Ben Hutchings wrote: > Removal of OpenVZ, Vserver and Xen packages > > These are large and intrusive patches which require significant upstream > effort to adapt to each new kernel version. As a result, they generally > lag availability of new kernel versions and may take much longer to > stabilise, so they can only be frozen some time after the standard > kernel. > > There is also no guarantee that the upstream projects will continue to > support the kernel version we release with. For example, official Xen > releases are still based on 2.6.18 with huge changes (though they will > apparently move to a newer version soon). Although we were able to use > SUSE's forward-port of Xen to 2.6.26, SLE 11 was eventually released > with 2.6.27 and so we are on our own with 2.6.26+Xen. Currently, no-one > appears to be ready to maintain these variants in squeeze. I'm pretty sure that you're referring to Xen *dom0*, since domU is merged into mainline and even available into lenny's unpatched kernel (i.e. the non-xen variant). Could you verify/clarify?
Also, I remember reading about an effort on merging dom0 to mailine. >From your experience, is there a chance of that happening for 2.6.32? (the version targetted for squeeze I presume?) If not, are there any plans of providing a migration path for our users like e.g. xenner? (sorry for discussing on -release, but seems applicable) Regards, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org