this problem seems completely different to the problem that I had.
Could you please post report to the upstream maintainers,
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
d was released using k-p 9.008.4. 10.00x seems
to be in pretty good shape now, unless something nasty is
lurking deeper in my INBOX. Manoj, please upload at will.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sing was a prebuilt Debian kernel. I'm not sure how
> to rebuild it from source. Horms, if you could point me in the right
> direction, I'll give it a try.
That depends exactly what you want to build. To just make an image
for testing, upacking the tarball supplied by linux-source-2
llow users to access
arbitary (unsafe) ioctls, that sounds like a can of worms to me.
I have CCed the SCSI maintainers for comment.
For their reference, your original post and patch, allong with
the rest of this thread is at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/11/msg00748.html
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ies. And in this case at least 2) shows us that
there is actually a slightly deeper problem that needs to
be addresses. I'd be surprised if we really end up needing
1).
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h,snd_seq_virmidi,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq,snd_emu10k1,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq_device,snd_ac97_codec,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_timer,snd_hwdep
> soundcore 9696 1 snd
> rtc12472 1 snd_rtctimer
>
> Thanks
> Waldo Cancino
>
>
>
>
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ld be done.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: bterm exits with segmentation fault on Sun Ultra 1 Creator 3d
> Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64' to
> `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64'.
>
>> reassign 261368 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64-smp
> Bug#261368: swf-player: swf_play oops on sparc64-smp
> Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc64-smp'
> Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc64-smp' to
> `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64-smp'.
>
>> reassign 281511 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32
> Bug#281511: kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc32: kernel paging request oops
> Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc32'
> Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc32' to
> `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32'.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 252289 +wontfix
tag 252289 +upstream
thanks
Is this bug reproducable with 2.4.27-11 and 2.6.14-3
(or whatever is the latest in sid when you read this).
I'm taging this as wontfix, as its assigned to 2.4.27 and
the chance of a fix not requiring a significant backport
seems remote.
--
this turned
out to mean that FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE needed to be manually loaded
on systems that were previously using vga=... This can be
fixed by telling the initrd generator to load FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE
on boot, however as of -3 it is built into the kernel to avoid
this problem.
--
Horms
--
To
s.
Hi,
Most likely you are seeing #333052/#333522 which I believe is fixed
by installing module-init-tools 3.2-pre9-4
If pain persists could you please report which version
of the kernel, udev and module-init-tools you are using.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Horms and Maximilian Attems, how does your discussion relate to the
> bugs reports you are including in CC?
>
> I thought that "Considering my previous comment, this does not seems
> to be really relevant." was a polit
merge 339487 339485
thanks
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> This should be merged with 339487
>
> (typed "--body" option rather than "--body-file")
Merging as requested.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
lly printed on the card. As I found
> out, these seem to be SB16's without a MIDI interface (but with OPL3).
Hi,
As this is almost certainly an ALSA bug, could you take a few moments
to log your report with the ALSA maintainers, as per the instructions
on:
http://www.mailarchives.
Ralf Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: us-ascii, 15 lines --]
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 12:25:11PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>> tag 340108 +upstream
> [...]
>> As this is almost certainly an ALSA bug, could yo
.6.15-preN) trees in SVN. A summary
of the change follows. Interested parties, please comment/revert
as needed.
--
Horms
-CONFIG_MKISS=m
Index: debian/arch/powerpc/config
Index: debian/arch/ia64/config
Index: debian/arch/alpha/config.alpha-generic
Index: debian/arch/alpha/config.alpha-smp
Index: de
st
excllent practice.
In all cases, please report which version of the package
you are using, e.g. kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-12.
And if you have a bug which you think needs to cover
multiple kernel versions, its probably best to just
report it against one and ask if it should be clonned
in the bug report. Its pretty easy to duplicate the bug
and reassign it if needed.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as the somewhat ancient 2.6.8.
Signed-off-by: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
index 1e15313..e430717 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static const struct drive_list_entry dri
sponsor my uploads.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:10:05AM +0200, Colin Leroy wrote:
> On 07 Oct 2005 at 13h10, Horms wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I took a look at making a backport, and it seems that
> > some of the problems are there, but without a deeper inspection
> > of the code its dif
e
> in? I'd be happy to do it myself, but of course I can't.
>
> Richard.
I will put the follwing into svn which should effect the change.
--
Horms
Index: debian/arch/i386/defines
===
--- debian/arch/i386/d
re (unfortunately bugzilla doesn't play well
with the debian BTS). James Courtier-Dutton recently posted
(to another bug) about how he would like ALSA bugs handled.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338606;msg=15
Thanks
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ieee80211_crypt: registered algorithm 'NULL'
>
> Latest ieee80211-source give the same result.
