On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 12:04 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2015-04-07 0:17, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Bug #780773 requests backporting a new EDAC (Error Detection And
> > Correction) driver that is wanted on some Intel-based servers. It
> > seems
> > to be simple to backport to 3.16, but I'm n
As far as I can tell, this is still outstanding - I have a newer server that
does not yet have any access to ECC counters, status or alerts, under Debian 8.
IIRC, I had verified that with a newer kernel, it “just worked” once I loaded
the appropriate EDAC modules… I think I used RHEL6 with an up
On 2015-04-07 0:17, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Bug #780773 requests backporting a new EDAC (Error Detection And
Correction) driver that is wanted on some Intel-based servers. It
seems
to be simple to backport to 3.16, but I'm not sure whether it meets the
release criteria.
EDAC drivers are not need
Bug #780773 requests backporting a new EDAC (Error Detection And
Correction) driver that is wanted on some Intel-based servers. It seems
to be simple to backport to 3.16, but I'm not sure whether it meets the
release criteria.
EDAC drivers are not needed for hardware enablement, but they are need
Le jeu. 19 mars 2015 à 7:59, Paul Menzel a
écrit :
[…]
Is that something that has to go over the Canonical Kernel Tree or
does
Debian also carry such backports separately?
Hi Paul,
The Canonical kernel team follows the stable upstream acceptance
rules¹, thus backporting this new driver² wo
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.5-1
Severity: minor
Control: fixed -1 3.17-1~exp1
Control: fixed -1 3.19-1~exp1
Dear Debian folks,
on a lot of recent Intel based servers ECC RAM cannot be taken advantage
of in Debian (or Ubuntu), because the shipped Linux kernels do not have
an EDAC module for
6 matches
Mail list logo
