Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed

2015-12-31 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
> "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes: BH> You've convinced me that this isn't a good way to handle the change. Glad! BH> What I intend to do is to add a third option, BUSYBOX=auto, with the BH> old semantics of BUSYBOX=y, and make that the default.  On upgrade you BH> may be prompted to resolve co

Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed

2015-12-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: reopen -1 Control: retitle -1 busybox/klibc selection should remain automatic for systems that don't need busybox On Wed, 2015-12-30 at 10:10 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > > > > > > "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes: > > > OK, but you are still going to run into problems if the user has s

Processed: Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed

2015-12-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #809204 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [initramfs-tools] busybox is required but not installed Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #809204 to the same values previously set > retitle -1 busybox/klibc selection should remain automatic

Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed

2015-12-29 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
> "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes: >> OK, but you are still going to run into problems if the user has set >> >> # apt-config dump|egrep Rec\|Sugg >> APT::Install-Recommends "false"; >> APT::Install-Suggests "0"; BH> Users that do that need to accept that they will encounter errors like BH> thi

Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed

2015-12-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2015-12-30 at 08:16 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > > > > > > "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes: > > BH> Wrong, initramfs-tools-core does (and initramfs-tools used to do so > BH> directly). > > OK, but you are still going to run into problems if the user has set > > # apt-config dump|egrep

Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed

2015-12-29 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
> "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes: BH> Wrong, initramfs-tools-core does (and initramfs-tools used to do so BH> directly). OK, but you are still going to run into problems if the user has set # apt-config dump|egrep Rec\|Sugg APT::Install-Recommends "false"; APT::Install-Suggests "0";

Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)

2015-12-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 02:12 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > > > > > > "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes: > > BH> On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 21:20 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > > > OK I find BUSYBOX=y. > > > But I don't think I ever tampered with that file. > > BH> That is the default. > > > > That me

Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)

2015-12-28 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
> "BH" == Ben Hutchings writes: BH> On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 21:20 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: >> OK I find BUSYBOX=y. >> But I don't think I ever tampered with that file. BH> That is the default. >> That means that ... you are going to have a lot of people with >> problems shortly... BH>

Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)

2015-12-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 21:20 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > OK I find BUSYBOX=y. > But I don't think I ever tampered with that file. That is the default. > That means that ... you are going to have a lot of people with > problems shortly... Perhaps, but busybox is also installed by default so y

Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)

2015-12-28 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
OK I find BUSYBOX=y. But I don't think I ever tampered with that file. That means that ... you are going to have a lot of people with problems shortly...

Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)

2015-12-28 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 08:45:34PM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > B> Read the NEWS. > > "You may need > to modify /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools.conf or install busybox > when upgrading." > > $ ls /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools.conf > ls: cannot access /etc/initramfs-to

Bug#809204: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed)

2015-12-28 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
B> Read the NEWS. "You may need to modify /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools.conf or install busybox when upgrading." $ ls /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools.conf ls: cannot access /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools.conf: No such file or directory Maybe that means the default stat

Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed

2015-12-28 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.121~rc2 Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.121~rc2) ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.3.0-1-686-pae E: busybox is required but not installed E: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/busybox failed with return 1. update-initramfs: failed for