-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:05:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> Before I replay to the proposal and the various options, I have two
>> questions:
>> 1) Exactly what problem or problems is this proposal solvin
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:05:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Before I replay to the proposal and the various options, I have two
> questions:
> 1) Exactly what problem or problems is this proposal solving?
This was no proposal, this was an announcement. We don't longer use this
sort of source sin
On Friday 15 February 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The kernel team made it possible for a long time to build the udebs from
> the binary linux images. This was done be providing the possibility to
> go back to every released revision with the linux-patch-debian package.
> Because this needs a lot o
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 12:11:26AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Coordination is already needed now, and will be needed even more when
> this change is implemented.
> If this means waiting with a new upstream kernel version for a week or
> two until the next beta of d-i is done, we will of co
Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<...>
>> I personally have a good relation with all active people in
>> debian-kernel but I think that we might have a "policy" to avoid
>> problems to happen. Good will isn't enough, IMO.
>
> We should decide case by case, considering what is best to
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:52:17PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Please read the thread we had about 2.6.24 kernel testing
> migration... this is what worries me.
I don't want to reopen that discussion here, and I see your argument.
There are really good reasons to do beta1 with .24, and go
Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> - Is impossible to release d-i with a different kernel from sid
>>>without a lot of hassle
>>> - If a bad kernel, with
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - Is impossible to release d-i with a different kernel from sid
>>without a lot of hassle
>> - If a bad kernel, with a bunch of ugly bugs, gets uploaded, all d-i
>>devel
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 06:42:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> For me, to think more about it, we need an agreement from kernel team
> that d-i can veto uploads of kernel. Obviously d-i team won't deny any
> upload with real reasons however this agreement this is a must from my
> POV.
Not acce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:40:47PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> If a unwanted kernel is uploaded to sid and we wanted to update the
>> udebs, for a release or something, we would end up doing it
>> t-p-u
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:40:47PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> If a unwanted kernel is uploaded to sid and we wanted to update the
> udebs, for a release or something, we would end up doing it
> t-p-u. This would be done with minor testing and possible breaking
> lenny installer.
So? If we nee
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:13:02PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
<...>
>> And the udebs on testing migrated to it from sid. I hope to not need
>> to do uploads to t-p-u for d-i kernel ;-)
>
> I still don't get you.
Kernel udebs on testing came from sid.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:13:02PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> - Is impossible to release d-i with a different kernel from sid
> >> without a lot of hassle
> > d-i releases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
<...>
>> - Is impossible to release d-i with a different kernel from sid
>> without a lot of hassle
>
> d-i releases are built with test
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> While I'm not nacking it right now, I nack it to happen before Beta2
> with 2.6.24 gets out.
I did not setup a timeline yet. Because of the status of .24, it won't
get the support anyway. So .25 is the minimum.
> - Is impossible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
While I'm not nacking it right now, I nack it to happen before Beta2
with 2.6.24 gets out.
<...>
> Build the udebs from the linux-2.6/linux-modules-extra-2.6 sources.
> Pros:
> - Only one step.
> - Problems i
Hi folks
The kernel team made it possible for a long time to build the udebs from
the binary linux images. This was done be providing the possibility to
go back to every released revision with the linux-patch-debian package.
Because this needs a lot of time to get it correctly I intend to drop
thi
17 matches
Mail list logo