There is a known problem with the ieee80211 in Linus' tree being
out of date. Its slowly being discussed on debian-kernel.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/11/msg01
antly newer kernel,
helps your immediate problem.
http://packages.vergenet.net/sarge-backports/
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> H> If you know more, please add your knowledge below.
>
> [skip]
>
> 2.6.14-2 still enables the outdated ieee80211 :(
>
> Fixing this is simply a matter of disabling CONFIG_IEEE80211. This
> will allow to use ipw
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:09:54AM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:51:44AM +0000, Horms wrote:
> > Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > H
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: us-ascii, 15 lines --]
>
> Horms wrote:
>> Holger kindly reminded me on IRC yesterday that its been
>> a long time since a new 2.4.27 was uploaded into Sarge.
>> He point
m->report_list.next;
That seems fine enough to me. Do you know of any side effects of
using this patch. Or do you considere it a candidate for inclusion
in a Sarge update.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at odd times. For example, I have a rule that
> will DROP ssh connections if there have been more than 6 seen in the
> last 60 seconds, but (seemingly) randomly I will get DROPped on the
> first connection.
Lets be quite clear, the ip_recent code is in dire need of a rewrite.
--
Horms
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:49:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> On Wednesday 30 November 2005 11:44, Maximilian Attems wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:22:17PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>&g
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:44:29PM -0800, Dan Aronson wrote:
> Horms,
> I don't know why I didn't see it yesterday when I looked, but this
> seems to be the same bug
> as 316848. Sorry for making you reply again. I'll be even more careful
> next time.
No probl
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:37:57PM -0800, Dan Aronson wrote:
> As I wrote, the in 2.6.12 the driver now reports that there is a BIOS
> bug, but then recovers
> and finishes loading, I haven't yet tried a device on it, but it does
> show up correctly
> in /proc/bus/usb/devices
we don't drop M386 support at all, and switch to M486?
> The alternative would be investigate the changes and fix all concerned
> code, which I sincerely don't have the time to do.
>
> Current post-sarge kernels won't work on "real i386" systems anyway,
> sinc
ut there reading .extraversion, eg. #333842. But
> it otherwise seems a good solution to me that doesn't require unsharing
> the Makefile.
Manoj,
being the extraversions expert, do you have any thoughts on this.
The current situation seems less than ideal.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
err(),
perhaps dbg() would be more appropriate. Trivial patch for reference:
PCI hotplug: Be slightly quieter about shpc_cap_offset == 0
It seems that the following message, logged as err() can show
up during normal boots.
See: http://bugs.debian.org/341761
Sig
as the last one was
on a lost laoptop and revoked. I belive that the new key
is in the keyring. If you want to drop by Tokyo and sign it,
feel free. Alternatively, I'll be at LCA2006 in Dunedin next month.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
debian/ sarge-proposed-security-updates main
If you know of new security bugs, and they aren't in
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/patch-tracking/?rev=0&sc=0
then send a note here, to the testing-security team, or
open a bug in the BTS.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
27;m happy to do some more builds, but doing all of them is a little
daunting.
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kernel-avail.html
Also, if an arch should not be built lets start a list.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
by the GNU assembler 'as'). It seems that there is a
> problem between gcc-3.3 and binutils (at least for 'as').
Perhaps the bug should be reassigned to gcc or binutils.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-u" on the same input file), and found a number of
> options duplicated in debian/arch/config. This patch removes the
> duplicates and should apply cleanly against current SVN.
Thanks, applied.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
een signed off by Tom Rini, and forwarded to Paulus, and is
> indeed going upstream, will commit to svn, so it will be in -3.
On Sven's request I have added this patch to SVN,
it should appear in linux-2.6 2.6.15-3
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rg.au/
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 01:52:35PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:06:47PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Please CC me on replies to the list.
>
> | Mail-Followup-To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
> Please set this to a proper value.
I've trie
> 2.4 vanilla does not work for s390 and it is not longer supported by
> ibm.
That may be true, but isn't 2.4.27 s390 still in Sarge?
I guess we should addit to sarge2, but leave Marcelo out of the loop.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ully some more volunteers can be found.
