>>>>> "BH" == Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> writes:
BH> On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 21:20 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: >> OK I find BUSYBOX=y. >> But I don't think I ever tampered with that file. BH> That is the default. >> That means that ... you are going to have a lot of people with >> problems shortly... BH> Perhaps, but busybox is also installed by default so you have to remove BH> it to get into this situation. So is Windows! They would have to remove Windows and install Linux to have Linux. All I know is you are breaking all five of my machines... until I now know I you don't even Suggest or Recommend busybox. You are setting a dangerous precedence by not putting it in Depends. Can you find one single package "as broken as this" on Debian? What is the big harm in putting it in Depends (: busybox|something_else) then? The user won't be offended as he is already choosing a different configuration so can do something different in two places instead of one. I don't know what you mean by default (maybe "automatic installation of Debian via CDrom tasksel or what ever that was called but that is a very weak supposition to gamble with when a correct Depends is the proper way and .....
