right ?
Yes.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
what changed re. version.h files
> is
> helpful:
What is the m-a command you're issuing?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 07:55:59AM +0100, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:04:09PM +0100, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> >> Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp
> >> Version: 2.6.16-2
> >> Followup-For: Bug #358512
>
ly overinflated; nobody else seems to be
experiencing these problems with iptables.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
packages should at least be functional enough on 2.4 to allow a full upgrade
and subsequent reboot to a new kernel. (That includes not breaking the
system if the upgrade is interrupted and the system is rebooted again to a
2.4 kernel before the upgrade completes.)
--
Steve Langasek
the archive.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is conversation before on IRC, and I don't believe there is any
evidence that this is the case. Until you can show some, I regard this bug
as release-critical.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
s* the problem we need to address there
are way we could do it with much less collateral damage. I would be more
than happy to discuss with you guys possible designs for this; at the
moment, though, I'm afraid I think the problem space is too ill-defined and
needs
ide support for 2.4
in etch.
This AFAIK will satisfy Joey's need for interim 2.4 compatibility, while
making it clear that the upgrade to 2.6 needs to happen before the etch+1
release.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 13 April 2006 22:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I think etch should support 2.4 in the sense of "upgrade support only";
> > i.e., it should support 2.4 because we need to be able to install etch
>
linux-image
is deferred
- if linux-image is configured, and a hook script is installed afterwards,
update-initramfs is called once by each package -- and even if the
initramfs generated by the first call isn't bootable, there should still
be initramfs'es from previous images that
eds to be updated first? I haven't
heard anything about this incompatibilty, and would like to understand it
before endorsing a versioned conflict; there's a very good chance that a
versioned conflict with grub would force removal, not upgrade, of the
bootloader.
Thanks,
be painful.
> If the debian-release team decides to come up with minimum system
> requirements
> for etch, I think a good place to aim for i386 would be slightly less than
> whereever the freekbox spec is at the time.
Oh, well, I still have an AMD K6-450 with 128MB running sarge as my p
er of modules common to older hardware would be
feasible.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:19:25AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:52:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 12:45:48AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:51:22PM -
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: normal
In all Debian kernel packages above 2.6.8, sound is completely broken on my
laptop. Trying to adjust volume settings gives me errors of this sort in the
kernel log:
Aug 6 04:57:27 mauritius kernel: codec_write 0: semaphore
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:44:00PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> tags 322533 + fixed-upstream
> thanks
> On Thursday 11 August 2005 11:14, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > codec_write 0: semaphore is not ready for register 0x2
> > Under 2.6.8, the following modules are loade
as the default kernel in
testing, because it probably won't take long to propagate.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ut a bit before the release.
Yes, for this you should be able to upload to the "stable" queue on
ftp-master.debian.org at any time. Your r1 updates should have a later
version number than your proposed security updates, so that the one with
the more complete set of fixes
release cycle for those architectures where they believe they are no
longer needed. Together with working out which ports are actually viable
for etch under the new requirements (which of course first requires fully
specifying those requirements), we should be able to get a clear pictur
kernel-images in the
> archive since they are still more stable on some machines.
Is it? There were no hppa 2.4 kernels included in sarge, because we
were told by Thibaut that the upstream branch was rotting and not worth
including. Is there really a reason to think it will be in *better*
sh
, but 2.6 doesn't currently work on my own alpha so
I haven't been particularly motivated to fix up d-i to use it until I
can usefully test it.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
e it looks like udev is
going to be ready to go into testing before linux-2.6, and the breakage
of new udev with old kernel is much worse than the breakage of old udev
with new kernel, I think it would be a good idea to keep a bug open on
udev for right now, even if the kernel maintainers obje
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:48:17PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> (pruning CC list; AFAIK all will still get the message this way)
> On Tuesday 30 August 2005 04:56, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > So we're going to have another release with a very elaborate upgrade
> > > p
Can anyone confirm whether this bug still applies to
the kernel-headers-2.6.11-powerpc in testing, or to the
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc in unstable?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I
an ftp team task, not a
release team task.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Descripti
egarding the out-of-date hppa packages.