Failing that, keep updating 2.4.27, as we already are for Sarge
security, and include that.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thers) to keep doing this for 2.4. So if you have patches
for critical bugs, please forward them on - he can decide to drop or
keep them.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;t declare a relation to
> ide-generic in situations where it actually does need it. Why not fix
> the kernel, so that yaird doesn't have to bend over backwards? Not that
> I really care either way, but it does seem to me to be cleaner to fix
> the underlying problem rather than
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:24:51AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:51:52AM +0000, Horms wrote:
> > Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh look, why are you still fighting about this? It seems to me that the
> > > r
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:03:38AM +0900, Horms wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:24:51AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:51:52AM +, Horms wrote:
>> > > Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:30:10PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Also this patch:
> > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/diffs/fs/xfs/[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]|src/|src/fs|src/fs/xfs|related/fs/xfs/xfs_dinode.h|[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]|hist/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > ([XFS] Hand
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 12:26:27PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:30:10PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > Also this patch:
> > > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/diffs/fs/xfs/[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]|src/|src/fs|src/fs/xfs|related/fs/xfs/xfs_dinode.h
I have
added for inclusinon in the forthcoming 2.4.27-13 release.
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|src/|src/fs|src/fs/xfs|src/fs/xfs/linux-2.4|related/fs/xfs/linux-2.4/xfs_vnode.h
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
solution to that problem,
as annotated in that bug.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=343970
I would like to use this bug, 344036, to address the missing ACCEPT
symbol in orinoco.o. I hope to post a solution to that problem shortly.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
tags 344036 +pending
thanks
I believe that the following patch, which will be included in
2.4.27-13 and 2.4.27-10sarge2 trivially resolves this problem.
--
Horms
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/hermes.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/hermes.c
@@ -2312,6 +2312,8 @@ orinoco_stat_gather(struct
ity levels before 4 are deprecated.
dh_installdirs
dh_installdirs: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated.
dh_testdir
cd kernel-source-2.4.27; \
HEADER_CLEAN_HOOK=/home/horms/tmp/debian-kernel-test/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386-trunk/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386-2.4.27/header-inst
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:06:49AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 11:59 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On the grounds that a) it fixes a security bug and b) it doesn't appear
> > to change the ABI, yes, please go for it.
>
> kernel/sarge-security/kernel/sou
4
> 5334 90.93% i386
> 5866 100.00% total (ignored 639 without arch info)
>
> (Please participate. :)
Thanks for that information, it is very useful indeed.
I have CCed this reply to debian-kernel, that is probably the best forum
to continue discussion.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
have been dropped due to
> lack of interest; sparc, alpha, and powerpc folks should determine
> their value, at some point.
>
> Hm, anything I'm forgetting?
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe&
uld determine which
kernel-source package the kernel was derived from,
and reassign the bug to that package.
Hi Kurt,
Could you please send the output of lsmod and lspci -v,
hopefully your hardware is reasonably common and i can
reproduce this problem. However, a quick fix might be
to try the 2
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 01:30:41PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 09:44 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Kurt,
> > >
> > > Could you please send the output of lsmod and lspci -v,
> > > hop
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:20:31PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:55:42 +0300, Horms wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
> [...]
> >> - i'm leaning towards using gcc-3.3, as i'm afraid of gc
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 12:29:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 04:55:42PM +0300, Horms wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > Alright folks, I think the packaging is ready to be beaten on by people.
> > >
to the main kernel-source package?
Firstly, I don't agree that this is neccessary for GPL compliance
in any way whatsoever, however I do accept that some people believe that
it is. To keep those people happy, kernel-images should depend on
kernel-tree-X.Y.Z-N and everything works just fi
; > follows non-static declaration
> > scripts/kconfig/lkc.h:63: error: previous declaration of 'current_menu'
> > was here
> > make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/mconf.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [xconfig] Error 2
> >
>
>
> Uh, right.. Horms, would you
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:56:01AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:55:42 +0300, Horms wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I need to do something about the fact that users go and
> > grab kernel-source-2.4.27 and it doesn't compile with the
> > d
ig that I haven't figured out, I
> don't think it's possible to reproduce this in a Debian kernel. The drive
> would not be accessible at all.
>
> If that's the case, I'd be happy to talk to upstream myself about it.
> Talking to the SATA maintainers would
gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.1/include/stddef.h:214: error: syntax error
> before 'typedef'
[snip]
Do you have build-essential and in particular, libc6-dev installed?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sn't part of sarge anyway) so only ia64 is affected. However
the patch should fix both.
--
Horms
commit 1e483bdd0ac8852a53e32e09059df9788619b3e8
tree 29e6ef82f987734d97da57af63a5f0410c21996c
parent bb6c40830e2f66b33c22275829a730ed078e430a
author Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1119964612
please do that. I'm marking this as wontfix and leaving it open
so it can act as a reference for others.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n this was included in?
If it is in 2.6.12 then it is already in unstable.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:04:07AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:17:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> >
te that your kernel
> will not boot!
> but it can also be triggered by needed modules being
> compiled into
> the kernel.
