On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 11:56:17AM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > We've had debian-kernel-maint for a while now, but its never really > been used. Should we keep it around? > > >From what I understand, the reason for this list was to separate > kernel discussions from the bug "noise". Since debian-kernel is still > listed as the maintainer, it seems to me that it makes more sense to > move debbugs stuff away debian-kernel rather than move discussions to > a new list (since many of them will begin w/ a message to the > maintainer address). > > How about we ask the bugs.debian.org folks to redirect bug mail to > debian-kernel-maint, and continue to use debian-kernel for > discussions?
I believe the original idea was to create d-k-m for discussions and keep d-k as the address in maintainer field (and the primary contact address for the user requests). This appears to be the most straightforward way, as it requires no changes. -- Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
