Re: Linux kernel version for wheezy

2012-01-23 Thread dann frazier
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:28:41AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > If I don't hear any objections from the kernel team in the next week, > I'm going to assume that everyone is happy to go with Linux 3.2. I'm cool w/ that. -dann > The decision needs to be communicated to Debian developers in gen

Re: Linux kernel version for wheezy

2012-01-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 14:30 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Ben Hutchings schrieb: > > > > --=-F52UMDY0vyvxMmwyXMtI > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > If I don't hear any objections from the kernel team in the next week, > > I'm

Re: Linux kernel version for wheezy

2012-01-22 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Ben Hutchings schrieb: > > --=-F52UMDY0vyvxMmwyXMtI > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > If I don't hear any objections from the kernel team in the next week, > I'm going to assume that everyone is happy to go with Linux 3.2. > > The decisio

Re: Linux kernel version for wheezy

2012-01-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
If I don't hear any objections from the kernel team in the next week, I'm going to assume that everyone is happy to go with Linux 3.2. The decision needs to be communicated to Debian developers in general (d-d-a) and to Greg Kroah-Hartman in his capacity as organiser of stable/longterm series. If

Linux kernel version for wheezy

2011-11-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
Given a freeze in June 2012, we will have a choice between these Linux releases (with estimated dates): 3.2 (December 2011) 3.3 (March 2012) 3.4 (May/June 2012) Some other distributions with long-term support will be using: Oracle Linux 6: 2.6.32+ (RHEL-compatible), 2.6.39 (UEK) RHEL 6: