maximilian attems wrote:
Also, I remember reading about an effort on merging dom0 to mailine.
From your experience, is there a chance of that happening for 2.6.32?
>>> I don't think so.
>> For the record, Xen upstream[1] mentions "dom0 support, currently
>> planned for Linux 2.6.32 or 2.6
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:48:57AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> Also, I remember reading about an effort on merging dom0 to mailine.
> >> From your experience, is there a chance of that happening for 2.6.32?
> >
> > I don't think so.
> For the record, Xen upstream[1]
Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> Also, I remember reading about an effort on merging dom0 to mailine.
>> From your experience, is there a chance of that happening for 2.6.32?
>
> I don't think so.
For the record, Xen upstream[1] mentions "dom0 support, currently
planned for Linux 2.6.32 or 2.6.33 (latest p
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:03:40PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 20:51 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> > From your experience, is there a chance of that happening for 2.6.32?
>
> I don't think so.
>
> > (the version targetted for squeeze I presume?)
>
> Given a December fr
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 20:51 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Removal of OpenVZ, Vserver and Xen packages
> >
> > These are large and intrusive patches which require significant upstream
> > effort to adapt to each new kernel version. As a result, they generally
> > lag av
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Removal of OpenVZ, Vserver and Xen packages
>
> These are large and intrusive patches which require significant upstream
> effort to adapt to each new kernel version. As a result, they generally
> lag availability of new kernel versions and may take much longer to
> stabili
[adding openvz guys on cc ]
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Removal of OpenVZ, Vserver and Xen packages
>
> These are large and intrusive patches which require significant upstream
> effort to adapt to each new kernel version. As a result, they generally
> lag availability of new ke
There are also some potentially disruptive changes that have already
happened since lenny:
Separation of firmware
This will cause some regressions in hardware support if people do not
install the separate firmware package(s). Users need to be made aware
of this at upgrade time. There is a bug r
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 14:41 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> Heya,
>
> As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
> Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
> 2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't b
Heya,
As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
possible in this time frame. So, to find out when releasing would wo
10 matches
Mail list logo
