> "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes:
BH> You've convinced me that this isn't a good way to handle the change.
Glad!
BH> What I intend to do is to add a third option, BUSYBOX=auto, with the
BH> old semantics of BUSYBOX=y, and make that the default. On upgrade you
BH> may be prompted to resolve co
Control: reopen -1
Control: retitle -1 busybox/klibc selection should remain automatic for systems
that don't need busybox
On Wed, 2015-12-30 at 10:10 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > > > > > "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes:
> > > OK, but you are still going to run into problems if the user has s
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #809204 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [initramfs-tools]
busybox is required but not installed
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #809204 to the same values
previously set
> retitle -1 busybox/klibc selection should remain automatic
> "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes:
>> OK, but you are still going to run into problems if the user has set
>>
>> # apt-config dump|egrep Rec\|Sugg
>> APT::Install-Recommends "false";
>> APT::Install-Suggests "0";
BH> Users that do that need to accept that they will encounter errors like
BH> thi
On Wed, 2015-12-30 at 08:16 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > > > > > "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes:
>
> BH> Wrong, initramfs-tools-core does (and initramfs-tools used to do so
> BH> directly).
>
> OK, but you are still going to run into problems if the user has set
>
> # apt-config dump|egrep
> "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes:
BH> Wrong, initramfs-tools-core does (and initramfs-tools used to do so
BH> directly).
OK, but you are still going to run into problems if the user has set
# apt-config dump|egrep Rec\|Sugg
APT::Install-Recommends "false";
APT::Install-Suggests "0";
On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 02:12 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > > > > > "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes:
>
> BH> On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 21:20 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > > OK I find BUSYBOX=y.
> > > But I don't think I ever tampered with that file.
>
> BH> That is the default.
>
> > > That me
> "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes:
BH> On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 21:20 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
>> OK I find BUSYBOX=y.
>> But I don't think I ever tampered with that file.
BH> That is the default.
>> That means that ... you are going to have a lot of people with
>> problems shortly...
BH>
On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 21:20 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> OK I find BUSYBOX=y.
> But I don't think I ever tampered with that file.
That is the default.
> That means that ... you are going to have a lot of people with
> problems shortly...
Perhaps, but busybox is also installed by default so y
OK I find BUSYBOX=y.
But I don't think I ever tampered with that file.
That means that ... you are going to have a lot of people with problems
shortly...
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 08:45:34PM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> B> Read the NEWS.
>
> "You may need
> to modify /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools.conf or install busybox
> when upgrading."
>
> $ ls /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools.conf
> ls: cannot access /etc/initramfs-to
B> Read the NEWS.
"You may need
to modify /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools.conf or install busybox
when upgrading."
$ ls /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools.conf
ls: cannot access /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools.conf: No such file or
directory
Maybe that means the default stat
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.121~rc2
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.121~rc2) ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.3.0-1-686-pae
E: busybox is required but not installed
E: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/busybox failed with return 1.
update-initramfs: failed for
13 matches
Mail list logo