Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-24 Thread Alexander Wirt
Ben Hutchings schrieb am Wednesday, den 25. January 2012: > On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 16:30 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Ben Hutchings schrieb am Montag, den 23. Januar 2012: > > > > > On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:16 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > > > > Am 18.01.2012 04:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > >

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 16:30 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Ben Hutchings schrieb am Montag, den 23. Januar 2012: > > > On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:16 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > > > Am 18.01.2012 04:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > > >> cpufrequtils (007-2) > > > >> > > > >> A separate build-containe

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-24 Thread Marcus Osdoba
Am 24.01.2012 16:00, schrieb Ben Hutchings: On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 13:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:16 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: I have found linux-2.6 in the bpo upload Q today. Thanks for this. Please keep cpufrequtils-007-2 for kernels>= 3.0 in mind. I will leave

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 13:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:16 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > > Am 18.01.2012 04:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > >> cpufrequtils (007-2) > > >> > > >> A separate build-container for each architecture was used to be sure, > > >> that there are onl

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-24 Thread Jens Schüßler
* Alexander Wirt wrote: > Jens Schüßler schrieb am Dienstag, den 24. Januar 2012: > > > * Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > micah anderson schrieb am Montag, den 23. Januar 2012: > > > > > > > > I believe that 2.6.39 left unstable some time ago, to be replaced by > > > > 3.x, so I'm not sure how that

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-24 Thread Jens Schüßler
* Alexander Wirt wrote: > micah anderson schrieb am Montag, den 23. Januar 2012: > > > > I believe that 2.6.39 left unstable some time ago, to be replaced by > > 3.x, so I'm not sure how that will work exacty? > we have 3.x in bpo since today. Will there be i386 builds also? I miss them. Jens

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-24 Thread Alexander Wirt
Jens Schüßler schrieb am Dienstag, den 24. Januar 2012: > * Alexander Wirt wrote: > > micah anderson schrieb am Montag, den 23. Januar 2012: > > > > > > I believe that 2.6.39 left unstable some time ago, to be replaced by > > > 3.x, so I'm not sure how that will work exacty? > > we have 3.x in b

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-23 Thread Alexander Wirt
micah anderson schrieb am Montag, den 23. Januar 2012: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:30:29 +0100, Alexander Wirt > wrote: > > Ben Hutchings schrieb am Montag, den 23. Januar 2012: > > > > > On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:16 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > > > > Am 18.01.2012 04:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings: >

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-23 Thread micah anderson
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:30:29 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Ben Hutchings schrieb am Montag, den 23. Januar 2012: > > > On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:16 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > > > Am 18.01.2012 04:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > > >> cpufrequtils (007-2) > > > >> > > > >> A separate build-contai

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-23 Thread Alexander Wirt
Ben Hutchings schrieb am Montag, den 23. Januar 2012: > On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:16 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > > Am 18.01.2012 04:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > >> cpufrequtils (007-2) > > >> > > >> A separate build-container for each architecture was used to be sure, > > >> that there are only

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:16 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > Am 18.01.2012 04:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > >> cpufrequtils (007-2) > >> > >> A separate build-container for each architecture was used to be sure, > >> that there are only stable packages installed. I reverted the compiler > >> back to gc

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 12:53 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Ben Hutchings schrieb am Sunday, den 22. January 2012: [...] > > I'm waiting for my key to be added, as I've replaced my key since the > > last time I made backports. > in fact you wanted me to replace 12066207 with 95861109 (your ticket wa

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-22 Thread Alexander Wirt
Marcus Osdoba schrieb am Monday, den 23. January 2012: > Am 18.01.2012 04:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > >>cpufrequtils (007-2) > >> > >>A separate build-container for each architecture was used to be sure, > >>that there are only stable packages installed. I reverted the compiler > >>back to gcc 4.

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-22 Thread Marcus Osdoba
Am 18.01.2012 04:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings: cpufrequtils (007-2) A separate build-container for each architecture was used to be sure, that there are only stable packages installed. I reverted the compiler back to gcc 4.4. Cpufrequtils is needed for newer kernels to have the cpufreq modules work

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-22 Thread Alexander Wirt
Ben Hutchings schrieb am Sunday, den 22. January 2012: > On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 10:29 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > > Am 18.01.2012 05:05, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 03:42 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 00:40 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > > > [...]

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 10:29 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > Am 18.01.2012 05:05, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 03:42 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 00:40 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > > [...] > >>> Now that I finished with building up > >> [...] > >>> linux-

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-22 Thread Marcus Osdoba
Am 18.01.2012 05:05, schrieb Ben Hutchings: On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 03:42 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 00:40 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: [...] Now that I finished with building up [...] linux-image-3.1.0-1-486_3.1.8-2~bpo60+1_i386.deb This is wrong; modules built for '3.

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-17 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 03:42 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 00:40 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: [...] > > Now that I finished with building up > [...] > > linux-image-3.1.0-1-486_3.1.8-2~bpo60+1_i386.deb > > This is wrong; modules built for '3.1.0-1-486' in testing/unstable will

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-17 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 00:40 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > Am 19.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > > > Please keep linux-2.6 up-to-date in backports [..] > > > > Hello debian kernel maintainers, > I've created a private backport of kernel 3.1.8 from testing for i386/amd64. > > The packages

Re: Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2012-01-17 Thread Marcus Osdoba
Am 19.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Ben Hutchings: Please keep linux-2.6 up-to-date in backports [..] Hello debian kernel maintainers, I've created a private backport of kernel 3.1.8 from testing for i386/amd64. The packages I considered are: linux-image-amd64 linux-image-i386-686-pae linux-image-i

Outdated linux-2.6 backport

2011-10-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
Norbert, There does not appear to have been an upload of linux-2.6 to squeeze-backports since July, but version 3.0.0-3 entered testing on 30 August (now 6 weeks ago). Please keep linux-2.6 up-to-date in backports or ask for a co-maintainer to help you do that. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings 73.46% of