On 25/02/2014 7:44 am, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:14 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 20:11 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
A regression due to a security fix is also a valid reason for a further
security update.
Ah, I'd forgotten that was why this was. I'll try and take a look but
I'm travelling for the next ~10 days.
Is there a bug # for this issue separate from the already closed backend
one?
It doesn't look like it. Kris, please open a new bug report.
Ben.
#740041
BTW, this is no longer an active problem for us since Redhat finally included
the netback patch in their RHEL5 kernel (and it trickled down to CentOS)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/530c30be.6050...@shannon.id.au
