On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 14:30 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> schrieb: > > > > --=-F52UMDY0vyvxMmwyXMtI > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > If I don't hear any objections from the kernel team in the next week, > > I'm going to assume that everyone is happy to go with Linux 3.2. > > > > The decision needs to be communicated to Debian developers in general > > (d-d-a) and to Greg Kroah-Hartman in his capacity as organiser of > > stable/longterm series. If we go with 3.2 then we will also want to > > work closely with the Ubuntu kernel maintainers. > > Despite my initial preference to go with 3.3/3.4 I think that's > the best option. There's nothing mouth-watering in 3.3 and the > time frame between the release of 3.2 and the Wheezy release will > be similar to the interval between 2.6.32 and Squeeze.
Probably a little shorter, in fact: Linux 2.6.32 release: 2009-12-03 Debian 6.0 release: 2011-02-06 (14 months) Linux 3.2 release: 2012-01-05 Debian 7.0 release: est. 2012-12 or 2013-01 (~12 months) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Knowledge is power. France is bacon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
