On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:37:38PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060619 20:51]:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:56:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > The only technical issue is getting the
* dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060619 20:51]:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:56:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I
> > > think rough consensus was to leave
Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> >Jurij Smakov wrote:
> >[snip]
> >>There are a couple of patches for 2.6.16 which I would love to see
> >>included. There is a D-cache memory corruption fix included in 2.6.17
> >>(attached as sparc64-dcache.patch), which did not
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > What is the status of the other architectures?
> >
> > alpha
>
> Test-build is running currently.
2.6.17 is ready on alpha, kernel built and works fine.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Jurij Smakov wrote:
[snip]
There are a couple of patches for 2.6.16 which I would love to see
included. There is a D-cache memory corruption fix included in 2.6.17
(attached as sparc64-dcache.patch), which did not appear in a 2.6.16
point release as I h
Jurij Smakov wrote:
[snip]
> There are a couple of patches for 2.6.16 which I would love to see
> included. There is a D-cache memory corruption fix included in 2.6.17
> (attached as sparc64-dcache.patch), which did not appear in a 2.6.16
> point release as I hoped. As it also affect the mips arc
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
I would like to reschedule the uploads:
Unless someone objects, we will upload both linux-2.6.16 and linux-2.6
to unstable tomorrow, 20th of June.
- linux-2.6 2.6.17-1 is what we have in dists/trunk/linux-2.6 now.
- linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-15
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:56:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I
> > think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in
> > linux-2.6.16 and either 1) dr
Joey Hess wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I
> > > think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in
> > > linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop meta package
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it
> > to unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06).
> > http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/pool/main/l/linux-
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I
> > think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in
> > linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop meta packages from linux-2.6 >= 2.6.17
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I
> think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in
> linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop meta packages from linux-2.6 >= 2.6.17
> or 2) create separate metap
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:59:29PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to reschedule the uploads:
>
> Unless someone objects, we will upload both linux-2.6.16 and linux-2.6
> to unstable tomorrow, 20th of June.
>
> - linux-2.6 2.6.17-1 is what we have in dists/trunk/linux-2
* Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-19 15:18]:
> mipsel was broken by a kernel-package change, which should have been
> fixed too by now.
For the record, kernel-package didn't change. The kernel package
introduced new functionality which relied on a feature kernel-package
didn't yet
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-19 14:34]:
> On Monday 19 June 2006 13:59, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > - linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-15 is what we have in dists/sid/linux-2.6 now,
>
> Will this fix the build problems for both hppa and mipsel?
mipsel should build with the new kernel-package (10.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:34:39PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 19 June 2006 13:59, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > - linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-15 is what we have in dists/sid/linux-2.6 now,
>
> Will this fix the build problems for both hppa and mipsel?
> What about the RC bugs that have also been k
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:34:39PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Will this fix the build problems for both hppa and mipsel?
> What about the RC bugs that have also been keeping 2.6.16 out of testing?
hppa seems fixed in svn.
mipsel was broken by a kernel-package change, which should have been
fix
On Monday 19 June 2006 13:59, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> - linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-15 is what we have in dists/sid/linux-2.6 now,
Will this fix the build problems for both hppa and mipsel?
What about the RC bugs that have also been keeping 2.6.16 out of testing?
pgp4U7f1aBAOa.pgp
Description: PGP si
Hello,
I would like to reschedule the uploads:
Unless someone objects, we will upload both linux-2.6.16 and linux-2.6
to unstable tomorrow, 20th of June.
- linux-2.6 2.6.17-1 is what we have in dists/trunk/linux-2.6 now.
- linux-2.6.16 2.6.16-15 is what we have in dists/sid/linux-2.6 now,
Bas
On Sunday 18 June 2006 23:58, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> The problem is: we need a kernel >> 2.6.15 in testing ASAP (2.6.15 is
> really old, and d-i needs a new kernel for the next release candidate).
That is correct. Now that the testing archive for amd64 is complete (for
the purposed of new ins
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:12:06AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:44:01PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Yeah, istr having an issue like that as well. We should probably keep the
> > 2.6.16 compiler hardcoded to whatever is the default in etch when we
> > upload (its stil
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:44:01PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Yeah, istr having an issue like that as well. We should probably keep the
> 2.6.16 compiler hardcoded to whatever is the default in etch when we
> upload (its still gcc-4.0 today, right)?
It will be hardcoded to -4.0 with the next up
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:23:15PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > What is the status of the other architectures?
>
> ia64 configs have been updated & test builds are in progress
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux biglpk 2.6.17
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 12:06:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:58:26PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:47:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > What about :
> > >
> > > We upload linux-2.6 2.6.17 ASAP, and if 2.6.16 is finally
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it to
> unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06).
i'll prepare an klibc upload for tuesday:
1.3.40
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:39:16PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:29:32AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Is the plan to do a "linux-2.6.16" upload at the same time, or does
> > this imply a decision to use >= 2.6.17 in etch?
>
> We have not yet decided abo
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it to
unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06).
snapshots for
amd64
i386
powerpc
s390
sparc
and the sources can be found here (when they have finished building):
http://kernel-archi
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:58:26PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:47:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > What about :
> >
> > We upload linux-2.6 2.6.17 ASAP, and if 2.6.16 is finally the way to go,
> > we
> > upload linux-2.6.16 or linux-2.6.etch, and pr
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:47:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> What about :
>
> We upload linux-2.6 2.6.17 ASAP, and if 2.6.16 is finally the way to go, we
> upload linux-2.6.16 or linux-2.6.etch, and propagate this one to testing.
The problem is: we need a kernel >> 2.6.15 in testing AS
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:39:16PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:29:32AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Is the plan to do a "linux-2.6.16" upload at the same time, or does
> > this imply a decision to use >= 2.6.17 in etch?
>
> We have not yet decided abo
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 11:29:32AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Is the plan to do a "linux-2.6.16" upload at the same time, or does
> this imply a decision to use >= 2.6.17 in etch?
We have not yet decided about what to use for etch. There has not been
any more commitment towards a long-te
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> What is the status of the other architectures?
ia64 configs have been updated & test builds are in progress
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it to
> unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06).
Is the plan to do a "linux-2.6.16" upload at the same time, or does
this imply a decision to use >= 2.6.17 in
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> What is the status of the other architectures?
>
> hppa
Test build underway, with 2/4 flavours built, the only update needed
seems to be a new config option.
Cheers,
Kyle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it to
> unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06).
I take it that the idea of using 2.6.16.x for etch has been dropped?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
> What is the status of the other architectures?
>
> m68k
I am waiting for the linux-m68k CVS to catch up. Could happen today, or next
month... I would give it about a week.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> What is the status of the other architectures?
>
> alpha
Test-build is running currently.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Linux 2.6.17 has been released today, and I would like to upload it to
unstable tomorrow (Monday 19.06).
snapshots for
amd64
i386
powerpc
s390
sparc
and the sources can be found here (when they have finished building):
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/pool/main/l/lin
38 matches
Mail list logo