Please get an ftp-master to rene the old binaries, and then linux-2.6
can go into testing.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EM
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:32:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I don't see any reason here for the release team to override the
> > out-of-date hppa packages. Removing them is an ftp team task, not a
&
he
> beta as soon as daily CD building is back up.
2.6.12 has now entered testing.
> initrdfs is a separate issue, and really two issues.
I guess you mean initramfs here?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:17:44AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> In linux.debian.maint.boot Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Marco d'Itri has also talked about his plans to incorporate coldplug
> >into udev. If we have coldplug, do we need a separate
For existing packages, /org/ftp.debian.org/katie/melanie -n -R -s
warns you of any packages left uninstallable (or
unbuildable due to build-dependencies) by a removal.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
tegrity
> Error while decompressing
Sorry, but this error is completely unreproducible here; I don't think it's
actually present in the package in the archive. Can you try re-installing
the package to confirm?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough an
Please keep the bug report address in the cc: list on replies.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:56:55AM -0700, Fenrir wrote:
> On 9/25/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 10:02:21PM -0700, Fenrir wrote:
> > > Package: kernel-source-2.4.27-
and they aren't reproducible anywhere
else...
Can you please forward us the output of these two commands?
$ dpkg -l bzip2 libbz2-1.0
$ debsums -s bzip2 libbz2-1.0
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it o
0 is not installed
Ok. Could you try upgrading libbz2-1.0 to the matching version in testing
(1.0.2-8.1) and see if that fixes the problem?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can mo
nel package, it's a bug in the
bzip2 packages... reassigning.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The
debian-testing list exists to handle problems with the actual process of
upgrading, not to address problems with any individual package as a result
of upgrading.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
orlon vorlon 0 2005-10-08 03:28 foo_not_8.3.txt
-rw--- 1 vorlon vorlon 0 2005-10-08 03:28 fOO_not_8.3.txt
$
This poses a significant compatibility problem when sharing vfat volumes
between Debian and Windows (which, y'know, is the whole point).
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
ge-$KERNEL_MAJOR-$1$SMP"
> s390.sh:echo "kernel-image-$KERNEL_ABI-s390"
> sparc.sh: imgbase=kernel-image
> i386, alpha, s390, sparc, powerpc only use it for 2.4 kernels.
Does this mean that these archs are now using linux-image-$foo for 2.6
kernels, or th
cible using your above test case.
The missing variable appears to be that I am mounting my partition using
-oiocharset=utf8. If I use -oisocharset=iso8859-1 (the default), the mount
behaves in a case-insensitive manner, but of course I don't want filenames
to be shown as ISO8859-1 in userspace..
C
c x86 and
> generic x86-smp?
"Still"? When was this ever the plan?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ht
a from non-Debian sources.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
SMB file system support (OBSOLETE, please
> use CIFS)". Just follow it and use cifs.
No, we've already discussed this on IRC. CONFIG_SMB_FS should not be
disabled in etch, the userspace support isn't there to give us feature
parity via CIFS.
--
Steve Langasek
600 lines diff.
Have you gotten any closer to finding the cause of this regression?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://
side is
really considering 2.6.25 to be an option for lenny, and the sooner we get
2.6.26 into unstable the sooner we can get everything smoothed out for
lenny.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
# recommends are not serious
severity 492301 normal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t; - Definitions for AF_WANPIPE socket
Seems ok, any regression is going to be very localized.
If someone can take care of patching the two issues mentioned above, then
I'm happy with a 2.6.26 upload to unstable. Otherwise I'll work on the
patch myself tomorrow night.
--
Steve Langas
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:38:56PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:09:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:20:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Following the discussion some weeks ago I have a patch to fix most of
>
1 - 100 of 440 matches
Mail list logo
