On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:56:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:10:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > The only technical issue is getting the meta packages to play well. I > > think rough consensus was to leave the metapackages as-is in > > linux-2.6.16 and either 1) drop meta packages from linux-2.6 >= 2.6.17 > > or 2) create separate metapackages for linux-2.6 (linux-image-2.6-686-sid, > > for example). > > AFAIK the plan is the following: > - linux-2.6 remains the metapackages, the point to the last available > one. > - linux-2.6.16 contains no metapackages. > - linux-latest-2.6 or so contains the metapackages to match linux-2.6.16 > and have to go through t-p-u.
fwiw, this doesn't provide a way for people to track the proposed etch kernel in sid, which may reduce the number of testers of that kernel prior to migration. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
