On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 02:45 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Looks like squeeze4 is the latest actual upload BTW, at least
> according to the PTS. squeeze5 has a bunch of stuff in it...
bugfix/all/CVE-2013-6378.patch which was added to the series in
48squeeze5 in early January is missing, so things d
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 15:48 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 22:56 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 20:25 +1000, Kris Shannon wrote:
> > > > I was eagerly awating the release of linux-2.6_2.6.32-48s
On 25/02/2014 7:44 am, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:14 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
A regression due to a security fix is also a valid reason for a further
security update.
Ah, I'd forgotten that was why this was. I'll try
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:30:41PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 21:23 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 08:14:31PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 15:48 +, Ian Campbell w
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 08:14:31PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 15:48 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > The other question is whether there will be any more updates to the
> > > Squeeze kernel at all, aren't we into se
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 21:23 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 08:14:31PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 15:48 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > The other question is whether there will be any more upd
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:14 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 15:48 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > The other question is whether there will be any more updates to the
> > > Squeeze kernel at all, aren't we into security
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:11 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 15:48 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The other question is whether there will be any more updates to the
> > Squeeze kernel at all, aren't we into security fixes only mode for
> > Squeeze by now?
>
> A regression due t
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 15:48 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 22:56 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 20:25 +1000, Kris Shannon wrote:
> > > I was eagerly awating the release of linux-2.6_2.6.32-48squeeze4
> > > because it would fix #701744 (fallout from XSA-39:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:48:26PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 22:56 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 20:25 +1000, Kris Shannon wrote:
> > > I was eagerly awating the release of linux-2.6_2.6.32-48squeeze4
> > > because it would fix #701744 (fallout from
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 22:56 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 20:25 +1000, Kris Shannon wrote:
> > I was eagerly awating the release of linux-2.6_2.6.32-48squeeze4
> > because it would fix #701744 (fallout from XSA-39: Linux netback DoS
> > via malicious guest ring)
> >
> >
> >
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 22:56 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> As a temporary workaround I think that turning off TSO on netfront would
> avoid the problem, but it will reduce network TX performance.
That's:
ethtool -K $IFACE tso off
substituting the name of the network interface for $I
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 20:25 +1000, Kris Shannon wrote:
> I was eagerly awating the release of linux-2.6_2.6.32-48squeeze4
> because it would fix #701744 (fallout from XSA-39: Linux netback DoS
> via malicious guest ring)
>
>
> It turns out I should have read the bug report more closely.
>
> #70
I was eagerly awating the release of linux-2.6_2.6.32-48squeeze4 because it
would fix #701744 (fallout from XSA-39: Linux netback DoS via malicious
guest ring)
It turns out I should have read the bug report more closely.
#701744 was only about the xen-netback side of things.
I haven't been able
14 matches
Mail list logo