> Not touching initrd symlinks since we are being
> reinstalled (2
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:44:49AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> (I am sending this to cdrecord / dvdrecord / gcombust mantainers
> as well: please read below)
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 06:30:25PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > tag 319457 +wontfix
> > thanks
> >
> >
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:04:07AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> The DI kernel udebs (linux-kernel-di- source) takes the
> >> kernel-ima
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu,
reassign 320033 kernel-source-2.6.8
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
able to
work this out using dmsg and lsmod. Then compare this to the modules
that are included in your initrd image and its /loadmodules script.
If you can't get anywhere could you send the output of dmsg and lsmod
from kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386, and from the initrd image of
kernel-image-2.
> [...]
> "
>
> So tried with bootoption
> pnpbios=off
> pci=nosort
> acpi=off
> apm=off
>
>
> but nothing works..
This sounds a lot like Bug #296762
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=296762
Could you take a look at that and see if it he
ng that fix to
Debain.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; #284477 has `kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686';
> #298301 has `kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386'
>
> > thanks
> Stopping processing here.
>
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
>
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 284477 kernel-source-2.6.8
reassign 298301 kernel-source-2.6.8
reassign 302001 kernel-source-2.6.8
merge 284477 298301 302001
thanks
Take III, send message to control not owner.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:52:55PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:33:12AM -0700, Debian
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:48:20PM -0700, Dustin wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Horms wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:23:57PM -0700, Dustin Laurence wrote:
>
> > > Not finding it on the system, I mounted the initrd files and found a
> > > script named ext
l be in the X.Org
> packages. We are currently working in the upcoming 6.9 X.Org release that we
> hope to solve your problem (and several others).
Is there any value in the patches been added to the debian kernel
at this stage? And more to the point, is there any information
on the st
kernel 2.6 in general because it works with kernel
> 2.4. Is there a workaround or kernel option to allow the use of ps/2 barcode
> scanners with kernel 2.6?
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and will try this too.
Giving the kernel boot parameter noapic should have the same effect
as diabling X86_UP_IOAPIC at compile time on a UP system.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:13:59AM +0200, Martin Stigge wrote:
> Horms schrieb:
> >>after reading other bug reports regarding symptoms with a crazy clock, I
> >>think the behaviour I described is the same as in #284477 and #298301.
> >>
> >>http://bugs.debi
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 02:22:09PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We seem to be running around in circles here. If an image package
> > depends on kernel-tree-x.y.z-N, then kernel-source-x.y.z can be
> > updated and
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:08:53AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 18:29 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:45:20AM +0200, David MartÃnez Moreno wrote:
> > > El Martes, 26 de Julio de 2005 05:20, Drew Parsons escribió:
> > > >
on boot; sometimes it drifts a lot,
> sometimes a little. Still.
Thanks for the follow up.
I am less suspicious of it being a debian problem and
more suspicious of it being an upstream problem.
Though I am still entirely unsure what to do about it,
other than booting with noacpi.
--
Horms
ust mailed me and showed me this bugreport:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298623
>
> and this is exactly my problem g
Yes, I think you are correct, I have merged these bugs accordingly.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
ly been added.
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/
I agree that downloading that behemouth is a bit of an ask.
--
Horms
/proc/bus/usb filesystem output
===
(version 2003.05.30)
The usbfs filesystem for USB devices is traditionally mounted at
/proc/bus
they become available.
I guess these could be used in lieu of or as the basis of
a security update. But I have no idea if the security team
is interested in updating the kernel or not.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> > I am wondering if others thing that volatile is a good
> > place for us to make uploads of updated 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 kerels for
> > Sarge? This would allow us to
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 11:43]:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> > > > I am wondering if others
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:01]:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Yes, that was about my intention as well. So, yes, please move forward
> > > with 2.4.2
make the volatile uploads follow the unstable
naming convention, that is just make them 2.6.8-17 and 2.4.27-11
respectively.
On a related note, I'd like to remove 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 from unstable.
This means removing 2.4 from unstable. Let the fun begin.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:11:29PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:40:26 +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >> * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 08:23]:
> >> > I am wondering if oth
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:36:04PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Horms said he had merged in up to 2.6.12.2, so I went through the
> 2.6.12.3 changes. Here's my notes - I've committed the three I marked
> applicable.
>
> [PATCH] If ACPI doesn't find an irq listed,
Hi Marcelo,
is this appropriate for 2.4? It seems to apply cleanly to
your current git tree.
Signed-off-by: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: john stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 05:08:54 + (+1000)
Subject: [PATCH] ppc32: stop misusing ntps time_offset val
1 - 100 of 1338 matches
Mail list logo
