On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:09:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > Other issues:
> > > > * NEW
> > > > Quite a lot of the arches have the newest version of linux-2.6
> > > > stuck in NEW for a week. I assume the f
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:34:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So if -15 is still broken I should plan to NMU rather than count on -16
> doing anything to address the needs of testing users in a timely manner?
Only porters have the right to do so with consensus within the porter
group. And even
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:18:07AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:49:35AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I marked #369017 as important, should it be RCed ?
>
> Ask him to upload this today and than NMU it if needed.
Well, i filled the patch, with a name that is rather sp
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:34:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:16:47AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:09:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > > > Other issues:
> > > >
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:16:47AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:09:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > > Other issues:
> > > > > * NEW
> > > > > Quite a lot of the arches have the newest versi
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:49:35AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> I marked #369017 as important, should it be RCed ?
Ask him to upload this today and than NMU it if needed.
Bastian
--
A father doesn't destroy his children.
-- Lt. Carolyn Palamas, "Who Mourns for Adonais?",
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:09:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > Other issues:
> > > > * NEW
> > > > Quite a lot of the arches have the newest version of linux-2.6
> > > > stuck in NEW for a week. I assume the f
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 11:46:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > #365455
> > > Support for some minor powerpc subarches is lost in the new version
> > > of the kernel. Presumably this includes bug #359025. Given all the
> >
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:09:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > Other issues:
> > > > * NEW
> > > > Quite a lot of the arches have the newest version of linux-2.6
> > > > stuck in NEW for a week. I assume the f
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Other issues:
> > > * NEW
> > > Quite a lot of the arches have the newest version of linux-2.6
> > > stuck in NEW for a week. I assume the ftpmasters will fix this soon.
> > Seems to be resolved now.
> -15 will again hit NEW.
* Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-29 09:51]:
> > > There's also an unrelated build failure on mipsel.
> > I've no idea where this error comes from. waldi?
>
> The image don't build modules while the config says it does.
Any idea why?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 11:46:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > #365455
> > > Support for some minor powerpc subarches is lost in the new version
> > > of the kernel. Presumably this includes bug #359025. Given all the
> >
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 11:46:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > #365455
> > Support for some minor powerpc subarches is lost in the new version
> > of the kernel. Presumably this includes bug #359025. Given all the
> > other reasons for updating it, the words "omlette" and "eggs" c
[ restrict to debian-kernel ]
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-28 23:46]:
> > There's also an unrelated build failure on mipsel.
> I've no idea where this error comes from. waldi?
The image don't build modules while
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-28 23:46]:
> There's also an unrelated build failure on mipsel.
I've no idea where this error comes from. waldi?
== making target build [new prereqs: stamp-build]==
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.16/debian/build/bui
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:02:38PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> It's been a rather long time since the linux-2.6 in testing has gotten
> updated. I count something like 24 security holes[1] in the version in
> testing that would be fixed if we could get a release in from unstable.
> We also cannot rea
16 matches
Mail list logo
