On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:04:07AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> >> The DI kernel udebs (linux-kernel-di-<arch> source) takes the > >> >> kernel-image deb, splits it up into kernel and several groups of > >> >> modules and builds udebs. There is no Depends there and can't be to > >> >> keep the kernel-image debs available. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> kernel-image-di-arch ---source---> linux-kernel-di > >> >> | > >> >> magic > >> >> | > >> >> \/ > >> >> kernel-tree-X.Y.Z-N <---depends--- kernel-image > >> >> | > >> >> \/ > >> >> kernel sources > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> The 'magic' part is the problem. > >> > > >> > I don't follow why there is a problem with linux-kernel-di > >> > depending on kernel-tree-X.Y.Z-N. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Horms > >> > >> The problem is that the DAK will update linux-2.6, kernel-tree-x.y.z-n > >> and kernel-image packages without any regards to linux-kernel-di. They > >> will become out of sync and end up without source -> GPL violation. > >> > >> In the old setup kernel-source-2.6.8 will remain until removed manualy > >> and linux-kernel-di has that as source. > > > > But kernel-source-x.y.z.N provides kernel-tree-x.y.z-n for 1 <= n <= N > > Surely this resolves the problem some people percieve with regards > > to the GPL. > > No. Since linux-2.6 source means kernel-tree-x.y.(z+1)-1 will replace > kernel-tree-x.y.z-n now. > > You would have to provide 1 <= z <= Z, 1 <= n <= N for it to still > work.
Ok, understood. Is there a reason that the dependancy can't be on kernel-tree-x.y.x-N? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
