Ben Hutchings schrieb am Sunday, den 22. January 2012: > On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 10:29 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > > Am 18.01.2012 05:05, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 03:42 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 00:40 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > > > [...] > > >>> Now that I finished with building up > > >> [...] > > >>> linux-image-3.1.0-1-486_3.1.8-2~bpo60+1_i386.deb > > >> > > >> This is wrong; modules built for '3.1.0-1-486' in testing/unstable will > > >> not be loadable in a backported kernel due to the compiler version > > >> change. (I don't believe that gcc 4.4 and 4.6 are at all incompatible, > > >> but the module loader does check this.) > > > [...] > > > > > > Hmm... I think it used to, but I don't see any sign that it does any > > > more. But let's not test this. > > > > > Sorry, I didn't get this. I've downgraded the compiler for the > > backported kernel to gcc 4.4. > > > > Thesis: > > In general you won't have plain testing-packages if you just use > > stable+stable-backports. So when compiling the 3.1.8-modules with the > > same stable gcc (4.4) there is no gcc version mismatch within > > stable+stable-backports (there is no gcc 4.6...) > > Right. But if the ABI number was left at 1, then it would be possible > to have a mismatch. > > > So every additonal kernel module (besides those packaged inside > > linux-image) need to be backported with the same gcc version. > > No, Debian now only packages source for out-of-tree modules. They are > built on user systems by dkms or module-assistant. > > > Forgive me, if I got that completly wrong. > > > > Anyway, are there any news in the backport upload process? I still use > > my own packages, but on the server I feel more comfortable with an > > "official" version where more users may file bugs against. > > I'm waiting for my key to be added, as I've replaced my key since the > last time I made backports. in fact you wanted me to replace 12066207 with 95861109 (your ticket was a little bit misleading).
I did this a few minutes ago. Thanks for taking care of the kernel Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120122115320.gh2...@smithers.snow-crash.org
