Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
The debian-kernel-maint list has received nothing but spam and
unanswered user questions since February 2007, shortly after its
creation. In fact I wasn't aware of its existence until just
now when I scrolled down the list of lists fror devel
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:47:58PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>> I believe the original idea was to create d-k-m for discussions and
>> keep d-k as the address in maintainer field (and the primary contact
>> address for the user requests). This appears
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:47:58PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> I believe the original idea was to create d-k-m for discussions and
> keep d-k as the address in maintainer field (and the primary contact
> address for the user requests). This appears to be the most
> straightforward way, as it re
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 11:56:17AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> We've had debian-kernel-maint for a while now, but its never really
> been used. Should we keep it around?
>
> >From what I understand, the reason for this list was to separate
> kernel discussions from the bu
We've had debian-kernel-maint for a while now, but its never really
been used. Should we keep it around?
>From what I understand, the reason for this list was to separate
kernel discussions from the bug "noise". Since debian-kernel is still
listed as the maintainer, it seems t
5 matches
Mail list logo
